Hearthpwn

Often you gain bad cards as well. Druids can ramp up first turn and play a Yeti or bigger minions. Often it wins them the game right away. Still, it is not a common thing. To be honest ca not remember a moment where i lost due to a bad Unstable Portal minion. Right now the Mage is out of the meta anyway. Shows that the card can not be so broken.

My money would be on Dr Doom since that card has much bigger value than mana cost and no throwback like unstable portal which can pull 0-2 mana minions you or something which is entirelly useless. 

Dr. Boom needs a nerf so bad. He's can do a minimum of 11 damage and a max of 17. All that for 7 mana. Undertaker is stupid powerful but there are enough options in the game to remove him on turn two. I think only paladins don't have an option against a 2/3 undertaker on turn 2. I know you aren't always going to get that removal spell every game but there are early game cards to stop an undertaker cold. That being said I wouldn't be surprised or upset if he gets nerfed.

Undertaker NEED nerf but Savjz said it much better than Ben - "they can't nerf undertaker because a lot of people payed real money just to get that specific card from Naxx"

That card is nightmare for a lot of classes and saying it is not nerf worthy is really bs .... also terrible when it comes later? Aren't all 1 drops terrible when they come later? Like I won't be happy seeing Argent squire at turn 6 or 2/1 murlock card 

I doubt that this is an issue. People paid a lot money for packs as well, still no reason to leave the cards as them are if they are too powerful. What i am thinking is a different argument:

Blizzard does benefit of Naxxramas having some very strong and often essential cards.  If there are essential cards in later wings people are going to be more motivated to unlock Naxxramas with real money.

You pay for packs to get random cards and even if you get the one you wanted you can after nerf disenchant for FULL PRICE back . You pay for Naxx to get specific cards which after nerf you wouldn't be able to disenchant. There is a huge difference in that.

It would be technically same like ordering pizza and you get just 1/2 of it because they decided to nerf it to half. They would need to make some compensation for it which would cost them money / refunds and people who spend money on it would complain a lot and rightfully so

When they nerf a card, you can DE for full dust, so I don't see the issue. Maybe for UT they can make it more than usual dust, to account for the dollar cost of the Naxx wing.

so if a card is "very powerful" it doesnt need a nerf but if its "a little bit too efficient" it does?  come on man

still feel that undertaker should get only attack buff.

"new players could find the game harder to get into, and harder to learn, the more cards we add." harder to learn? not rly.  harder to get in to when you go up against a full pay2warrior on ranks 20-15 and you realize how much gold you need for classic, gvg and naxx while doing 40g dailys? the most problem i have when convincing new friends to this game is convincing them its not pay2win. rly curious what solutions unique to blizzard they have in mind.

also pls pls add option to chose which pack you get as arena reward. just add a pack token you can exchange in shop for any pack you want and give them an expiration date of like a week so ppl cant stock pile them for new expands. cant be that hard

ps. this always makes me laugh 

Looks like someone forgot to draw their firey win axe!

yeah i have a hard time convincing my friends that this is not pay to win as well.  As with all card games, hearthstone is not an exception to this rule.... You either have to put a lot of time or money to get efficient decks...     Sure, you could say that you could have a really good cheap deck, but who wants to play the same cheap decks over and over again without any variety you can get from legends and epics.   All card games need a time or money invested to get some return.   Imo, I am not happy with my return on investment with hearthstone.  Maybe card games are not my thing, I dont know.

Eat it, you botting losers.

I want the answer to one damn question. Are we ever going to see a buff? I can think of several CLASS cards that need a small tuning, not to be necessarily competitive viable but at least usable. Kidnapper, Dust Devil, Lightspawn, etc. I understand the need for "weak" baseline cards like War Golem or Magma Rager, but I don't see why we can't make Lightspawn a 1/5 so it can at least ping if silenced or Dust Devil not Zap-o-matics bitch.

Yeah, I gotta say.. especially with a card like Kidnapper that is an epic class card and is quite literally never played.. something needs to be done.

i agree. mby not on unplayable commons but on epics most definetly. especialy on rogue who feels like always gets the short end of the stick on his class cards (tho Sabotage is awesome)

I beg to differ. New cards can bring new things to the table. If I want a sap on a stick on a rogue minion why make a new card and not buff Kidnapper? Then make a new card with a completely new concept?

soooooo... no word on dr boom or handlock....

You won't get any hints on what cards they may be targeting for nerfs until they announce them. Any interview with a Blizzard employee is basically an empty interview where the future is concerned. They can be pretty informative on past actions they've taken, but you will never get anything out of them concerning future development.

I haven't had anything I've wanted to write about. And I'm a shitty deck constructor. So it limits possible content. For all intents, it's a dead project. On the other hand, I have more time for other things.