Hearthpwn

OP has no idea what he's talking about.

First of all cat is strongest.

Second its an easy brawl.

There's nothing wrong with netdecking. I don't understand why anyone would do that instead of building their own deck, but to each their own.

Quote from ZebZero >>

I'm playing wild this expention and one of flavors wild has that standard doesn't is inspire. 

I don't know why it was abandoned since TGT, but these are fun cards to play with and maybe Blizzard should revisit this ability and make some new inspire minions.   

Why would I care about golden heroes in the first place?

Create a good off-meta deck, spend a dozen of hours testing it, then write up a decent article/video about it and send it to Hearthpwn?

Thanks juacma :)

But what's the point of Blizzcon then? I mean Hearthstone-wise.

I don't understand, isn't the world championship supposed to happen at Blizzcon?

He's in an unfavoured matchup as Orange's list is teched agains shamans (Giants). He needs better mulligan than that.

Hearsay. Show proof.

Quote from Initetan >>

Is there any significant benefit going for legend once you achieve rank 5? 

The difference in potential dust gain is about 35? The time spent to legend is a lot more. 

 

So I'm sure most of that stuff is in your mind.

I have been playing for three years on three different servers and I have experienced intentional roping from  my opponents once. A single time.

I tried N'Zoth versions but I just found them too inconsistent. Also N'Zoth was very much of a win more card. In the matchups where I could get away with playing it, I was fine already. So I just added good cards instead.

I think that the Curator package is a must as card draw is needed. Finley is the only murloc I could fit in and it's a good early game card. I keep questioning its place as it is unplayable after Rexxar, but I find that it's just too good in a lot of cases.

Alex is absolutely brilliant and fishing it out with the Curator is so good and so crucial that I keep talking myself out of adding Azure Drake. I'm probably wrong there and the card should be added.

A second beast would be nice for Curator.

I'm happy with all the weapons.

The deck may be too top heavy still. Adding more early game, deathrattles and N'Zoth could work if you find a way.

This is my current version of Reno Hunter. I'm sure it can be optimized but I'm doing fine with it for now.

### Reno
# Class: Hunter
# Format: Wild
#
# 1x (1) Hunter's Mark
# 1x (1) Mistress of Mixtures
# 1x (1) Sir Finley Mrrgglton
# 1x (1) Tracking
# 1x (2) Bloodmage Thalnos
# 1x (2) Flare
# 1x (2) Grievous Bite
# 1x (2) Quick Shot
# 1x (3) Animal Companion
# 1x (3) Brann Bronzebeard
# 1x (3) Deadly Shot
# 1x (3) Dreadscale
# 1x (3) Eaglehorn Bow
# 1x (3) Kill Command
# 1x (3) Powershot
# 1x (3) Stitched Tracker
# 1x (3) Unleash the Hounds
# 1x (4) Cult Master
# 1x (4) Refreshment Vendor
# 1x (5) Antique Healbot
# 1x (5) Elise the Trailblazer
# 1x (5) Explosive Shot
# 1x (5) Piranha Launcher
# 1x (6) Deathstalker Rexxar
# 1x (6) Emperor Thaurissan
# 1x (6) Reno Jackson
# 1x (7) Gladiator's Longbow
# 1x (7) The Curator
# 1x (8) Ragnaros the Firelord
# 1x (9) Alexstrasza
#
AAEBAR8ejQGoArcC9gKKA7UDxQTtBasGgAeXCMUI2wn+DPUP1BHWEcoUzhSQFcMWhBeFF7myAuu9AobDAt7EAs/HAtPNAobTAgAA
#
# To use this deck, copy it to your clipboard and create a new deck in Hearthstone

So anyone has a correct list of the two sets of choices BTW? I didn't find one anywhere.