New Neutral Epic Card Revealed - Naga Giant
Tarreo.com just revealed a new Voyage to the Sunken City card: Naga Giant
Voyage to the Sunken City Card List & Expansion Guide
Learn more and see all the cards in our dedicated Card List.
Tarreo.com just revealed a new Voyage to the Sunken City card: Naga Giant
Learn more and see all the cards in our dedicated Card List.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
If you get a good draw you can play it for free on turn 6 so that neat, and still not to crazy.
Right, now all we need is a Naga Rager and the expansion is complete
Yes, very unninspired expanshion.
Ahahah yes. 3 Mana, 5/1, Dredge.
We can be hired in the design team.
10 times worse Arcane Giant
Theoretically speaking, if you ONLY cast spells every turn:
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 = 15 this would cost (5) mana on turn 5, this very bed kard.
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 21 this would cost (0) mana on turn 6, this very ok.
Spell Priest can gain mana back with new legendary and play it on 5, maybe
Yup, this works in a different deck. Arcane Giant was better for spellslinger decks. This baby is better for control-heavy decks. Different cards, different archetypes. Not comparable I think.
Any deck that ran Arcane Giant in Wild can now double up on Giant-y goodness. Plus this is obviously available in Standard now.
I'm not 100% sure about that. It really depends. I think Arcane Giant worked better with spellslinger decks, with lots of cheap and mana discounted spells. I find this could be better for a control heavy deck for mid to late game threats.
Do they still exist?
Hmm if Paladins are getting Holy Spell support, this would fit nicely into it.
never. paladin cheats his spells, this guy strictly demand to spend mana on those spells
You iz righttt, yeah this is 15x worse than Arcane Giant
shouldnt it be Giant Naga?
No, cause is not a naga.
The names of the 8/8s that reduce their own costs are always ______ Giant, so I think that’s why it’s in that order specifically. That, or they didn’t think it was important. Either one.
But but, the tag and name contains Naga, am I nagatting something here?
Not necessarily. I think it is supposed to continue the pattern of giants in Hearthstone that cost less for performing a certain action. Molten giant cost less by the player being damaged, Sea giant cost less for each card on your board, Mountain Giant for each card in the hand. This one is called Naga Giant for consistency and because it still fits in that sort of archetype.
Its a naga unit, but not strictly a naga.