Having more than 10 attack would be insane op, having 8 attack it can kill everything in the game except deathwing soo I think 8 attack is good :D , magma rager killing malganis like a boss
What I find far more interesting is that of the options available, nobody picked 9. Even with a reasonable amount picking a number - a roughly 50/50 split - 9 hasn't been picked. So whatever the answer is, it isn't 9, at least.
6 Might be fair, but more may be needed in order for it to be useful in other ways . . .
I like to make cards and discuss game balance.
I enjoy when "No similar decks were found."
My latest deck: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1366184-scholomance-charge-rez-priest-wild
Indeed, So there must be some middle Ground there.
I like to make cards and discuss game balance.
I enjoy when "No similar decks were found."
My latest deck: http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1366184-scholomance-charge-rez-priest-wild
This thread is futile. :D
Having more than 10 attack would be insane op, having 8 attack it can kill everything in the game except deathwing soo I think 8 attack is good :D , magma rager killing malganis like a boss
There isn't a number that puts it in the "viable" category that doesn't also put it in the "overpowered" category.
Make the Card: The biggest thread on the site!
My mandibles which are capable of pressing down and tearing, my talons which are known to intercept and hold.
What I find far more interesting is that of the options available, nobody picked 9. Even with a reasonable amount picking a number - a roughly 50/50 split - 9 hasn't been picked. So whatever the answer is, it isn't 9, at least.
You can find me here! Good luck everyone!
A 10/1 would definitely be played with Charge in warrior decks. I think a 9/1 or 8/1 would too.
Yeah don't forget about the charge spell. I think 10 attack would be fair. Really what it should be is an inverse of Ice Rager. 2/5.
It would be bad even with 10dmg, but 10 would be my answer.