i like this card. this card is not about getting tempo or a good mana value the turn you play it. it's about getting card advantage and unleashing a massive amount of beasts on your opponent. you use only two card spots in your deck, to essentially get 12 minions. if the rest of your deck is full of beast snyergy and low mana cost cards, you may control the board till turn 6, hit a little speed bump, and then continue pushing beasts in your opponents face.
i don't know, could work i think. i'm really looking forward to experimenting with this card.
oh, and as some mentioned, the feign death synergy could be huge.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Knowledge, or verbal facility, is no proof that you know what you're talking about." -Terence Mckenna
I'm ready to eat my words, but this card won't see any play. That far into the game getting 3 1/1s changes precisely nothing, and drawing 3 random beasts (which usually are pretty weak) is nothing solid too. In what scenario would you play this over... well, anything? Over Piloted Sky Golem or Highmane, generators of sick board presence? Sylvanas, which forces your opponent to unfavourably trade? Emperor? Playing 3 1/1s for six mana and hoping that you won't get crappy beasts - and you will, since 75% of webspinners outcomes are crappy beasts - is just like using steady shot on your own face.
Don't get me wrong, I love Webspinner, it's a card I immediately gilded up to golden when it came out. But 1 webspinner for 1 mana is good (forcing a turn 2 ping isn't horrible, drawing even a Croco for it is awesome), 3 webspinners for 6 is just horrible. If this card costed 4 mana then maybe it could be competitive, but definitely not at 6.
I'm not sure why there's this huge debate of whether or not 6 mana is worth it for the stats and card draw. It's three webspinners. That costs 3 mana. As it's a bundle deal, it could probably cost 4. But 6 mana? No. I'll pass.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"I wouldn't anticipate seeing much of doctor boom" - Trump 2014
"I myself am not too hopeful about the Grim Patron deck" - Trump 2015
"(Secret Paladin) didn't work out and I don't think Mysterious Challenger will change that." - Trump 2015
"(Darkshire Councilman) takes a bit too long to get set up...bad" - Trump 2016
the card would be auto include for 4, balanced for 5 but for 6 Mana? No way this is going to be played......IF there wont be any new cool Hunter Cards which helps you stall the game early or midgame.
This card is way to slow. This Card is no game change midgame, only good for give you enough cards for the endgame.....
Another comparison for this card is Neptulon ... 7/7 body + 4 probably not that good cards for 7 mana Vs 3 1/1 silenceable Minions + 3 probably not that good cards for 6 mana.
Okay Neptulon has Overload (3) but people who defend this cards are talking about the topdeck war (so this isn't very important) Moreover 4 Murlocs have in most cases better synergy together than 3 beast cards. Yeah I know 2 different cards etc etc.. roughly you can still compare them in that comparison Neptulonis way better (and everyone hated him when he was revealed)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Who can take your trash out? Stomp it down for you? Shake the plastic bag and do the twisty thingy, too?
Indeed. There are many bundle cards in the game. Sludge Belcher is one, a Tazdingo that spawns a Goldshire Footman. 4mana+1mana=5 mana, the Belchers cost. It would never be played for 6 mana, too pricy, and you can grab a Sunwalker for this slot. Dragonling mechanic gives you a body with 3 mana value, and another with 1 mana value, total 4 mana for a Dragonling Mechanic. And bringing Doctor Boom up in this scenario is just cruel.
Here, for some reason, we pay 3 mana for a bundle deal?
I think this card is quite underrated. Just imagine what this card actually does: You draw 3 Cards and get 3 1/1 Tokens für 6 Mana. 3 Token is worth 2 Mana (Snake Trap) and Drawing 3 Cards is ~4 Mana (Compare this to Nourish and Arcane intellekt), so 6 Mana is totally fine.
I makes Cards like Hunter's Mark better und gives you the carddraw you need to play a control game. The only problem I see is that it compents with the Overpowered Savannah Highmane who cost also 6 Mana, so the new card will be more like a one-of, especially if you play Thaurissan and/or Sylvanas on top of it.
Maybe 5 Mana would be fair, but 4 Mana is absolutley rediculous bullshit, srsly.
