Hearthpwn

Quote from OverholtNA >>

Less often than they find Deathstalker Rexxar on curve, which I believe is 100% of the time.

 this 100%

Quote from V0rtEXlel >>

HUGE UPDATE CAME OUT !

 Odd paladin is back so I would use DK garrosh. Btw I'm short on dust so Zilliax or Azalina? I have gorehowl and elise so maybe i can use them instead?

Must cards for wild regardless of archetype class as they will work in most decks and are actually competitive. 

Nzoth and Ragnaros. You ain't playing wild if this cards aren't in your collection.

Patches as he is staple in most aggro decks except Odd paladin.

Dirty Rat and it's not even a discussion. 

Aviana and Kun for obvious reasons.

Malganis with voidcallers that turn cubelock into a powerhouse. Also Renolock uses them

Reno and Kazakus as they make highlanders decks viable.

Brann for crazy amount of fun

Sludge Belcher

AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST Baby Blue aka the card that by being rotated to wild ruined Rogue in standard as it turned it into an aggro class. Not in wild as Baby Blue allows rogue to do crazy shit and make us opponents cry in rage. Plus it allows u to play the highest skill deck in HS- Fatigue Mill Warrior

Quote from Trollbert >>

3 expansions a year, single player content for free every expansion.  Weekly brawls, constant new holidays....

”Blizzard doesn’t work on Hearthstone”

 u clearly havent played other card games then. The problem is why change something if we have the biggest player base and making the best profit from it? nobody stops buying packs preorder exp etc. thats why theres not need to change or ADD new modes. thats what this game needs. problem is their target audience want casual and fast games meaning best of 3 matches wll never occur. funny thing is that MTGA has this with a much smaller playerbase so the argument that splitting the player base would make q times longer is just stupid cause i never have to wait mor than 15 secs on MTGA for a match

Quote from Baldassar >>

I love how people KNOW that the game will be a pay to win cashgrab, or will have terrible gameplay, or will be bad overall. I love how people are certain of this off of one short video.

The game may be bad, or it may be good. Let's just wait and see.

 its a mobile game, u are meant to play it one a tablet or god help me on a phone. an action rpg in a tiny screen with ur fingertips cluttering the screen. lol who cares if its the greatest game in existence if i have to wear a magnifying glass to play it?

PC gamers are known to have multiple screens or at least a big screen (AKA at least 24 inches) and now they are using this target audience to play a game on a tiny screen that will have endless microtransactions?

AH NO THANK YOU

Diablo on mobile is a good choice in terms of profit as mobile games make a shit ton of money. The problem was they were marketing a huge new announcement and ppl were thinking new Diablo for PC which of course was a huge letdown. The whole Blizzcon was a letdown aside the HS new exp reveal. DId u guys notice how ppl giggled when they start mentioning Destiny 2 as a way to promote Battlenet having new games aside from Blizzard ones? then the microphone problem...

And then the huge new announcement was "just" Diablo for mobiles and all of those hardcore fans were in shock, that room was filled with a deafening silence. 

So my question is if there is somehow a meta change concerning the hours of play. Maybe sometimes at night ppl are more prone to play certain archetypes or are just worst in general or their decks arent teched against the top tier decks.

My question comes from the fact that Ive been playing Big priest for the last month  in wild. yes im an idiot but i only play at 1 AM or 2 AM cause my working hours prohibit me from playing earlier so im tired and i dont want to think on  my plays. so with around 80 games with ranks from up until  14 in the last month in Wild ive achieved a 64% WR thats good and allowed me to climb at a steady rate. 

Today however ive played 21 matches during the day cause it was a national holiday and to my surprise around rank 18 i had 10 wins and 11 losses. is this normal? i never had this with the deck, It doesnt have Barnes, but for 80 matches i had 64% WR and now in 21 i had 11 losses? The only difference is that i played at day and faced a bunch of Shamans that because of Hex just screw with ur rez pool and play an endless stream of shudderwocks fiesta, actually most of them were standard decks too even when facing other classes. Again not normal.

I usually face Wild Big Priests, Rogues and reno mages and warlocks during the night, how come now everyone and their dog plays with standard decks AND they seem to be tailored to beat Big Priest but not one out of those 21 matches were Kingsbane Mill rogue?

DId I miss some kind of memo saying Big Priest aint top tier anymore? I guess im gonna play Kingsbane then, u know trade one cancer deck for another...

next exp might have a dragon theme like this one had with Mechs.

Why? well simply cause the new welcome bundle offers a free neutral classic dragon. 

Quote from TheJesterD3mon >>

Very Bad deck. Completely mulligan dependant.

 I would agree too but how can we dispute a 10/5 rank perfect run? Is pocket meta really a thing? cause one wold think he would encounter some pure counter deck and lose no matter how good is his skill

Quote from RavenSunHP >>

Unless you are playing Aggro or Tempo, I think weapon removal is a good inclusion, which is hard to replace with something more useful.

Odd Rogue is probably the most recurring target for weapon removal, and removing their weapon, even just the basic one, gains you enough Tempo to settle the game in your favour (removing a buffed one could be game winning).

And many more decks use weapons here and there. On top of that, Oozes have decent bodies for their mana cost.

As for silence, I find it really unwise not to run at least 1x, no matter what you play.

I typically run at least 1x of each in all my Midrange-y and slower decks.

 this right here sums it up. Cubelock might be dead in Standard but theres no excuse to use at least one ooze unless u are playing aggro deck

25% of players voted MTGA. That is huge considering this is a HS staple website. you would think ppl choosing HS was around 90 to 95%

I think this shows how much ppl are tired of HS residual and unfixed problems

those of u saying Tank UP should ne nerfed to 3 armour are on drugs. theres no way they are nerfing that HP.

MARK MY WORDS

going second is bad but saying aggro decks should go first is just the craziest thing ive heard

If i want to play an esquelike Magic card game i just play MTG Arena which i have nonstop since its open beta launch a week ago. HS only for daily quests hoarding that sweet gold for next Exp HOPING they end this never before seen POLARIZATION in the game on matchups.

eternal is good but like i said just go MTG instead