Did my post offend you? Not sure why you feel the need to try to Sherlock out my true motives.
Anyways, i do care when the variance is high enough to swing an entire match. When I’m playing intelligently and properly and because of a 1 in 10 I just lose. Well that just sucks. I’ve always felt shredder effects are too swingy for battlegrounds and introduce too much RNG, imp mama is a shredder that can keep on giving.
Thanks for your input.
There's an existing megathread for Battleground salt.
Battlegrounds is built on RNG. Imp Mama's demon pool is abysmal, with only two good drops, a terrible body, and requires board space.
Okay, you got unlucky and she spawned a Voidlord. Ghastcrawler has a far better pool for drops, and other six drops have far better swing potential. She isn't even good in the machine gun comp, outside of being a cleave guard for jugglers.
Sure, you'll get unlucky about 1/10th of the time. But you'll get bottom 4 because of it 1/100th of the time.
The thread has no value when its just for you to complain about your lowroll. You just wanted attention for your comment instead of being buried in the megathread.
If you wanted actual discussion, you could have raised a thread on a card potentially in need of buffs (which can also be imp mama), or a thread on a card which is consistently causing you losses.
You seem very arrogant. I wonder if this extends into your actual real life. sadly, you don’t get to dictate what an “actual discussion” is. Also you assume a lot. I asked a question about people’s opinion of imp mama and her potential to high roll and swing entire matches. Most responded with respectful comments. You, on the other hand, acted like an ass.
Now, ghastcaller, that’s actually has a much larger pool of possible drops (24 I believe) and outside of modifiers like baron only spawns 2 minions 1 time. So assuming maybe 3 good drops out of 24 (death rattle build and ignoring burgurgle and galakrond since they are situational) then no that’s caller is less consistent than imp mama.
I look forward to well formatted responses and what I assume from you will an angry, arrogant, deplorable response that continues to assume my intentions outside of my actual words.
just stumbled upon this via google. I have to agree that his response was harsh, but one can clearly read out of your post that you were salty while posting this coz ur win just got "stolen" from you. So he has a point and you should get of your high horse as well, which is pretty hypocritical because you then act even worse by insulting him back lol
You necro’d a post from March to say that and you want to talk about being on a high horse. Jesus get over yourself,