I think this card is quite underrated. Just imagine what this card actually does: You draw 3 Cards and get 3 1/1 Tokens für 6 Mana. 3 Token is worth 2 Mana (Snake Trap) and Drawing 3 Cards is ~4 Mana (Compare this to Nourish and Arcane intellekt), so 6 Mana is totally fine.
I makes Cards like Hunter's Mark better und gives you the carddraw you need to play a control game. The only problem I see is the Overpowered Savannah Highmane who cost also 6 Mana, so the new card will be more like a one-of, especially if you play Thaurissan.
Maybe 5 Mana would be fair, but 4 Mana is absolutley rediculous, srsly.
The Webspinner's DR is not equal to drawing a card though. Because a.) It only draws a specific type of card and b.) it doesn't draw from your deck, so no deck thinning, no guaranteed synergy and a lot of RNG. This card could cost three mana and it would still not be insane. Probably because it's hunter it should cost 4.
Like it's three webspinners. 1+2+3. There's nothing more to it than that. This card is - no exaggeration - the worst card in the game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"I wouldn't anticipate seeing much of doctor boom" - Trump 2014
"I myself am not too hopeful about the Grim Patron deck" - Trump 2015
"(Secret Paladin) didn't work out and I don't think Mysterious Challenger will change that." - Trump 2015
"(Darkshire Councilman) takes a bit too long to get set up...bad" - Trump 2016
The Webspinner's DR is not equal to drawing a card though. Because a.) It only draws a specific type of card and b.) it doesn't draw from your deck, so no deck thinning, no guaranteed synergy and a lot of RNG. This card could cost three mana and it would still not be insane. Probably because it's hunter it should cost 4.
That you don't draw the cards from your actual Deck is an Upside in control mirrors. Yes, the "Drawing effect" is random, but still good enough. Don't forget all the beast synergies you get with the Webspinners AND the beasts.
And the part with the "3 Mana" must be a joke lol. For 3 Mana it would be the new pre nerf Unleash the Hounds.
Overpriced. For 6 mana u get 3 1/1 minions. Yea, it can refill ur hand, but u can't control what u get. I think it should cost 4 mana max. Highmane is better choice - 3 minions for 6 mana too.
Ball of Spiders costs 6 mana because Emperor Thaurissan exist.
I kid.
I see this card somewhat playable at 5 mana, exploitable at 4. So... I will try this out in my control hunter.
"Are you not entertained?! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity." - Maximus Decimus Meridius
An additional problem is, that while Sprint gives you cards only in your deck, Ball of Spiders gives you random cards.
Now, I am not saying the card is crap, since I respect the power of Neptulon too. So I guess I will see.
"Are you not entertained?! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity." - Maximus Decimus Meridius
i like this card. this card is not about getting tempo or a good mana value the turn you play it. it's about getting card advantage and unleashing a massive amount of beasts on your opponent. you use only two card spots in your deck, to essentially get 12 minions. if the rest of your deck is full of beast snyergy and low mana cost cards, you may control the board till turn 6, hit a little speed bump, and then continue pushing beasts in your opponents face.
i don't know, could work i think. i'm really looking forward to experimenting with this card.
oh, and as some mentioned, the feign death synergy could be huge.
"Knowledge, or verbal facility, is no proof that you know what you're talking about." -Terence Mckenna
I'm ready to eat my words, but this card won't see any play. That far into the game getting 3 1/1s changes precisely nothing, and drawing 3 random beasts (which usually are pretty weak) is nothing solid too. In what scenario would you play this over... well, anything? Over Piloted Sky Golem or Highmane, generators of sick board presence? Sylvanas, which forces your opponent to unfavourably trade? Emperor? Playing 3 1/1s for six mana and hoping that you won't get crappy beasts - and you will, since 75% of webspinners outcomes are crappy beasts - is just like using steady shot on your own face.
Don't get me wrong, I love Webspinner, it's a card I immediately gilded up to golden when it came out. But 1 webspinner for 1 mana is good (forcing a turn 2 ping isn't horrible, drawing even a Croco for it is awesome), 3 webspinners for 6 is just horrible. If this card costed 4 mana then maybe it could be competitive, but definitely not at 6.
