oneof the autoincludes in most decks and a reason to play mech decks ... sigh ... Play shaman or mage and put in polymorphs if you don´t play mechs ...
my most sucessful deck was a rush warrior combined with control. Rush synergieses greatly with control style. I am shure this deck works well. I don´t have Akali and i feel its one of the strongest cards here. But mybe i try such a deck.
Two giants is a problem. Two Grave Horrors is a MUCH bigger problem. If they get a Grave Horror off that first early Conj they can stabilize against aggro.
The combo doesn't always go down super early but it's really powerful in the midgame too. Early is bad, but in the midgame they might be able to cast it twice or cast with Khadgar. There aren't a lot of answers to the big Khadgar boards just like there aren't many answers to Nomi.
They don't just draw the combo cards. They can tutor Giant with Sandbinder. They can generate Conj with Cyclone. It's a really powerful deck with lots of options.
This. When i did see cyclone i wanted to craft a deck but needed the cyclone´s so i hesitated but a week later i did it and combined a cyclone mage with Khadgar. The deck is very powerful. I even play only one giant but double sandbinder and cyclone ...
i don´t play shaman in wild XD ... I played a mage deck for fun that destroyed big priests and was good against other lower decks. Well it had 6 cards that polymorphed minions .... And my mill druid also wins.
i did beat warriors in that long mates but Archivist RNG decided a lot of games. I droped her for too long matches but that also means i will loose some games due to the armor wall.
0
just killed like 20 pogo abominations till loosing in elysiana´s endgame ... to another "onehit" pogo.
1
oneof the autoincludes in most decks and a reason to play mech decks ... sigh ... Play shaman or mage and put in polymorphs if you don´t play mechs ...
0
making it twinspell was OP as hell ... Even without it´s a top combo card.
0
Thanx for writing. I am currently trying my eye of the Tiger paladin. I miss Kangor, Thekal and Shirvallah to try such a deck. :-)
0
Is 5 cards a must ? A stable deck often variers only by 2-3 cards.
0
my most sucessful deck was a rush warrior combined with control. Rush synergieses greatly with control style. I am shure this deck works well. I don´t have Akali and i feel its one of the strongest cards here. But mybe i try such a deck.
0
thanx i take a look.
0
Where do i find a good site/description to join Tourneys. Especially EU ?
0
change echo to rush and it would still be great but can´t run out of control.
1
it´s a broken, bonkers card. Even if magnetic is removed.
0
This. When i did see cyclone i wanted to craft a deck but needed the cyclone´s so i hesitated but a week later i did it and combined a cyclone mage with Khadgar. The deck is very powerful. I even play only one giant but double sandbinder and cyclone ...
0
i don´t play shaman in wild XD ... I played a mage deck for fun that destroyed big priests and was good against other lower decks. Well it had 6 cards that polymorphed minions .... And my mill druid also wins.
0
i did beat warriors in that long mates but Archivist RNG decided a lot of games. I droped her for too long matches but that also means i will loose some games due to the armor wall.
0
i just miss that they have they guts to HOF the heros. This would have made it. But those are so popular that they don´t dare....
and i miss twinspell removed from Conjurer's Calling ... This card is OP and basically autoinclude in mage decks...
0
did´t vote due to this being so minor that we will hardly be noticed. Raiding party and prep are the real nerfs we will feel.