• 3

    posted a message on A defense for Paladin

    [Favorite Class: Paladin]

    -____-

     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on How many people who hate Secret Paladin have played it?

    It's called "cancer" because it's all over the fucking ladder and boasts superior win rates to boot.

    Whether it's broken or not is debatable, of course. That doesn't change the fact that is definitely IS a strong deck and you WILL play against it more than anything else.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on A defence of Secret Paladin
    Quote from batanete >>
    Quote from iShinobi >>
    Ostkaka got rank 1 legend with SP not long ago, and guess what? His list had no DF and ran a lot of unusual cards like ragnaros(if you don't believe me, look it up). DF is certainly a decent card in the deck, but it's by no means an auto include, and nerfing it would certainly not be enough to make the deck OK.
    But then again judging by a lot of the bullshit in your post, you likely play at the lower rankings where most people use the aggressive variant of SP(which has long since been proven to be strictly worse) and that's probably why most people are using DF against you as that is INDEED a common card on that version.

    Oh I believe you. Indeed I'm low ranked atm, rank 15 to be exact, I'll get legend later. My post is bullshit because I'm not referring to Ostkaka? lol. Please get off your edgy high horse. Yes most of the S. Pallies I see running around down here are using it, putting "indeed" in caps certainly gave me a new found understanding of the meta game, thanks friend, for proving my point.

    Judging on the policies by which Blizzard have nerfed cards before, I'd say Divine Favor falls right inline. If you think Dr. 6 is the real problem like many others, you're entitled to your opinion.

    Thing it's NOT an opinion, it's fact. Literally no one at legend ranks uses DF as anything but a one off(and most people don't even use it at all anymore, and mostly treat it as a tech choice against slower metas). Furthermore nobody made a big deal of the card before TGT. I guess you think this means DF has been a broken card since beta of hearthstone right?
    If the competitive players who use the deck to climb to rank one do not use the card in their deck lists, how can you say that the deck will not be broken if you nerf DF?It's common sense, not a matter of opinion.
    Oh by the way, congratulations on being rank 15 on the 5th of the season. I'm currently rank 7 and I'm playing against people who were legend before the reset(you know, like I was too). Want to know how many SP's I saw using DF since I started climbing? One. And yes, I do face SP in over 30% of my games. So excuse me but I'll stick to saying that your  completely unfounded opinion on the the card is irrelevant.
    Look it up, there were threads about it long before TGT was released, so no it's not a problem all of a sudden. The cancer that is/was aggro Paladin is proof enough, not just S. Pally. I don't know how the card being a 'one of' isn't saying that it's STILL used in legend rank, tech choice or whatever you add to justify your silly point, it's being used is it not? What is everyone netdecking off this site right now then? Honestly, your desperation to disprove the obvious is just sad. 

    I'll assume my 'unfounded' opinion was formed the same as yours, by experience. In your experience you only saw it once. Once was enough for me to know it's stupidly designed. Though I must say I'm not nearly as invested in you are in this game or even this website, so you must certainly know it all.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on A defence of Secret Paladin
    Ostkaka got rank 1 legend with SP not long ago, and guess what? His list had no DF and ran a lot of unusual cards like ragnaros(if you don't believe me, look it up). DF is certainly a decent card in the deck, but it's by no means an auto include, and nerfing it would certainly not be enough to make the deck OK.
    But then again judging by a lot of the bullshit in your post, you likely play at the lower rankings where most people use the aggressive variant of SP(which has long since been proven to be strictly worse) and that's probably why most people are using DF against you as that is INDEED a common card on that version.

    Oh I believe you. Indeed I'm low ranked atm, rank 15 to be exact, I'll get legend later. My post is bullshit because I'm not referring to Ostkaka? lol. Please get off your edgy high horse. Yes most of the S. Pallies I see running around down here are using it, putting "indeed" in caps certainly gave me a new found understanding of the meta game, thanks friend, for proving my point.

    Judging on the policies by which Blizzard have nerfed cards before, I'd say Divine Favor falls right inline. If you think Dr. 6 is the real problem like many others, you're entitled to your opinion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Is Divine Favor broken? nerf?
    Quote from killyridols >>

    Well a noob is a new player right? So 500 ranked wins would not be a new player. And if I was facing a greedy ass control warrior and I had Divine Favor in my hand I would also play Muster on turn three and four, why? To draw more cards with Divine Favor that's why. If he had dumped his hand to rush you down to 5 and not had Divine Favor and you dropped Reno on turn six, you would have won, and I'm sure you would have called it "skill". I have a good idea for you, STFU, queue up, and move on. And you had Loatheb in your fucking hand on turn 5 and didn't play it. What were waiting for? Avenging Wrath stopper on turn 8? I think you just might be the noob. noob. 

