Hearthpwn

Are there going to be any class specifics in the expansions ?

I understood there are no neutral weapons, no neutral secrets and no neutral spells. but no news on the class specifics.

I hope there will be, and there were some leaks with cards that look like they are class legendaries but noone can be certain because they are not confirmed yet. 

This ones was leaked before blizzcone, so it`s confirms what they are not fake.

Info on these 'confirmed' legendaries?

source of confirmation?

official blizzard art from gvg site. just images. 

Quote from PM87 »

maybe I am missing something, but how does stating that there will be class legendaries confirm these are the actual cards?

don't get me wrong, im not saying they are fake, and would like them to be real even, because the effects are unique and fun.

Becouse they was leaked before Blizzcone and one of them(Iron Juggernaut) marked as "Mech".

Quote from TrioMax »

This ones was leaked before blizzcone, so it`s confirms what they are not fake.

I assume the cards are real, their abilities are not. All GvG cards have a GvG Water mark symbol on them, you'll see clear o nthe Spider Tank:



Thos legendaries have not, but the images themselves are IMO the real deal. Would be suprised if we would not see Gallywix in this expansion.

Quote from AIperon »

Quote from TrioMax »

This ones was leaked before blizzcone, so it`s confirms what they are not fake.

I assume the cards are real, their abilities are not. All GvG cards have a GvG Water mark symbol on them, you'll see clear o nthe Spider Tank:



Thos legendaries have not, but the images themselves are IMO the real deal. Would be suprised if we would not see Gallywix in this expansion.

Preview cards of Naxxramas doesn't have a watermarks too.

Quote from TrioMax »

Quote from AIperon »

Quote from TrioMax »

This ones was leaked before blizzcone, so it`s confirms what they are not fake.

I assume the cards are real, their abilities are not. All GvG cards have a GvG Water mark symbol on them, you'll see clear o nthe Spider Tank:



Thos legendaries have not, but the images themselves are IMO the real deal. Would be suprised if we would not see Gallywix in this expansion.

Preview cards of Naxxramas doesn't have a watermarks too.

Tehir abilities did change as well. Loatheb had the Nerubian Warlord ability written so far i remember correctly.

Quote from Domtux »

Wow! Those class legendaries are pretty cool. No way the warrior one is real though, 6 mana 6/6 with pyroblast? Doubt it

Yeah, not only the pyro effect, it also denies the opponent a draw (because you draw the mine) - this can't be discounted, particularly if you are in topdecking mode.  And it fits perfectly in a control warrior deck which aims to last long. 

Woohoo ! class legendary coming up - so there will be at least one :)

There's no way that the Leviathon card is the mage legendary.  Echo of Medivh is the name of a character in the chess event in Karazhan, so he has to be a Legendary.  And mage is the only that makes sense.

In fact, here's a link which might hint at what the card might do:

http://www.wowwiki.com/Chess_event#Warning:_Medivh_Cheats.21

Quote from myrec »

Quote from Devor »

There's no way that the Leviathon card is the mage legendary.  Echo of Medivh is the name of a character in the chess event in Karazhan, so he has to be a Legendary.  And mage is the only that makes sense.

In fact, here's a link which might hint at what the card might do:

http://www.wowwiki.com/Chess_event#Warning:_Medivh_Cheats.21

I think that will not be the case. Reason: There are 4 class legendary in leaked voting. So 5th one would have not legendary as opposite in vote. That's unlikely.

Taking a look at the wiki, it looks like Crush is a Yeti boss with enrage that you meet in a gladiator's match at the Brawler's Guild.

http://wowpedia.org/Crush_(Brawler%27s_Guild)

Sounds like it might be a Warrior Legendary to me.

I think they'll reveal the shaman class legendary after voting, because they haven't shown one for shaman yet outside of voting, and it isn't in the voting nor  the leak.

They obviously altered the voting system due to the 4 leaked legendaries to have class legendaries that weren't leaked.

On the picture of the Crush card is some Pit Lord, not a Yeti.

Quote from myrec »

Quote from Devor »

Quote from myrec »

Quote from Devor »

There's no way that the Leviathon card is the mage legendary.  Echo of Medivh is the name of a character in the chess event in Karazhan, so he has to be a Legendary.  And mage is the only that makes sense.

In fact, here's a link which might hint at what the card might do:

http://www.wowwiki.com/Chess_event#Warning:_Medivh_Cheats.21

I think that will not be the case. Reason: There are 4 class legendary in leaked voting. So 5th one would have not legendary as opposite in vote. That's unlikely.

Taking a look at the wiki, it looks like Crush is a Yeti boss with enrage that you meet in a gladiator's match at the Brawler's Guild.

http://wowpedia.org/Crush_(Brawler%27s_Guild)

Sounds like it might be a Warrior Legendary to me.

You forget little detail. That Crush and this crush look totally different. That fire on head and so on.

I think Crush will be something like Destroy random minion, owner of that minion draw a card. For 2 mana.

That's true.  I couldn't find the leaked art when I posted.  Echo of Medivh looks different from the Karazhan fight as well, which doesn't make sense to me.  So you might be right.  I'm not sure.

Still, it doesn't seem likely that they would give some classes legendaries as epic as Bolvar, Malganiss and Malorne, but then give mage and warrior mechs when both classes have so many incredible choices to choose from.  And as others have said, the mechanics on some of those leaked cards are pretty broken.  They might have been real when they were leaked, but I'd be surprised if more than one or two of them make it into the game.

I know who Vol'jin and Gallywix are.  I didn't know who Iron Juggernaut or Flame Leviathon were.  But Echo of Medivh is also a raid boss, kind of.

There are more pieces of leaked voting art than are needed for the slots announced for the voting, so Echo of Medivh might be a class legendary without needing another legendary to be voted against.

Everything on alpha is subject to a lot of change.  That's the point of alpha.  Some of the leaked cards could have been experimental, or even place holders, or at least early drafts of the final.  There's no reason to think they should appear as leaked, even if they are "real."

Gallywix gives players "a Coin". We don't know what that is yet. You're all thinking of "The Coin"... That's assuming these card texts are even legitimate, which I doubt.

Edit: I must admit this is unlikely - I doubt Blizzard would, through all their endeavors to keep the game "simple on the surface", make two cards so similar in name. And given that, in this case, in order for Gallywix's text not to be broken, [card]The Coin[/edit] would have to be changed to no longer be a spell (into... What, exactly?), which would break the game's overall cohesion, this only leaves my belief that these cards' texts are BS.

Quote from myrec »

That could be great card. 0 cost 0/8. No taunt no nothing, just mech.

I see you are an Inner Fire player...