Hearthpwn

5 easy wins for my weekly, no loss. thanks.

I'd change the description to "hard mulligan for bloodlust" though...

Thanks for the list. Took out both Psychic Screams, replaced them with Kel'Thuzad and Shadow Essence.

Beat Rafaam & Galakrond on the 1st try with that.

Used this against Waxrider, worked as advertised (although I nearly threw my notebook across the room when Shadow Essence gave me a 5/5 Weasel...)

Turn 3 going second. Thanks for the deck :)

I am more than willing to pay money for extra content, and I am also fine with the current price and reward structure for those adventures.
But why on earth should I pay 5€ for a random Legendary and a Card Back?

Quote from mistermath314 >>

Actually, if I recall correctly, you do die. Multiple threads and videos were made complaining about Amara's text and its interaction with Auchenai Soulpriest, where it actually did 40 damage to you if you had it on board. I'm surprised it doesn't work with priest quest, since by the same logic it should.

 That was a bug. They fixed this some time ago already

I don't quite see the win condition here. The deck looks extremely defensive and doesn't pack a lot of punch.
Maybe you'd like to take a look at the deck in my signature, similar concept but way heavier on the minions.

Quote from Arivaali >>

I would avoid using any cheat programs like this. If you do not mind losing your account because of this, do use it then.

 Blizzard clearly stated a couple of years ago, that any software doing stuff that could also be achieved with a pen and a piece of paper was totally fine. Therefore, Hearthstone Deck Tracker and Innkeeper are both fair game, as long as you don't mind putting up with the bugs that are still in them (e.g. not showing cpies that were shuffled into your deck through Spirit of the Dead).

Quote from fugbucker >>

Quote from pcjacob314 >>

The pack is worth more than 60 gold so you def aren't "losing value". Spoken like a true Hearthstoner tho

 That’s not true here’s another example to illustrate.

imagine you and your twin sibling are each given a daily allowance for one dollar.  your parents also have a rule that you can’t have more than three dollars at any given time.  you and your twin each save up 3$ over 3 days and then go to the store. He buys two sodas for a dollar each  and you buy just one, leaving him with one dollar and you have two.  The next day your parents say hey you guys are such good kids here’s an extra dollar for each of you except since you have two dollars still left over you can only get one dollar but your twin gets both. Now he’s netted 5$ and you only got 4$

That example is just a bad one and does in no way translate to HS Quests.
In the example given the kids get the same value each day. With the quest, you get different value each day.

Let's rewrite your example to be more accurate, shall we?
Imagine you and your twin sibling are each given a daily chore that pays a certain amount of allowance when done. Some pay 50ct, some 60ct and some rare ones even pay $1.
Your parents let both of you randomly draw one chore per day. You can choose to do the chore right away and get your allowance or you can choose to do it at a later time.
Each day, one saved chore from previous days can be put back into the hat to redraw a new one, maybe giving you one that's more valuable.
They also have a rule that you can’t have more than three chores at any given time.

You try to max your allowance, therefore you only do 50ct chores when you have to make space. Your brother doesn't care and does chores when he has time for it.
One day, you and your twin each save up 3 chores over 3 days as you were doing other stuff the previous days. Then you decide to do some of the chores. He does two, you decide to only do one.
The next day your parents say "Hey you guys are such good kids here’s an extra chore for each of you that's worth $1. However, the rule for maximum of three chores is still in place." You then have to put back one of your 50ct chores in order to receive the $1 chore.
On this very day, your bonus chore is indeed giving you a loss of 50ct. Over the long run, being the geedy sibling and trying to max your profit, you probably didn't lose anything except for some freedom as you are constantly fussing about the chores and trying to micromanage this.
Maybe you should just enjoy the fact that your parents give you an allowance and that they are willing to give extra bonuses from time to time.

Quote from fugbucker >>

I’m curious, how many of you that don’t understand where the value is lost play mech hunter?

 I don't know how that is relevant, but just to satisfy your curiosity, I am currently playing a homebrew Priest Deathrattle Hakkar deck in Wild and Plot Twist Warlock in Standard. On top of that, I am trying to make the deck work that you can find in my signature.

Never disenchant golden cards that give you other cards, as those will be golden as well. Moar gold!

You're welcome. Feel free to share your experience :)

Probably a Shiv :)

Now we are talking :)

I get what you are saying. However, I woudn't necessarily consider Spirit of the Shark to be the go-to T6-play, as I don't think it necessarily needs to be comboed with Barista Lynchen. I'd be more than happy to drop it on curve to be followed up next turn by either a Witchwood Piper or Pogo-Hopper into Lab Recruiter. Both lines of play should help you for the upcoming turns.

Sample size in your link is way too low to make a valid assumption. 490 games with the shark-less deck, come on...

With all those Battlecries, how about adding Spirit of the Shark? Two might be too much, but one should be fine.