     That moment you realize he played Harrison Jones and got rekt.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on A defence of Secret Paladin
    Quote from batanete >>
    Quote from iShinobi >>
    Quote from Oneoflethal >>

    Imo the problem is Divine Favor

     This guy gets it.

    "Mysterious Challenger is balanced because it makes you put shitty 1 mana secrets in your deck."

    Remember when people used to say this? Now while I wouldn't use the word balanced, the statement still holds some water. While the card is strong, in most situations, playing around secrets are not that difficult.
    Gaining an advantage for your opponent being ahead on card advantage almost the same as pre-nerf Starving Buzzard getting an advantage for being ahead on board in tandem with Unleash the Hounds.

    You'd be like "ok, his card is empty! He's exhausted his resources like any shitty face deck would. Time to win!"
    He just vomits his hard, plays that and says "lol nope."

    I feel like it's legit the Warsong Commander of Secret Paladin or any aggro variant of Paladin.


     I agree, because every single SP list is running DF... Oh wait...
    Witty sarcasm? Oh you smaht, you very smaht.

    I'm pretty sure the strongest, most consistent variant is running it. 

    I have no other qualms about the deck because Control Priest beats it so bad it's not funny.

    Take away Divine Favor and they will NEED to draw perfectly to stand a chance.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on A defence of Secret Paladin
    Quote from Oneoflethal >>

    Imo the problem is Divine Favor

     This guy gets it.

    "Mysterious Challenger is balanced because it makes you put shitty 1 mana secrets in your deck."

    Remember when people used to say this? Now while I wouldn't use the word balanced, the statement still holds some water. While the card is strong, in most situations, playing around secrets are not that difficult.
    Gaining an advantage for your opponent being ahead on card advantage almost the same as pre-nerf Starving Buzzard getting an advantage for being ahead on board in tandem with Unleash the Hounds.

    You'd be like "ok, his card is empty! He's exhausted his resources like any shitty face deck would. Time to win!"
    He just vomits his hard, plays that and says "lol nope."

    I feel like it's legit the Warsong Commander of Secret Paladin or any aggro variant of Paladin.


    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Which legendary would you craft?

    Dust wise, neutral cards are always the most valuable since you can get so much play out of them.

    If we were talking about Warrior, I'd have voted Baron Geddon.

    I like Chillmaw but I used to run Dragon Priest without it and did okay.

    Vol'jin is great too but of course is class specific and Priests already have many control options.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is card pack RNG rigged?
    Quote from causese1990 >>

    http://hearthstone.gamepedia.com/Card_pack_statistics

    i got 6x legendary from 50 classic pack promotion thingy (if you count golden raggy as 4x legendaries)

    i don't think not rigged since cards have a chance to become a higher rarity

    there were plenty dudes who got 5 legendaries from 1 pack

     Show me one instance that's not fake.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why do people hate Secret Paladin so much?
    Quote from HomerRupaul >>
    Quote from Sisuwolf >>
    Play a control deck?
    Free wins against Secret Paladin.

    Now, that is an exaggeration if I've ever seen one

    Not if the S.Paladin player is a complete scrub and does things like kill your Zombie Chow while Auchenai Soulpriest is on the board.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 60-65% of all my games are against Paladin
    Quote from firekindle >>

    Op probably lost two games against secret paladin in a row with some inferior "interesting" shit deck he made and now comes here to cry. Like everyone else making threads like this over and over and over again.

     Even if that were the case, that doesn't discount the fact that  their overall winrate is absurd.

    Personally sick of seeing them in arena, their common cards are stupid strong.

    No point complaining about it though as Blizzard balances the game with "more cards."
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Who beat Secret eboladin

    I beat one with Totem Shaman but I suspect he recently netdecked it. Playing around all their shit makes me feel smart but it's actually not very difficult. I teched a Kezan Mystic and Earth Shock really wrecks them.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Why all the Face Hunter hate?

    To me it's the benchmark other decks are measured against because it used to be so widespread (read: cancerous).

    If your deck can't beat it, you might as well not ladder at all. Teching for control is one thing but losing to aggro just 'feelsbadman.'

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on dragon priest is ruining the game

    G8 B8 M8 I R8 8/8

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Priest Legendary - Confessor Paletress

    It's funny that one of the cards you really don't want to see pop up is the card itself.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.