Hearthpwn

The dust required to craft that Rush Warrior deck is insane. 

As with all Warrior decks. Expensive archetype.

Quote from Valek >>

Went 7-1 from Rank 5 to 4 with that Murloc Mage by now. Very cool deck!

 i was playing against this shit on odd rogue. one ooze and you loose

Rest assured, it doesn't happen every time.

Went 7-1 from Rank 5 to 4 with that Murloc Mage by now. Very cool deck!

Can we even say murloc mage is off-meta anymore? I've been seeing loads of them

I just love, how it says 64.3% winrate on Odd Hunter deck, while best odd hunter deck on hsreplay.net has 50% winrate. Tier 3. Who do I trust more??

There's a huge difference between the winrate of one legend player over the course of 56 games and the winrate of the entire population playing thousands of games at wildly different skill levels.

Sure there's. But it's like off-meta decks for people, not for champions. Are the percentage even that relevant then? Should they write them at all? Cause the deck is called "Odd Hunter [64.3% WR]" - not "someone can go around 70% winrate on this". Like almost every stream Firebat has above 75% winrate. Almost on any deck. Should all those decks be advertised here?

So if you understood that the winrates are expressing two very different statistics, why did you compare them and ask "who do I trust more"? Either your first or second post is disingenuous.

Because the winrates are put there in the first place as a guide for the average netdecker, and if they're not helping someone should do something about it? What's disingenuous about wanting the community to be better learned?

Quote from melheor >>

I never understood Odd Hunter decks that use Blackwald Pixie instead of Clockwork Automaton. You need at least 7 mana to make full use of Pixie, which is as much mana as you need with Automoton, except that Automoton lets you do 6 damage again next turn unless the opponent removes him immediately (and baiting removal is also good). The only benefit I see to Pixie is better resistance to mage secrets, is that why people use her?

Pixie has much more flexibility, better tempo. Get stuck on turn 3 you're OK playing a 3 man 3/4. You're probably dead if you have to tempo play a 5 mana 4/4, AND you can't even play that one on turn 3. In face hunter, you're basically assuming your opponent is going to clear your board most turns anyways, you don't play for greed (i.e., a hope and a prayer that your 5 mana 4/4 survives a turn).

These nuances make a huge difference in face hunter with regards to choosing pixie.

Quote from melheor >>

I never understood Odd Hunter decks that use Blackwald Pixie instead of Clockwork Automaton. You need at least 7 mana to make full use of Pixie, which is as much mana as you need with Automoton, except that Automoton lets you do 6 damage again next turn unless the opponent removes him immediately (and baiting removal is also good). The only benefit I see to Pixie is better resistance to mage secrets, is that why people use her?

 i have always thought both cards work well together. if a Clockwork sticks for a turn, you can do 6 dmg that turn, and 12 next with Pixie!!

Exactly, it's called rush warrior because there's 6 more rush and charge cards than in a regular warrior deck.

Baku?

And now we have a third hunter deck in the meta. 

Do me trade? Nope

Me go face? Yop

I prefer rampage warrrior over that rush warrior deck, it just seems wonky.

Never realised Grimscale Oracle has a spear O.O

*Rush Warrior: A modern-day Warrior deck with a mean, mean stride.*

Love this!

I was wondering if anyone else got the reference.

Rush's one of my fav bands ever:)