Hearthpwn

Cringy reveals lmao. Having more fun on this rather the game itself.

Edit: People are overhyped lol.

Pity timer classic card: 40 packs for Millhouse Manastorm .
What a troll by Blizzard

I just face the same, boring netdecks over and over and over.

You sad, pathetic little fucks running odd Pally, zoolock with heals, that handlock warlock that runs the 6/6 demons and giants, and that deathrattle recruit hunter. It's fucking pathetic you can't play your own decks, and I have ZERO respect for your win or your rank you little fucks. And leave the emotes alone - just keep stroking  your little peens.

Quote from Xetrov >>

Cringy reveals lmao. Having more fun on this rather the game itself.

Edit: People are overhyped lol.

 i wouldn't say being now able to have multiple bloodreaver guldans and unlimited minions with that new warlock legendary is "overhyped" one bit

utter insanity.  it was a topdeck.

edit: wow i really should stop posting preemptively.  i won out of some pretty lucky topdecks myself.

Quote from Dragonsscars >>

Quote from Evil_B >>

Blizzard has really amped it up a notch. I get mulligans that I couldn't hand pick any better. Draws on curve, top deck winners galore. Unfortunately the game has become completely mindless. Just empty your hand and top deck the game winner. Boring. 

 Imagine that:
you stay tempo, draw excellent, but your opponent is a Quest mage in wild and has access to up to 10 ice block.

 I am simply amazed at the true believers that somehow think that the laws of probability are for some reason suspended in Hearthstone. Perfect draw after perfect draw. That's like saying it is statistically possible to roll a seven on two dice 1,000 times in a row so if you see it happen it must be legit. 

I'm not going to bother going back a couple pages to find the quote, but allow me to say, if there is manipulated RNG I have in fact beaten it every single month this game has been out (except last month (feels bad)).  Either that, or Blizzard put me in the special column despite me not streaming or in any way promoting the game.

Maybe it's just that I'm a good player.

However, though I am, and though I have, and though there's always wonderful things in this thread to laugh at, I am in fact quite salty.  I am salty because someone managed to trigger me so hard in the Jan'alai thread that I actually just wrote a proof on a god damn gaming forum to substantiate the argument that if you've done 9 damage, you have in fact done 8 damage.

I think I need a second job.

Quote from Evil_B >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Quote from Evil_B >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

The First Amendment of the US Constitution protects you in-that the government is not allowed to put forth a law infringing on your ability to speak up. It doesn't protect you from consequences when you saying something stupid or hurtful in a public setting, or on a privately-owned and operated website.

You are free to say what you want...you are not free to say what you want with zero repercussions in all situations.

 What exactly are the consequences of stupid or hurtful speech?

 Well it obviously depends on the situation. Megyn Kelly put her foot in her mouth, said something racist and it cost her her TV show; doing it here will lead to a report, causing me or another mod to instill a warning that may end with a ban. It could go even further, as well: yelling "Fire!" in a theater under false pretenses could get you arrested.

If the intention behind your question is closer to "who am I really hurting when I say things that are presumably 'hurtful'?", then I don't know how to respond without relying on a sarcastic, passive-aggressive quip regarding your lack of empathy or common decency toward others. I would have figured the answer to be self-evident, but perhaps I am wrong in this case.

...Or maybe I'm over-analyzing the inflection in your sentence, to which I apologize and you can disregard the second paragraph.

 My point is that there are no legal consequences to stupid or hurtful speech. In fact is exactly what freedom of speech protects. If no one was offended then there would be no reason to protect free speech. 

 It depends on the situation and context, not all speech is protected and there are definitely consequences to stupid or hurtful speech, ask Rosanne Barr. You can't work at a McDonald's drive-thru window and ask the customer " Hey asshole, what the fuck you want?" You will get fired. There are also civil penalties a jury can impose on you for certain types of speech deemed liable.

Jesus fuck this game so obviously adjusts ladder matchmaking based on your deck contents.

