Mine's a little boring to look at...
- Dimenice
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years, 5 months, and 29 days
Last active Fri, Apr, 6 2018 18:09:33 -
- 11
- 33
- 59
- 2 Followers
- 106 Total Posts
- 133 Thanks
-
2
iMPose posted a message on So...how much dust do you need?Posted in: General Discussion -
1
PictKing posted a message on What did you get in your monthly ranked season reward chest?Posted in: General DiscussionMy first rank 5 reward... Stablemaster Meh(
yeah bro, that sucks, sorry :)grats on rank 5 though!!! -
37
DevilsU posted a message on New Hearthstone rap song: One Turn Kill!Posted in: Streams and VideosHi guys,
I made a Hearthstone rap song and music video. Every sound (minus the drum beat) is from in-game sounds/music. I hope you like it!
Watch the video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuKGFW9kEmc
Listen on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/devilsu/devilsu-one-turn-kill-hearthstone-song -
17
user-20679753 posted a message on Class you are most sick of seeing ?Posted in: General DiscussionI'm sick of rocks when I play scissors.
I'm sick of scissors when I play paper.
I'm sick of papers when I play rock.
-
3
Banquetto posted a message on Time for Hearthstone to grow up BlizzPosted in: General DiscussionThere's basically either "Agro" or "Gimmick" decks .. The game would be much more interesting if you had to think and plan out your moves rather than relying on the types of decks that any dummy can play. Every expansion seems nice, it adds a little variety, but after a few weeks, it devolves back into the two types of aforementioned deck.
Throwing away literally two thirds of the game would not make it "much more interesting" in any way shape or form. OK, I get it, you want every game to be Frost Mage vs. Control Warrior. No aggro decks. No combo (or "gimmick") decks. I suggest you make some battle.net friends that feel the same way and play against them, instead of suggesting that Blizzard absolutely gut the game that millions of people enjoy. -
1
sashashepto posted a message on [POLL] Who's the cutest? Murloc Tinyfin or Sapling?Posted in: General DiscussionI vote this new card i made. so much cuter are you kidding
-
4
user-9361792 posted a message on Respect your opponent, give him a proper death.Posted in: General DiscussionI don't see a problem. My opponent can do whatever he wants on his turn. I don't care. He is given an allotted time so he/she can use it all up for all I care.
People are just being children again. No need to find BM in everything. Your opponent is just having fun.....same as you. That's why people play games. If ya can't handle it then stop playing.
-
1
jhaybirdsz posted a message on Why do folks hate priest so much??Posted in: General DiscussionPriest is my fav class in HS and it still annoys me when another Priest steals my stuff. Its basically the idea of somebody stealing something from you that makes the player frustrated
-
4
callme_charlie posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!Posted in: General DiscussionFucking control priest. This deck needs to die. As if priest didn't already have enough for control with cards like Holy Nova, Mind Control, Cabal Shadow Priest, Thoughtsteal, and Lightbomb. Now we have the wonderful Entomb.
Nothing I enjoy more than getting fucked over with my own deck. All the people bitching about secret pally and not saying a word about this brainless deck. Two guesses as to what is going to happen EVERY turn: aOe or card stealing. And once Justicar Trueheart gets out forget any chance of keeping momentum. The ONLY time I've seen this deck beat was by a really bad rng on the priests part. Usually it's instawin though.
-
7
Baudbonemeal posted a message on Why Control has such a hard time in HearthstonePosted in: General DiscussionBut this isn't MTG, nor should it be.
Control decks are to a certain extent quite viable, but with the current ranking system only an idiot would use one to rank up. That's really why they aren't that viable, they win games, but at too greater cost, a sort of Pyrrhic victory.
Control games take too long, and are often predictable and boring for both players. When using another deck, if I can play 5 games to your 1 then there's an inherent disadvantage there which I think is a bigger issue than not having board clears to fit a specific play-style. If I play against a control deck there's another 4 games I could of played in that time against other decks.
I think you have to look at the Ranking system first, before you even begin to think of making control decks viable.
The solution becomes quite muddy.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
1
Oh, so I can expect some trolden-moments with 3 pyroblasts to caster's face +transform Yoggy into sheep+assassinate himself....
3
It looks good
2
But BGH provides pretty crazy tempo swing, Enemy played Dr.Boom on turn 10? BGH+my Dr. Boom. He should be more like mid/late game (6 cost, 6/2 stats?)... I cannot bear thoughts about reducing his attack stats, he should be 'mighty' (and fit his battlecry).
p.s. 7 cost, 7/2. BGH "I have a BGH in my sight" eeh, craziness)
2
Golden epic (Lay on Hands), epic (Kidnapper), 2 rare. Nice.
0
Bah, I'm so excited... nope.
p.s. 1 week and then 3 more, i suppose...
4
I used to DE all my golden cards (if i have non-golden versions), but this one... I simply cannot)