Hearthpwn

tsk tsk ripoff

Blizzard, stop adding some random employee's name to these decks. Give the real builders some credit. The warrior list is from Fibonacci. The shaman list is from Tars. And the hunter list is from Kibler. They have all been on stream building and playing these exact lists. Give credit where credit is due.

The credit is being given to the players hitting legend with them not to the original creators.  Blizzard doesn't have easily accessible data on who innovates what. 

Only missing snake trap and kathrena for the Hunter list. I am still sitting on my Nerf dust. Is kathrena worth it to craft?

I got Kathrena in a pack a couple weeks ago and I have to say it's a pretty fun card. If you enjoy the hunter class and want to try out the "big beasts" archetype there are a lot of fun decks that feature Kathrena. You have the deck listed above, a "combo" Kathrena deck with cube and charged devilsaurs, or can go really nuts with Seeping Oozeling, Silver Vanguard and 8 drops for a real "big hunter" type list. If you don't like playing hunter I wouldn't go for it but it's one of my favorite classes and I've been enjoying Kathrena a lot! 

no

Aren't the Secretkeepers in the Hunter deck just dreadful? That card was barely good enough when Secret Paladin was the best deck.

Problem with Kath is you lose all early game options hunter would normally play. Secrekeeper might actually be the bet turn 1 play.

Needless to say this says more about the deck's early game.

Far from it.  You almost always drop a secret on turn 2 and I've won a number of games trading up with secret keepers until the powerful lategame.  

 Hearthpwn please, Samerebro stated himself on this very homepage that it's Fibonacci's deck:

https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1036583-meta-breaker-fibonaccis-combo-warrior-rank-5-to

Edit: I played it a bit within the last few days and it is a lot of fun, but very hard on ladder as it has many weaknesses (many taunts prevent combo, dirty rat can pull grommash, secret mage is too often too quick and murloc paladin requires many early answers) I guess it is THE priest killer, but that's pretty much it unfortunately.
For everyone who opened the required legendarys: defintely try it out it is much fun!

I feel curious about this Shaman Deck, look so wierd.

Had the same feeling. Unfortunately I'm missing both Thrall and Grumble and using 3200 dust just to try out a deck which may or may not work is a bit expensive. :(

Played against that today. Was super chill. Did almost nothing til turn 6, then started dropping Jades and died. I was still curious, checked hsreplay.net and it has like 47% winrate. Not sure what that's about.

Quote from nizouuuu >>

Had the same feeling. Unfortunately I'm missing both Thrall and Grumble and using 3200 dust just to try out a deck which may or may not work is a bit expensive. :(

Quote from nizouuuu >>

Had the same feeling. Unfortunately I'm missing both Thrall and Grumble and using 3200 dust just to try out a deck which may or may not work is a bit expensive. :(

I actually crafted King Krush today and put him in a meta deck.

This is the best timeline.

Been playing Violet Wurm in a few different shaman decks recently.  The group of cards like this are very effective in the current meta with so many decks playing mass board clears.  The potential for the punish after failing to clear these completely is great.

actual winrates of these exact decks on hsreplay:

warrior: 42%

shaman: 47%

hunter: 57%

The hunter deck by the way has been already fairly popular and is percentage-wise about as off-meta as big spell mage, kingsbane rogue  or jade druid

Quote from OoklaTheMok >>

Aren't the actual winrates the ones reported by Blizzard, the company that owns all the data on all the decks ever played? 

Pretty sure the win rates are for specific players piloting the decks not the general public. I remember a time when Patron warrior was around 45%, before the Warsong Commander nerf.