Argument still stands, Priest has definitely had at least 1 meta-defining deck within the history of Hearthstone, and it will continue to get them if Blizzard tries too hard to make them relevant.
Priest has had meta-defining decks but not due to any synergy with their core evergreens e.g. Undertaker Priest, Shadowreaper Razakus & Dragon Priest. Blizzard always has to give Priest stronger cards in new expansions to retain its relevance. I think they should instead improve their basic and classic sets or give them a stronger class identity altogether.
The underlying problem with Priest is its lack of class identity and weak evergreens. This means it's always going to need strong cards from a new expansion because too many of their base core cards are too slow or situational.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
That'll do, Huffer. That'll do.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Argument still stands, Priest has definitely had at least 1 meta-defining deck within the history of Hearthstone, and it will continue to get them if Blizzard tries too hard to make them relevant.
That'll do, Huffer. That'll do.
Priest has had meta-defining decks but not due to any synergy with their core evergreens e.g. Undertaker Priest, Shadowreaper Razakus & Dragon Priest. Blizzard always has to give Priest stronger cards in new expansions to retain its relevance. I think they should instead improve their basic and classic sets or give them a stronger class identity altogether.
That'll do, Huffer. That'll do.
The underlying problem with Priest is its lack of class identity and weak evergreens. This means it's always going to need strong cards from a new expansion because too many of their base core cards are too slow or situational.
That'll do, Huffer. That'll do.