So I have been playing in Wild lately in last 2 seasons & I have been playing highlander Priest of various forms. These decks at their current state barely have positive win rates & lastly I noticed that the 0 mana hero power would barely make any difference in late game.
So Blizzard can think about unnerfing Raza. It''ll give priest a strong but not broken archetype to play with in wild or otherwise your only resort is big priest which is fucking garbage against aggro or mill decks.
Also ironically Big priest has 90% win rates against my highlander decks (Deathrattle variant, reactive inspire variant, dragon variant any variant of highlander priest)
I don't know if you played wild while unerfed Raza was there in Kobolds but I did and the deck was ridiculous. You are severely underestimating how much better a repeatable hero power is when it is 0 mana. It is a LOT easier to OTK while also making it easier to control the board if you do not have the OTK. Even the 0 mana heal is great against aggro for those times when every point mana and health matters.
The fact that the deck is still tier 2 after such a a HUGE nerf makes it very apparent that it would be tier 0 if the nerf was reverted.
I don't agree that Raza should be changed to the previous form. but I think they should have made the battlecry to reduce the cost of hp for rest of the game by 1. this way you can combo it with Zola / brann to get 0 mana hp. and if you complaining about dying from a priest with 50 hp i just want to remind you that there is mechathun priest that if he gets hemet can win turn 10 regardless of anything you do. and if you check the deck spotlights you will see that there is 80 dmg galery priest so clearly priest can do 80 dmg even without raza so adding it makes no difference
So I have been playing in Wild lately in last 2 seasons & I have been playing highlander Priest of various forms. These decks at their current state barely have positive win rates & lastly I noticed that the 0 mana hero power would barely make any difference in late game.
So Blizzard can think about unnerfing Raza. It''ll give priest a strong but not broken archetype to play with in wild or otherwise your only resort is big priest which is fucking garbage against aggro or mill decks.
I guess you wouldn't mind trading unnerfed Raza for unnerfed 5 mana Naga Sea witch?
So I have been playing in Wild lately in last 2 seasons & I have been playing highlander Priest of various forms. These decks at their current state barely have positive win rates & lastly I noticed that the 0 mana hero power would barely make any difference in late game.
So Blizzard can think about unnerfing Raza. It''ll give priest a strong but not broken archetype to play with in wild or otherwise your only resort is big priest which is fucking garbage against aggro or mill decks.
Trust me it would barely make any difference.
Also ironically Big priest has 90% win rates against my highlander decks (Deathrattle variant, reactive inspire variant, dragon variant any variant of highlander priest)
no
Keep dreaming
Please no. We already had enough 2 dmg machine gun priests during KOFT.
I think the same. But then I would rather have seen a nerf on the deathknight.
No.
Nope
Nein
Nope.
Niet
I would rather not randomly die from 50hp, soooooo... Nope.
P.S. Also Highlander Priest is one of the best control decks in Wild, try to git gud, that might help.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Just no.
--Alfi--
Maybe one of the worst ideas related to re-balancing a card. OP's username checks out.
That'll do, Huffer. That'll do.
I don't know if you played wild while unerfed Raza was there in Kobolds but I did and the deck was ridiculous. You are severely underestimating how much better a repeatable hero power is when it is 0 mana. It is a LOT easier to OTK while also making it easier to control the board if you do not have the OTK. Even the 0 mana heal is great against aggro for those times when every point mana and health matters.
The fact that the deck is still tier 2 after such a a HUGE nerf makes it very apparent that it would be tier 0 if the nerf was reverted.
I hope you are a troll...
Dead but dreaming
I don't agree that Raza should be changed to the previous form. but I think they should have made the battlecry to reduce the cost of hp for rest of the game by 1. this way you can combo it with Zola / brann to get 0 mana hp. and if you complaining about dying from a priest with 50 hp i just want to remind you that there is mechathun priest that if he gets hemet can win turn 10 regardless of anything you do. and if you check the deck spotlights you will see that there is 80 dmg galery priest so clearly priest can do 80 dmg even without raza so adding it makes no difference
Net
I'd rather have new, interesting cards.
Playing Hearthstone in German solely for Garrosh sounds. Sieg oder Tod!
I guess you wouldn't mind trading unnerfed Raza for unnerfed 5 mana Naga Sea witch?