• 2

    posted a message on Favorite Hearthstone Card and why?

     Mal'Ganis

     

    I mean, he makes you immune! How cool is that?!

    Also he's a turtle.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on How far does Hearthpwn think this Jade arena will go?
    Quote from Kuko_2245 >>

    Why would you use old OSX? 

     Because I'm lazy
    Posted in: The Arena
  • 0

    posted a message on How far does Hearthpwn think this Jade arena will go?

    9 wins is my estimate

    Posted in: The Arena
  • 2

    posted a message on 26-3 on ladder with this Discardlock
    Quote from whycup >>
    Quote from TachiiDerp >>

    I highly doubt this lol

    I tried zoo before and it fails horrifically against aggro since shaman/warrior just aggros better. Knife juggler doesn't even make that much sense without forbidden ritual or any great way to flood the board.

     So you didn`t even try, ok, make your assumptions.
     "I tried zoo"
    Dear OP, are you blind?
    Zoo and discardlock are basically synonymous these days as discardlock is the only viable zoo deck. 
    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 8

    posted a message on In the Defence of Small-time Buccaneer
    Quote from Shadowotter >>

    This thread is dedicated to defending the honor and dignity of our favorite card: Small-Time Buccaneer

    And debating why this card shouldn't be nerfed.

    I will start:

    I just played as a priest versus a pirate warrior - he killed me turn 4

    But he never even played a Small-Time Buccaneer.

    Small-time buccaneer is awesome and a flame imp pirates deserve.

     The amount of ignorance in this post is hilarious. 
    You might as well say (insert card) isn't broken because you lost against (insert deck) at turn X.
    Just because you STILL lose super fast against pirate warrior even when they don't play a small time, DOESN'T mean that small time isn't part of the problem.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Should Blizzard Ban Players? Decks?

    Literally face decks are the only thing saving the meta. Control can't deal with jade idol and without aggro jade Druid rules the meta. This forum should have been a post in the salt forum

     Without aggro miracle rogue becomes meta, pushing back both jade and control, while still being a deck that requires skill and can be played around, unlike aggro.
    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Should Blizzard Ban Players? Decks?
    Quote from dr3amb3ing >>

    Dumb post, go to the salt forum. Stay getting rekt by aggro decks, I exclusively only Pirate warriors to induce salt in people like you

     me go face face so u cri 
    - dr3amb3ing, Rank: special needs
    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Opinions on Dragon Synergy: Is it a noob trap?

    How did you leave out Drakonid op?

    Posted in: The Arena
  • 0

    posted a message on Ben Brode you have failed us all

    What I find hilarious about comparing mtg to hearthstone when it comes to banning is that people don't seem to understand it whatsoever. First of all, when cards get banned in mtg it is almost always because of a broken combo, not because of a 4 mana 7/7 esq card. For this reason A LOT less cards actually need to get banned for the deck to fall apart and be unplayable. Whenever a card is banned in any format it's on the equivalent scale of banning Malygos or Leeroy Jenkins, cards that enable insane combo's. For example splinter twin was banned because it let you tap a creature to create a copy of itself, then you would use it on a creature with an etb trigger of untapping a creature, essentially letting you create infinite charge minions. 

    Cards need to be better managed when it comes to balancing in hearthstone. Blizzard releases a massive quantity of.. 100ish cards, most of which are vanilla filler minions, where as Wizards balances entire new mechanics in an average of 200 cards, almost all unique and playable in limited.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 27

    posted a message on Ben Brode: "We might rotate cards out of Classic"

    This move so so so bad for blizzard. 0% trust for the devs now.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on complaints about netdecking in Casual

    If they removed the possibility of making gold in casual it would be fine

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Nerf Hunter
    Quote from KitsuneRTC >>

    Now that i've got your attention, stop making stupid nerf threads you callous dunder nuggets.

     

    /endrant

     

    ------->You WON'T BELIEVE this reply <-------
    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
    ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Ask yourself, do you really want a 30 minute game?
    Quote from Sahgos >>

    I've played thousands of games over the last two+ years and have probably had less than ten games where someone intentionally roped me.  This isn't an issue.

     That is as big a lie as sun titan is a good cube card.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What happened with hunter?

    The problem with adding a new secret card (exclusively for hunter) is that it completely rekts wild. Secret hunter is a tier 1 deck in wild right now and having a FIFTH synergy card would be ridiculous.

    Eaglehorn Bow, Mad Scientist, Cloaked Huntress, Secret keeper. <- 

    Posted in: Hunter
  • 0

    posted a message on $$ required and crappy PvE
    Quote from mindgamezzz >>

    Sadly Hearthstone forces you to play different decks. This isn't like MtG where you just buy a tier one deck in modern or legacy and master it. They encourage deck building.

     Lel niec jokE 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.