y i like baron so much thats why i think second brawl is not needed 1 brawl 1 baron 1 revenge and deaths bite deathrattles are enough for me i beat zoos constantly
i run workout974 warrior list, only difference is loatheb instead of harrison, and i want to make that final push to legend and i want to try your deck but i find that 1 brawl is enough atleast from my perspective, i like double bgh because i face so many handlocks, im only scared that i will get them early vs zoo and other fast aggro decks, well i would put 1 bgh instead of loatheb i think, but i like your other choices
We will be performing scheduled maintenance beginning on Tuesday, May 12, at 03:00 AM PDT and we expect the service to be available again at approximately 11:00 AM PDT. During this time you will be able to use Battle.net is offline mode only.
lol this balthier guy 1 week before this he said " grim patron is not OP and certainly a warrior deck based on the grim patroncombo is not OP either. i confirmed this after playing against many people with this deck and i won like 70% with a garbage mech paladin midrange-tempo deck. i believe the best way to play grim patron is still in the old cw as an extra way to win. decks which rely only on the combo to win are gimmick-fun only. he is a card that requires another card(s) to work thats why it will never be reliable enough. if you drop him alone on turn 5 he does nothing on each own and your opponent will already have a board. by turn 9 that you say the combo activates and you lose or whatever....i will say that against aggro and midrange decks by turn 9 you already have lost or won. today i played against 3 warriors who played grim patron combo-only deck and won all of them and i played a single warrior who was a cw but he had grim patrons and commander only and i lost. not by the grim patron comboi lost from his other cw plays. that said he is not OP, people will try thesecombo only variances and eventually abandon them cause they are not reliable for ranked."
0
y i like baron so much thats why i think second brawl is not needed 1 brawl 1 baron 1 revenge and deaths bite deathrattles are enough for me i beat zoos constantly
0
i run workout974 warrior list, only difference is loatheb instead of harrison, and i want to make that final push to legend and i want to try your deck but i find that 1 brawl is enough atleast from my perspective, i like double bgh because i face so many handlocks, im only scared that i will get them early vs zoo and other fast aggro decks, well i would put 1 bgh instead of loatheb i think, but i like your other choices
2
wow nice deck man, but what do u think is worth running more double bgh or 2 brawls? because i want to play either 2 bgh or 2 brawls rank 5 eu atm
0
tinkmaster overspark :D
0
haha yea, are u on eu aswell?
0
omg im cursed :(
0
but my friend is in eu aswell and he's playing the game...
0
We will be performing scheduled maintenance beginning on Tuesday, May 12, at 03:00 AM PDT and we expect the service to be available again at approximately 11:00 AM PDT. During this time you will be able to use Battle.net is offline mode only.
anyone with same problem?
0
well as soon as they announced the card i was saying that its good
-17
fuck off idiot
0
control warr is good, look at fibonacci he was rank 1 legend on na for the past 2 seasons that means A LOOOT
0
haha so much PJSalt at one place da fuk
1
that golden animation
0
lol this balthier guy 1 week before this he said " grim patron is not OP and certainly a warrior deck based on the grim patroncombo is not OP either. i confirmed this after playing against many people with this deck and i won like 70% with a garbage mech paladin midrange-tempo deck. i believe the best way to play grim patron is still in the old cw as an extra way to win. decks which rely only on the combo to win are gimmick-fun only. he is a card that requires another card(s) to work thats why it will never be reliable enough. if you drop him alone on turn 5 he does nothing on each own and your opponent will already have a board. by turn 9 that you say the combo activates and you lose or whatever....i will say that against aggro and midrange decks by turn 9 you already have lost or won. today i played against 3 warriors who played grim patron combo-only deck and won all of them and i played a single warrior who was a cw but he had grim patrons and commander only and i lost. not by the grim patron comboi lost from his other cw plays. that said he is not OP, people will try thesecombo only variances and eventually abandon them cause they are not reliable for ranked."
and now its sooo good lol so funny
2
wow nice deck man beautiful, nice to see that shaman still works