Hearthpwn

I'm using google chrome. I click on the "embed a video" icon, then it opens up a prompt. I copy the youtube URLs above and input it in and press submit. I get a prompt telling me that those websites don't work with the widget. I've tried removing everything before the youtube, I tried using the alternate youtube link as opposed to the youtu.be links, etc. same issue every time. 

I can always just paste the URL into my guide, but I feel like my viewing experience is smaller since I can't have the direct embed video into the guide. 
It did work last week for the first video I put up. I don't know what I changed within the few days that would prevent the other videos from going up. 

THESE LINKS don't work for me... IDK why. frustrating to not be able to get the actual video in my thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjOfrzmVFO4&feature=youtu.be

https://youtu.be/BCNrhq4jX5c

priest can be very powerful if you know what to expect out of your opponents. the problem is, in ranked, you can challenge so many archetypes on the spectrum --- aggro hunter, handlock, control warrior, druid etc. These all take different priest cards to do well and some of the priest cards that are good in some are horrible in others. Problem is priest is so reliant on said cards. 

This coming from a lvl 60 priest who hit rank 3 the past two seasons playing about an hour a day.

I have similar concerns

I just hit 60 with my priest yesterday, and am excited to get Warrior to 60. However, I played 3 games at level 31 and it seemed as if I was getting the same amount of experience as when I played similar games at 59 with my priest. Does your opponent conceding or you conceding affect how much experience is gained?

Do you get experience in custom games with friends?

im thinking cairne,rag, blackknight are unnecessary, and that u may need another mortal coil, sylvanas and ironbeak owl.

My thinking is that, against decks that run huge taunts, u can just silence them with ironbeak owl, or rely on a big shadowflame to clear board etc.

I also like sylvanas in these lists. mortal coil might not be necessary but i guess its pretty popular.

u have had more success withpriest??? im surprised because it doesnt have te draw power and the hero power seems to lack chemistry

at this point im down to try anything thoigh. gonna replace 1 swp with alextraza and give it a go

Quote from the9tail »

I've been having more luck playing HandPriest than HandWarlock lately.
It's not hard to switch!

what rank are u and can i see that list? im struggling wtih priest. hit 5 and dropped faaaar.

i feel your pain. hit 5 two days agi after going 13-2 since the patch then dropped all the way to 8. priest is frustrating. you cant afford to misplay

add me to but make sure u message me about being on the forum. I hit rank 3 last season playing 1 hour a day (which in priest games is like 2 games lol) for 2 weeks. SOLELY playing Priest. If i had a couple of grind sessions I'm fairly certain I would have hit legendary. kensanity#1609

With nerfs to tink master and pagle, i've made some changes to my list. I'm doing surprisingly well considering all the zoo warlocks out there. Many games i've been lucky but yeah. 

You can see my priest progress here at youtube.com/guamcards

i realize that this is a budget option, and i do like it. Things i do not like though, are 2 mind controls (1 seems better) and the singleton ancient watcher/protector. I think that is just much better as 2 senjin shield masta or possibly even harvest golem (since you already have defender of argus)

Obviously if you can break the budget, you would probably want cabal shadow priest but this deck is looking pretty solid.

amaz hit rank 9 in 8 hours with almost his exact list. there were 2 clerics and no velen or black knight though. i was surorised to see how well he did vs hunter and warrior aggro.

the deck is very reliant on combos. Against aggro u definitely want wild pyro and some combination of smite, CoH and injured blademaster.

What really is weird is that it runs so few taunt cards, and outside of the late game, the creatures really don't provide that much of an anti aggro plan.... I do'nt know how amaz did it but that guy made it work. 

The deck is pretty cool and I definitely want to get 2 golden thoughtseize because playing all gold cards that your opponent has is fun!

if there are a lot of hunters, find a way to fit room for 2 healing touch and 2 tazdingo. they are HUGE in the matchup

i feel like if u are facing a lot of hunters, u need to drop down on the high drops. i understand you want threats for other amtchups, but so many of those cards are dead vs hunter. i stand behind the belief that healing touch is one of the best cards againts hutners as well as the spell removal and senjin shieldmaster. 

I personally run harrison jones but at my rank all i challenge are hunters, rogues, paladins, warlocks and the mirror (granted itsucks there). weapon removal has play vs all that comp

Quote from Thudiniel »

I always played Warlock, even in the WoW TCG. I am going to check those out this night!

Question is about the Twilight Drakes, are they are so.. good?
I mean, meh.. You can get a better card in a cost 4 slot, and sometimes You just don't have a lot of cards in Your hand and when a 4 cost drop is killed by a 2 one is.. lame :p

Well with this deck, you should ALWAYs have a close to full hand. ITs all about life tapping turns 2 and 3, and then casting mountain giant/twilight drake on turn 4. Then its about putting up a taunt, free molten giant etc and trying to stabilize life totals. Then if u are still behind its about laying jaraxxus. This is how the matchup plays versus non aggressive decks.

Versus aggressive decks, I think you have to try to mulligan for watchers + removal and then hope u can lay out a nice taunt and stabilize accordingly. 

I was testing a similar build heavily last night. I found out that I did not want Mukla OR loremaster cho

instead i went spell heavy and used wild pyromancers to help clear the board. basically a standard druid list with the brewmasters, oracles and naturalize thrown in. It worked surprisingly well and I was able to kill a lot of people with a combination of damage and fatigue. 

Just want to clarify things about lroemaster and mukla i do not like.

I understand the magical christmas land of giving each other bananas back and forth preventing draws with loremaster cho out. However, this deck is really reactive and sometimes giving your opponent removal or stuff like swipe sucks, I quickly dropped Loremaster for more draw. 

Additionally, I don't like giving opponents the bananas for a 5/5, u rarely have board control and if a creature gets buffed its hard to come back. additioanlly, paying 2 mana late game in order to rid their hand of 2 cards isn't hard (the 2 bananas)