As soon as I take a weird deck onto ladder with strange card choices, I start running into weird decks to match up with. Last two games have been a Druid running Harrison which removed Jaraxxus's weapon and then a Hunter running double bestial wrath which gave them lethal. I'm supposed to play around those sorts of includes? Yesterday I made a Rogue with questing adventurers and second game I got matched with a Rogue also running that card.  

FUCKING LYING CUMWADS THAT ARE BLIZZARD - NEVER SPEND REAL MONEY ON THIS PIECE OF SHIT GAME.    

these fucking rank 5 gatekeepers.

Quote from Shadowrisen >>

I'm not going to bother going back a couple pages to find the quote, but allow me to say, if there is manipulated RNG I have in fact beaten it every single month this game has been out (except last month (feels bad)).  Either that, or Blizzard put me in the special column despite me not streaming or in any way promoting the game.

Maybe it's just that I'm a good player.

However, though I am, and though I have, and though there's always wonderful things in this thread to laugh at, I am in fact quite salty.  I am salty because someone managed to trigger me so hard in the Jan'alai thread that I actually just wrote a proof on a god damn gaming forum to substantiate the argument that if you've done 9 damage, you have in fact done 8 damage.

I think I need a second job.

 That's like saying "I'm good at flipping a coin".

I can tell with 80%+ accuracy who is going to win the game by the mulligan I get. So I knew I was going to lose this particular game. As I have said recently Blizzard has ratcheted up the manipulation to attract new players and this was evident as on turn 4 the rogue I was playing plays Faldorei Strider (of course). Turn 5 he draws 3 of the 4 spiders he just shuffled in.

They aren't even trying anymore. 

Not a single paladin card for my deck, seems terrible.

Ok, maybe I'd use Shirvallah, the Tiger. But 25 mana is unreal cost for my deck and also 10 mana without that discount wording would be ok, as it is just a bigger Zilliax, without Magnetic, Taunt and Mech tribe.

theres a recently released neutral legendary that cheats out beasts from your hand, so the 25 mana cost means nothing 

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

theres a recently released neutral legendary that cheats out beasts from your hand, so the 25 mana cost means nothing 

 Yea, but I do not think that is a great idea to run Oondasta only for Shirvallah, the Tiger.

Quote from Arivaali >>

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

theres a recently released neutral legendary that cheats out beasts from your hand, so the 25 mana cost means nothing 

 Yea, but I do not think that is a great idea to run Oondasta only for Shirvallah, the Tiger.

 eh i guess but 14 burst damage + heal for 7 and threaten the board is pretty decent

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

Quote from Arivaali >>

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

theres a recently released neutral legendary that cheats out beasts from your hand, so the 25 mana cost means nothing 

 Yea, but I do not think that is a great idea to run Oondasta only for Shirvallah, the Tiger.

 eh i guess but 14 burst damage + heal for 7 and threaten the board is pretty decent

Really good, I agree, but I am afraid to lose Oondasta and end with a dead card.

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

theres a recently released neutral legendary that cheats out beasts from your hand, so the 25 mana cost means nothing 

 Which is 9mana, must hit the target for overkill, and something like Shirvallah need to be in hand. Yeah, total cheat. Where are all of you sick teorists coming from? Strong cards - bad couse ruin meta, balanced cards - bad couse can be countered. The reason of my saltyness is your illogical endless whining.

Quote from TimonRaven >>

Quote from Kissmealloveragain >>

theres a recently released neutral legendary that cheats out beasts from your hand, so the 25 mana cost means nothing 

 Which is 9mana, must hit the target for overkill, and something like Shirvallah need to be in hand. Yeah, total cheat. Where are all of you sick teorists coming from? Strong cards - bad couse ruin meta, balanced cards - bad couse can be countered. The reason of my saltyness is your illogical endless whining.

 whining? yikes, i wasn't complaining i was simply explaining a possibility. good effect cards generally have bad stats, to stop them from being too powerful. you need to take a look at your own incredibly flawed logic before judging other people