I like how Blizzard is telling hunters that "FACE IS THE PLACE" - SMOrc
I'm not sure why there's this huge debate of whether or not 6 mana is worth it for the stats and card draw. It's three webspinners. That costs 3 mana. As it's a bundle deal, it could probably cost 4. But 6 mana? No. I'll pass.
Looks overpriced but it is OK to me. Synergizes well with Feign Death.
In aggro or mid-range, you can play this, or Savannah Highmane in the same slot.
Highmane is really good. This is not. Filler card.
So you're telling me that I can put three minions on the board that draw me three cards? I'm game.
Honestly, it understand the price. Even at 4 it would be overpowered because you still end up drawing 3 beasts.
Give a man a Murloc, and he'll eat for a day.
Give him a Murloc Knight, and people will hate him.
the card would be auto include for 4, balanced for 5 but for 6 Mana? No way this is going to be played......IF there wont be any new cool Hunter Cards which helps you stall the game early or midgame.
This card is way to slow. This Card is no game change midgame, only good for give you enough cards for the endgame.....
Another comparison for this card is Neptulon ... 7/7 body + 4 probably not that good cards for 7 mana Vs 3 1/1 silenceable Minions + 3 probably not that good cards for 6 mana.
Okay Neptulon has Overload (3) but people who defend this cards are talking about the topdeck war (so this isn't very important)
Moreover 4 Murlocs have in most cases better synergy together than 3 beast cards.
Yeah I know 2 different cards etc etc.. roughly you can still compare them in that comparison Neptulonis way better (and everyone hated him when he was revealed)
Who can take your trash out?
Stomp it down for you?
Shake the plastic bag
and do the twisty thingy, too?
Cool spell to get from random effects, but too expensive for constructed.
I could accept it if it played the 3 spinners right away for you, but atm it seems a tad bit too slow.
Other than that, a fun card i'll probably use just because its fun :P
Indeed. There are many bundle cards in the game. Sludge Belcher is one, a Tazdingo that spawns a Goldshire Footman. 4mana+1mana=5 mana, the Belchers cost. It would never be played for 6 mana, too pricy, and you can grab a Sunwalker for this slot. Dragonling mechanic gives you a body with 3 mana value, and another with 1 mana value, total 4 mana for a Dragonling Mechanic. And bringing Doctor Boom up in this scenario is just cruel.
Here, for some reason, we pay 3 mana for a bundle deal?
I think this card is quite underrated. Just imagine what this card actually does: You draw 3 Cards and get 3 1/1 Tokens für 6 Mana. 3 Token is worth 2 Mana (Snake Trap) and Drawing 3 Cards is ~4 Mana (Compare this to Nourish and Arcane intellekt), so 6 Mana is totally fine.
I makes Cards like Hunter's Mark better und gives you the carddraw you need to play a control game. The only problem I see is that it compents with the Overpowered Savannah Highmane who cost also 6 Mana, so the new card will be more like a one-of, especially if you play Thaurissan and/or Sylvanas on top of it.
Maybe 5 Mana would be fair, but 4 Mana is absolutley rediculous bullshit, srsly.
The Webspinner's DR is not equal to drawing a card though. Because a.) It only draws a specific type of card and b.) it doesn't draw from your deck, so no deck thinning, no guaranteed synergy and a lot of RNG. This card could cost three mana and it would still not be insane. Probably because it's hunter it should cost 4.
Like it's three webspinners. 1+2+3. There's nothing more to it than that. This card is - no exaggeration - the worst card in the game.
This card will not be played i don't think unless its in some whacky control variant. Its too slow to fit into the current architecture of hunter
That you don't draw the cards from your actual Deck is an Upside in control mirrors. Yes, the "Drawing effect" is random, but still good enough. Don't forget all the beast synergies you get with the Webspinners AND the beasts.
And the part with the "3 Mana" must be a joke lol. For 3 Mana it would be the new pre nerf Unleash the Hounds.
Overpriced. For 6 mana u get 3 1/1 minions. Yea, it can refill ur hand, but u can't control what u get. I think it should cost 4 mana max. Highmane is better choice - 3 minions for 6 mana too.
should be 4 mana the webspinners are worth 3 mana the bundle +1 mana.. it's snake trap (2 mana) as webspinners
. they are just too scared of starving buzzard?