Can't decide... I prefer to play mage tbh. But, got my secret tempo mage which I enjoy.. So the question is if I should go for the Skull so I can make a fun warlock deck as well... I'm having a hard time with decisions so I'd appreciate if you guys share your thoughts of the cards etc.
Also, got a golden Oakheart... Is he a big plus for either Mage or Warlocks? If not I'm thinking about dusting him, share thoughts on this as well please!
oakheart is very good in control warlock, so if you assign any value to gold cards and plan on playing control warlock, he's good to keep
control warlock is quite expensive, but it's also incredibly fun, so check if you've got the dust to craft it and i'm sure you'd enjoy it if you went for it. i don't think big spell mage and alanna are that great, and i'd probably craft control warlock if i were you
@Whammerist Bloodreaver seems good enough to skip Oakheart? Or am I wrong?
Yeah, thinking about control warlock... Rin is also a big plus right? Tried learning a bit about how she is in decks etc but, people was negative against her and now everyone's surprised how well it works!
But the skull is clearly a prio over Rin, I suppose?
@Markie2282 He seems very... slow to me? I mean, bloodreaver already does enough?
I would not craft/disenchant yet. All of the legendaries you mentioned are seeing play and their value is up for debate. The meta is far from settled and rapidly shifting. The legendary crafting thread is having some serious discussions about the value of some of those legendaries right now and while I'd encourage you to be part of the discussion, I wouldn't recommend you dust a playable legendary for another just yet.
I got golden Oakheart too, but I'd not dust it just yet. I think the meta isn't just refined that well to judge if Oakheart reached his full potential with the current standard cards. And he might really shine after an expansion or two.
On the other hand I highly dislike golden cards (with few exceptions) and Oakheart is probably the card with the most underwhelming golden animation ever. On top of that I really don't think dusting golden leg is bad b/c if you want to recraft it you don't lose any dust but the silly animation. If you're short on gold/dust just DE it to get the thing you wanna play.
Ah, yes, gold sorta changes things and I'm with you on the dislike for gold cards. In that case it's a little more up in the air on dusting or not but what to craft in it's stead is still a bit of a tossup. If you're willing to save the dust you could go ahead but it could also give you crafting temptation.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Can't decide... I prefer to play mage tbh. But, got my secret tempo mage which I enjoy.. So the question is if I should go for the Skull so I can make a fun warlock deck as well... I'm having a hard time with decisions so I'd appreciate if you guys share your thoughts of the cards etc.
Also, got a golden Oakheart... Is he a big plus for either Mage or Warlocks? If not I'm thinking about dusting him, share thoughts on this as well please!
/Thanks :)
Master Oakheart absolutely insane in warlock right now pulling Voidlord and such from your deck for free
oakheart is very good in control warlock, so if you assign any value to gold cards and plan on playing control warlock, he's good to keep
control warlock is quite expensive, but it's also incredibly fun, so check if you've got the dust to craft it and i'm sure you'd enjoy it if you went for it. i don't think big spell mage and alanna are that great, and i'd probably craft control warlock if i were you
I don't think Oakheart is good enough for warlock, The card is fine but really won't make the cut in a couple of weeks.
@Whammerist Bloodreaver seems good enough to skip Oakheart? Or am I wrong?
Yeah, thinking about control warlock... Rin is also a big plus right? Tried learning a bit about how she is in decks etc but, people was negative against her and now everyone's surprised how well it works!
But the skull is clearly a prio over Rin, I suppose?
@Markie2282 He seems very... slow to me? I mean, bloodreaver already does enough?
I would not craft/disenchant yet. All of the legendaries you mentioned are seeing play and their value is up for debate. The meta is far from settled and rapidly shifting. The legendary crafting thread is having some serious discussions about the value of some of those legendaries right now and while I'd encourage you to be part of the discussion, I wouldn't recommend you dust a playable legendary for another just yet.
I got golden Oakheart too, but I'd not dust it just yet. I think the meta isn't just refined that well to judge if Oakheart reached his full potential with the current standard cards. And he might really shine after an expansion or two.
On the other hand I highly dislike golden cards (with few exceptions) and Oakheart is probably the card with the most underwhelming golden animation ever. On top of that I really don't think dusting golden leg is bad b/c if you want to recraft it you don't lose any dust but the silly animation. If you're short on gold/dust just DE it to get the thing you wanna play.
Ah, yes, gold sorta changes things and I'm with you on the dislike for gold cards. In that case it's a little more up in the air on dusting or not but what to craft in it's stead is still a bit of a tossup. If you're willing to save the dust you could go ahead but it could also give you crafting temptation.