Obviously BGH would go from top tier to garbage tier, and Hemet would go from garbage tier to arguably must-craft, but would it be an effective nerf to the BGH effect while still keeping it in the game? Would it be an overall nerf or an overall buff to control decks, since they lose an extremely efficient and effective removal, but they also could run more 7+ power cards since each deck can only run one BGH effect and it's much less tempo efficient at 5 mana than it is at 3 mana. Would the "Big Three" neutral legendaries of Boom, Rag, and Sylvanas become the "Big Four", and where would the new Hemet Nessingwary fit into that crafting priority (assuming that the usual crafting priority there is Boom > Sylvanas > Ragnaros)?
That would be bad news! since brm, bgh isnt "that" necessary, but still a must for a lot of decks you dont see it on zoo, face, tempo mage, shockadin, oil rogue and its useless against these decks i not sure it would become a "Big four"
I agree. It's a tech card, giving it legendary status or even increasing it's mana cost would make it competitive with TBK and Harrison. Besides, you could use only one in your deck, and using too many higher cost tech cards could actually lose you the game.
It would drastically weaken decks without hard removal. So priest, shaman, mage, warlock, and warrior get better. Druid, rogue, and paladin get worse. Hunter stays hunter.
Obviously BGH would go from top tier to garbage tier, and Hemet would go from garbage tier to arguably must-craft, but would it be an effective nerf to the BGH effect while still keeping it in the game? Would it be an overall nerf or an overall buff to control decks, since they lose an extremely efficient and effective removal, but they also could run more 7+ power cards since each deck can only run one BGH effect and it's much less tempo efficient at 5 mana than it is at 3 mana. Would the "Big Three" neutral legendaries of Boom, Rag, and Sylvanas become the "Big Four", and where would the new Hemet Nessingwary fit into that crafting priority (assuming that the usual crafting priority there is Boom > Sylvanas > Ragnaros)?
That would be bad news!
since brm, bgh isnt "that" necessary, but still a must for a lot of decks
you dont see it on zoo, face, tempo mage, shockadin, oil rogue and its useless against these decks
i not sure it would become a "Big four"
Blizz </3 Shaman
I agree. It's a tech card, giving it legendary status or even increasing it's mana cost would make it competitive with TBK and Harrison. Besides, you could use only one in your deck, and using too many higher cost tech cards could actually lose you the game.
It would drastically weaken decks without hard removal. So priest, shaman, mage, warlock, and warrior get better. Druid, rogue, and paladin get worse. Hunter stays hunter.