Iksar on Basic and Classic - Set Goals and Nerf Philosophy
Hearthstone's Lead Balance Designer, Dean "Iksar" Ayala, was out on reddit early this morning talking about the goals behind the basic and classic sets. Here's our quick recap and his post.
- Basic and Classic sets are meant to be the introductions to the game's mechanics.
- Basic showcases the game before a player invests time and money into it.
- Classic teaches players core mechanics.
He then went on to talk more about why and when some cards in these sets get changed.
- A big problem with cards in these sets is when they become auto-include in all archetypes for that class.
- They make changes to these cards over time but only when it would be positive for the current game.
- Wild Growth and Nourish were nerf targets for a while. They finally pulled the trigger because of how powerful druid was for so long.
- Basic and Classic cards get nerfed instead of rotated when they support class fantasy but are too powerful.
Quote from IksarIdeally the basic and classic set show off the kinds of mechanics each class is about without having too many cards that show up in all possible class archetypes. Basic is important to us because it serves as a set of cards players can use to learn about the game before they choose whether or not to make an investment of their time or money. Classic is important to us because it serves as the secondary jump-off point where you learn the baseline for what each of the individual classes is about along with some of our core mechanics like Battlecry or Deathrattle. From a gameplay perspective, having these sets around forever usually only leads to negativity when the cards are so powerful they show up in every deck in every expansion, making the strategies players use feel more stale than they would otherwise. We've been trying to change some of these power outliers over time, but only when making that change might also be positive for the live game environment. Wild Growth and Nourish were good examples of cards we had thought about changing for some time, so when we arrived in a meta where Druid had been very powerful and popular for a long time, it felt like a good time for those changes. We'd like to continue making these types of changes, as we believe the game will be in a better position to meet the player expectation that the game is new and fresh from expansion to expansion.
We nerf basic/classic cards that are too powerful instead of rotating them when they hit on class fantasy but at too high of a power level. Ramping mana is a strong identifier for what Druid should be about, so it made more sense to us to have some of the simplest forms of mana ramp exist in the base set to teach players what Druids can be about. It also makes more sense to have those cards be medium power level because if we identify mana ramp as an identity for Druids, it would be nice to be able to make some mana ramp cards from time to time without having to create cards even more powerful than two of the (arguably) most powerful cards in the game. Of course, this doesn't mean all basic and classic cards have to be weak. Generally the cards we target for change are ones that exist in every archetype. Cards like Al'Akir, Frothing, Fireball, or Tirion are probably safe. They are powerful and do an awesome job at selling the class fantasy for the class they represent. They also have some weaknesses and you can imagine an archetype within their class that might not play them. This is a pretty good place to be in.
I probably should have included this in the first post. It's true that reducing the amount of auto-include cards in the base set makes cards from expansions more important if the goal is to be able to create every powerful deck. This is something that's more healthy to solve with things like gold injection events like fire festival, increasing the gold on the average quest, or having a new player experience that awards 20+ packs. We keep a close eye on the the kind of investment it takes (time or currency) to obtain a deck archetype that is fun and powerful. The end goal is to make that a painless experience and there is more than one way to go about that. Having a wide variety of forever cards that are so high power level they are included in most decks is one way to go about it, I just don't think it's the right one.
The main point I think is important to get across here is that we don't ever change basic and classic cards just to solve short-term problems. Warrior was fairly powerful at the time we changed FWA which I think makes the change more palatable. If we truly thought that Warrior was better served in the long-term by have FWA as a (2) mana card, then we certainly would have tried to change expansion level cards rather than something in the classic set. Cards like Sul'thraze, Supercollider, Woodcutter's Axe, and Bloodrazer have all had a little more room to breathe and make Warrior feel different expansion to expansion as a result of the FWA change, which was part of the goal.
I don't play Druid much, what else you got? Yes, nerfing Druid a long time ago would have been better. Then we'd have many sets of cards balanced appropriately.
I don’t need the respect of a Druid main whiner. The only thing bad about the timing of the Druid nerfs is that they should have happened a long time ago.
Both Time Walk and Ancestral Recall has been banned in Legacy. This was done more than 10 years before anyone thought of Hearthstone. Here is the link:
https://magic.wizards.com/en/game-info/gameplay/rules-and-formats/banned-restricted
Furthermore both cards got changed from what you could call Epic cards to what you could call Legendary cards because they got restricted to 1-ofs in Vintage = Legendary in Wild.
Hi design team, I’m not sure you understand your job. It’s to create great metas and protect our investment. This meta is terrible and my Druid cards are dust. We don’t care why you did it. We’re just trying to play your game, but you aren’t making it easy.
Eh, it's 12 meta in row which is terrible. Maybe it's not because they nerfed two cards ;)
100 million accounts - seems like they are doing something right.
I guess this is the the 12th straight meta you can’t get past rank 25. Keep on trying! You can do it!
Stop exaggerating, it's 11 of the last 12 which were terrible ;)
Seriously though, never before has a bad meta been so clearly traceable to one bad design team nerf decision (and timing).
Popularity = right and a generic insult. And just when I was starting to respect you.
Should nerf Swipe too while you're at it. It is pretty close to auto-include.
Not only is that untrue, Swipe is also relatively weak unless combined with spell damage. In fact, the best version of Mecha'thun Druid doesn't use Swipe at all.
I said pretty close to auto-include, not that it is auto-include in absolutely every deck including fringe ones like Mecha'thun druid. Druid is pretty dead class atm and jade druid is only archetype seeing significant play. Swipe is necessary for them to have at least some chances against odd paladin, odd rogue and even shaman.
Mecha'thun druid is not a 'fringe' deck and is hovering around 55+% win rate win the latest version. If that number holds it could reach tier 1 status within the meta.
This isn't very constructive.
Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you can act like a total d*ck.
So called RNG removes skill from the game. It literally spoils the gaming experience whether it favours you or not The mechanics of the game is far from "RANDOM". It feels like the game reads both players hands and situations, then generates forced "Wow" moments via card draw or discover mechanics. The moment they stop having controlled RNG, the cards will start feeling more balanced and there would be more archetypes.
But, how would the serpent men living in the hollow earth feel about this?
Yeah.
Hearthstone needs a new Lead Balance Designer.
You got your PhD in Game Design from which University?
I think druid players become to used with broken cards, fast ramp, insane armor gain, overpowered card draw, etc...
Now the class is in the same speed than the other classes and the players have to THINK, manage resources and put more anti-aggro tools they give up the class.
Will take a least another 3 expansions to druid players learn to play the game again instead only play completely broken and insanely undercosted cards one after another.
There are more Druids than Shamans in this weekend’s HCT playoffs. And as has been said many times by many people, Druid has been broken for four years. They will survive being not so good for four months.
Something needs to be done with the Classic set. If the set is just gonna get HOF and nerfs/changes, it really begs the question on its purpose as the core set that all players will need to obtained first. Just look at the nerfs to Druid.
Unlike the nerfs to Cubelock, which are still being played, Druid is gone from existence. This what happens when the expansions are too focused on pumping up only Ramp archetype of Druid. The Token, Feral and Beast archetypes are only given mediocre support.
This is literally the worst nerf since the Warsong nerf. An entire class gone.
It will at least take another 3 expansions to make Druid alive again.