Don't you think it's possible that the best decks for shaman and warrior are yet to be found. Usually it takes a while for someone to find a viable deck for the worst classes, but it almost always happens after the meta has settled.
I mean as long as they print another counter in the next set, I'm ok. It's always good to have a counter to secrets, especially if tempo mage gets a buff.
Yeah, hearthstone is not random, the devs use something called 'weighted RNG' to get the results they want. They say this is for 'fun' but really it is to influence you to spend money.
Quote from KingSevault>> Zero evidence for that, zero logical support for that.
nicely done, its a shame blizzard doesn't do anything about toxic behavior like this. It is also sadly why we cant even have an optional chat function in a card game.
I agree with this. I feel like not having a chat ironically makes the game more toxic.
You do know why stonehill defender is played in paladin, right? It's because you have a chance at getting Tirion. Now take the word chance and change it to always. That's what the card your calling bad does.
Also this whole "nothing I could get can be played on curve." bs that you're spouting makes any sense. That's what we call a control deck. Control decks don't need to play on curve.
2
Tournament mode died for this
0
The release date is the middle of the year. I don't know where you're getting this "two months after the next expansion" from.
0
2 months after the expansion's release would not be "the middle of the year".
1
Iron juggernaut <3
0
Don't you think it's possible that the best decks for shaman and warrior are yet to be found. Usually it takes a while for someone to find a viable deck for the worst classes, but it almost always happens after the meta has settled.
0
I mean as long as they print another counter in the next set, I'm ok. It's always good to have a counter to secrets, especially if tempo mage gets a buff.
0
There are 34 standard hunter spells, half of them being trash. How do they expect us to even make a deck????
0
That's assuming it doesn't get oozed before your next turn. Not only does this card have no immediate effect, it could very possibly have no effect.
2
"unreliable" you're kidding right?
0
Zero evidence is a bit of a stretch. - http://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/205267-the-impact-of-activision-on-the-future-of
1
Just make sure to get Bonemare and Cobalt Scalebane from knights of the frozen throne. After that you can make almost anything a solid deck.
1
I would love to see this as a brawl. I don't even care if it's broken.
0
0
Still trying to base the value of new cards on whether or not they fit into currently existing decks.
0
You do know why stonehill defender is played in paladin, right? It's because you have a chance at getting Tirion. Now take the word chance and change it to always. That's what the card your calling bad does.
Also this whole "nothing I could get can be played on curve." bs that you're spouting makes any sense. That's what we call a control deck. Control decks don't need to play on curve.