Learn more about Whispers of the Old Gods
Want to learn more about Whispers of the Old Gods ? Head on over to our Whispers of the Old Gods guide!
Discuss this Card on the Forums
Join the discussion on our forums! Come discuss The Boogeymonster over in our dedicated The Boogeymonster discussion topic.
Not if it's Enchano-O-Mecho and he buffs few other minions as well.
Assuming you have Windspeaker already and your opponent has low-health minions, this could be better to have than Gruul. Gruul is usually better than this card, but not quite strictly better.
Not as useful as the demon warlocks have that gains +2/+2 whenever the hero takes damage as it is easier to proc. It does seem fairly meh. I can only see this used in a wild deck with the mech that gives a random buff (windfury/taunt/divine shield) randomly to all minions... or with Paladin's 2 cost minion that gives divine shield. Too easy to remove pending BGH nerf (kills one creature then dead.
We haven't seen the whole set. However. Unless Big Game Hunter gets a nerf, This is worse than Gruul
NOT THE WORST LEGENDARY ANYMORE!
Hemet is worse tbh
no he still is the worst
Well I got only one question. How is this a legendary card? Blizzard ran out of ideas for legendary cards and made this originally common/rare/epic card into a legendary or what?
why legendary rarity though? this card is a rare at best ... legendarilys need to be... well LEGENDARY (even if they are not that viable)
It feels like they are testing this in Tavern Brawl, with that thing in KT's deck
This could have been 7 mana.
Wrong, even that fluffy panda has his uses in specific decks/spell lockdown via Piloted Shredder
so this card gain +2 +2 when it attacks and another +2 +2 after it kills something right?
No, its saying it needs to be attacking and killing the opposing minion to get the +2/2 as opposed to your enemies turn attacking with a minion that dies, in that case, he will not obtain +2/2. This card is dead weight.
the reason i am asking this because for a certain hunter epic monster , they used the sentence "whenever this minion kills another minion, it may attack again" so why not using it for this too "whenever this minion kills another minion it gains +2 +2"
Clearly stated on the card here bud, when this minion "ATTACKS and KILLS" not just "KILLS."