• 1

    posted a message on why isn't the gem on common's green?

    In wow, green is Uncommon.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Make the Card

     

    Originally it was just going to be add a random one to your hand, but that'd be more broken than Auctioneer. Toxin cards are the same as the ones Xaril, Poisoned Mind generates.

    Next: Something to do with tribal synergy.

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 0

    posted a message on Make the Card

    Next: Something that counters one of your current decks. Name the deck in your post.

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 0

    posted a message on GJ Team 5.

    The hunter DK isn't undercosted.

    It costs 6 mana to cast and two mana to use a hero power that initially does nothing that turn (that's a total of 8 mana, just like Anduin, just like Garrosh, and one more than Malfurion). You guys seem to have this bizarre perspective that the two mana that goes into creating a beast (again mana spent that does nothing, unlike Anduin or Malfurion) doesn't count towards the dk's mana cost. It's not like the two mana spent creating the zombeast actually reduces the cost of the beast. It's a two mana do nothing.

     It's 2 mana draw a card, but don't move towards fatigue and the card is better than the average card.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on GJ Team 5.
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

     Fair enough, it is a matter of opinion.  Saying all experts disagree is total hyperbole though.  Source for this?

     I am all expert players and I disagree.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on GJ Team 5.
    Quote from Reinan23 >>

    My 5 last games was turn 2 secret , turn 3 secret , turn 4 coin spellstone, i instantly concede when i saw the coin i dont even want to see the actual card that's how upset i'm right now lol i'm a rogue player only so 0 chances to answer that which i believe it's such a fail approach for the rogue perspective, this class should be good at AoE it makes no sense to me.

    It's just very frustrating to face hunter over and over again for a rogue player like me so i'll be forced to not play the game until April, sadly because i love my deck and i believe it's super strong but it just dont have any chance against hunter also struggle against other slower ones because it's a minion base deck and they are all building their decks to beat hunter with a billion of AoE, i just faced a priest that AoE me for 8 times it was one of the most disgusting games i've had.

     Stop attacking into Wandering Monster and the matchup becomes decent.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Control is boring for everyone but control
    Quote from Carfusso >>

     Fair enough,still i think it's the lesser of 2 evils,i mean,when i Build a deck i want to play the cards i put in It, All of them, not the First 10 or so i happen to draw,otherwise why were the others in the deck? Therefore having some deck prolongueing the game (WITHOUT going infinite) Is still healthier than decks that win/lose super fast and healthier than others that simply powerdraw and win or get SMORC'd and lose

     Doesn't Powerdraw mean you end up playing all the cards in your deck?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Make the Card

    Next: A card featuring some green dragon in the art.

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 0

    posted a message on Control is boring for everyone but control
    Quote from Isrin22 >>

    You face a lot of control decks because they are answers for all these brainless hunter decks. :P

     No they aren't, Deathstalker outvalues any Control deck eventually (except old Kingsbane, but too bad).

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Control is boring for everyone but control
    Quote from Kaladin >>

    aggro is boring for anyone but aggro

    midrange is boring for anyone but midrange

    combo is boring for anyone but combo

    Is this meant to be a discussion or just a salt post?

     That's not how midrange works. Midrange entirely relies on two-sided interaction.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Current Meta is too slow
    Quote from maroon5five >>

     That would make for a very boring game. If every matchup is aggro vs aggro the game gets stale after a day or two, just like the game would get stale if only control existed and every matchup was control vs control.

     No it wouldn't? Aggro vs Aggro is the only matchup that isn't a foregone conclusion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Current Meta is too slow
    Quote from maroon5five >>

     I guess in your world that control decks and combo decks shouldn't exist at all? 

     Correct.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Current Meta is too slow
    Quote from DarthSecuro >>

    Wtf, I dont get it how people can enjoy playing brainless odd paladin or tempo rogue instead of control and combo decks. Its waay more interesting than just hitting face...

     In what way? Draw cards until you win?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on The worst way to nerf hunter?!?

    All hunter Secrets now cost 3 mana. Don't @ me.

    Posted in: Hunter
  • 0

    posted a message on What do you think about Rastakhan?

    I don't hate it, there's a lot of decent tier 2/3 decks out of it. There's not you can do in terms of deckbuilding though, most of the decks pretty much build themselves.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.