Fuck it, another board clear. And as it is an elemental, shamans will get it too. I did not know what they will create to make me hate this game more, I've got the answer.
Everyone saying this is worse than Duskbreaker is kinda wrong. It’s not that hard to play elemental for mage and Frost lich Jaina decks already run baron geddon. This is baron geddon for one less mana and does more damage to lifesteal even higher amounts for the drawback of a little worse body, but as Jaina, the 7/5 body doesn’t matter that much. At 4 mana this would be completely broken, which is why it has a higher mana cost than a priest card.
Not only it costs 2 mroe than Duskbreaker, but it actually requires you to have cast an elemental the previous turn. That would sometimes put you in a situation where all of sudden you would need its battlecry, but you've not planned for it. But what it's worse, it's that when you have actually cast an elemental the previous turn, it is going to be blasted by this new Duskbreaker as well.. still, Duskbreaker is a broken card! This seems still playable anyway (and pretty nice if you have Frost Jaina out)
Well... I have been trying to make a minion Mage deck something workable for a time, but have lacked some AoE... This certainly isn't a good card, but perhaps in that niche, it will have a place. I'll vote as Playable and see what will happen.
Well Baron Geddon is far better (and this is why is Legendary) as it has a continuous effect each round that also damages the opponent, does not demand a condition met and has far better stats. As i said in an edited previous post of mine, we are talking for such a card in a class that has Blizzard, Flamestrike or Dragon's Fury. For 6, 7 and 5 mana accordingly. Is there any reason to exclude any of those cards and replace them for Arcanosaur? I find it unlikely, although we will see it making some appearances from time to time, especialy in budget decks.
Well Baron Geddon is far better (and this is why is Legendary) as it has a continuous effect each round that also damages the opponent, does not demand a condition met and has far better stats. As i said in an edited previous post of mine, we are talking for such a card in a class that has Blizzard, Flamestrike or Dragon's Fury. For 6, 7 and 5 mana accordingly. Is there any reason to exclude any of those cards and replace them for Arcanosaur? I find it unlikely, although we will see it making some appearances from time to time, especialy in budget decks.
Yeah. Using a similar card to estimate this card's powerlevel is a horrible idea. Your contribution to this thread is fantastic, however.
Fuck it, another board clear. And as it is an elemental, shamans will get it too. I did not know what they will create to make me hate this game more, I've got the answer.
Everyone saying this is worse than Duskbreaker is kinda wrong. It’s not that hard to play elemental for mage and Frost lich Jaina decks already run baron geddon. This is baron geddon for one less mana and does more damage to lifesteal even higher amounts for the drawback of a little worse body, but as Jaina, the 7/5 body doesn’t matter that much. At 4 mana this would be completely broken, which is why it has a higher mana cost than a priest card.
Why is it 6 mana? -.-
Cause it's a T-Rex, duh ...
Why is the rum gone?
Not only it costs 2 mroe than Duskbreaker, but it actually requires you to have cast an elemental the previous turn. That would sometimes put you in a situation where all of sudden you would need its battlecry, but you've not planned for it. But what it's worse, it's that when you have actually cast an elemental the previous turn, it is going to be blasted by this new Duskbreaker as well.. still, Duskbreaker is a broken card! This seems still playable anyway (and pretty nice if you have Frost Jaina out)
My Wild Cutlass Thief, a rogue deck focused on Spectral Cutlass. Just reached #176 Legend with a 62% win rate from rank 5.
Priest has this card for 4 mana and an easier condition. Poor Mage...
Its sad that the Mage version of this card has to play a minion into their AoE.
Well... I have been trying to make a minion Mage deck something workable for a time, but have lacked some AoE... This certainly isn't a good card, but perhaps in that niche, it will have a place. I'll vote as Playable and see what will happen.
Well Baron Geddon is far better (and this is why is Legendary) as it has a continuous effect each round that also damages the opponent, does not demand a condition met and has far better stats. As i said in an edited previous post of mine, we are talking for such a card in a class that has Blizzard, Flamestrike or Dragon's Fury. For 6, 7 and 5 mana accordingly. Is there any reason to exclude any of those cards and replace them for Arcanosaur? I find it unlikely, although we will see it making some appearances from time to time, especialy in budget decks.
Believe in potential; the multiverse blesses some beings with extraordinary traits, with the potential to do—to be—great things.
A reverse-powercreeped Duskbreaker that turns into an INCREDIBLE healing tool if you have played Frost Lich Jaina. Also, this gives mage yet another way to screw with Emerald Spellstone on curve if they don't want to Dragon's Fury, leave a lot of frozen 3/1 wolves using Blizzard, or Coin + Flamestrike.
You know that priests do not have anyhting else except Duskbreaker and also this little dragon does not become a copy of Reno if played after DK card?
Board clears for minion heavy elemental decks. Baron seems enough
i love the art
but six mana, i think that its to expensive
Creer es poder
Good card for decks that run book of spectres and are light on AOE.
Weaker Duskbreaker is still very strong.
Obviously meant for Book of Specter, maybe some even Mage decks that can’t run Dragon’s Fury / Flamestrike. Not bad in that context.
So when Jaina DK rotates in just 1 expansion, this instantly becomes bad.
budget duskbreaker.. Duskbreaker is a rare..
also another one said duskbreaker on steroids.. people just put random nouns about any card huh I don't even...
Book of Specters
Also this guy:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCItISwABVRjboRSBBi6WYTA
You mean on crack.