Hearthpwn

I don't actually know how yogg n load works, but I imagine it's more spell-oriented. The deck in my mind is still board-centric with companions and Zombeasts.

Quote from Indrafatmoko >>

You don't. It's not a secret hunter deck.

I didn't say this is going to be some good deck or something, the concept of running minionless hunter just sounds fun to me.

Again, I didn't want to play secret hunter. The concept of minionless hunter deck is just interesting for me. Yeah, tracking helps, but DK Rexxar is not really the core plan, just a back-up plan. The core plan is you win with companions spells (we can have six now!), spells, and weapons, I think Hunter can do that.

Why? secrets, weapons, removals should be enough to hold on early on until you get bigger companion cards or rexxar

Well hey, it's just one additional way to play Hunter. You don't have to be mad if you don't like it.

It doesn't say "RANDOM" tho...

Can we replace this garbage card with this?

Yes plz

They did give a f*ckin machinegun to the answer class...

I crafted the hunter quest and hunter DK in hopes that eventually the class would pick up.   What it NEEDs is card draw. By turn 6 you drop your highmane and hope for the best because you have an empty hand.  There has to be synergy with the hunter weapon otherwise this card is just bad.  

Maybe it wouldn't even need draw if it had actual removal, not that bad shaped positioning garbage they throw at us (don't get me wrong, positioning is healthy for the game, but straight up abysmal in a class that doesn't have regular aoe). If we had removal we could as well curve our early into answering their mid into playing ALMOST EVERY SINGLE LEGENDARY for our mid-to-late.

the good side is that i have one less epic to craft. 

I praise Yogg not to receive this card in the next packs

Oh look, it's another BAD Epic Hunter spell. No one should be surprised at this point. Team 5 has no damn clue what to do with Hunter. The class will continue down its downwards spiral unless the last handful of reveals are top tier to meta divining cards. 

Quote from LatinLegacy >>

Oh look, it's another BAD Epic Hunter spell. No one should be surprised at this point. Team 5 has no damn clue what to do with Hunter. The class will continue down its downwards spiral unless the last handful of reveals are top tier to meta divining cards. 

Quote from Athame7 >>

Quote from LatinLegacy >>

Oh look, it's another BAD Epic Hunter spell. No one should be surprised at this point. Team 5 has no damn clue what to do with Hunter. The class will continue down its downwards spiral unless the last handful of reveals are top tier to meta divining cards. 

 they're probably scared of another undertaker hunter/midrange hunter meta... 

Let's look at this seriously.

First, it looks meant to be played in a deck with only Kathrena Winterwisp and a couple of Savannah Highmane and your choice of a big beast or two.  Will that deck work?  Likely not since Hunter doesn't have the capabilities of removal, AoE and healing to survive that long.  Like, it's literally the worst class for that type of deck.  Big priest is similar, and it can 1. cheat minions out early and 2. has the best toolset for AoE, removal and healing in the game, and it barely works as a tier-2 deck.

And then, on top of that, there's literally no discount for the crippling deck restriction on this card.  I mean, if it was 5 mana.... maybe?  4 mana would pass the eye test, although that would just be too similar to Animal Companion to make sense to be printed. 

We've never seen a card with the restriction of "no minions in the deck".  If there you had to list the classes which relied on minions, Hunter would be #1.  It couldn't be printed for a worst class.  Doesn't make sense.

The only explanation is that the Hunter legendary weapon synergizes with this, somehow.  If it was like a 0/3, when you cast a spell, summon a beast of the same mana cost.... well, then maybe we're talking.  But even something that strong would probably not work because your deck sucks unless you draw it... and doesn't get oozed.

Anyway, mindbogglingly bad card, and I try to give Blizzard the benefit of the doubt on these.  Why isn't this 5 mana?

Quote from GetchX >>

Let's look at this seriously.

First, it looks meant to be played in a deck with only Kathrena Winterwisp and a couple of Savannah Highmane and your choice of a big beast or two.  Will that deck work?  Likely not since Hunter doesn't have the capabilities of removal, AoE and healing to survive that long.  Like, it's literally the worst class for that type of deck.  Big priest is similar, and it can 1. cheat minions out early and 2. has the best toolset for AoE, removal and healing in the game, and it barely works as a tier-2 deck.

And then, on top of that, there's literally no discount for the crippling deck restriction on this card.  I mean, if it was 5 mana.... maybe?  4 mana would pass the eye test, although that would just be too similar to Animal Companion to make sense to be printed. 

We've never seen a card with the restriction of "no minions in the deck".  If there you had to list the classes which relied on minions, Hunter would be #1.  It couldn't be printed for a worst class.  Doesn't make sense.

The only explanation is that the Hunter legendary weapon synergizes with this, somehow.  If it was like a 0/3, when you cast a spell, summon a beast of the same mana cost.... well, then maybe we're talking.  But even something that strong would probably not work because your deck sucks unless you draw it... and doesn't get oozed.

Anyway, mindbogglingly bad card, and I try to give Blizzard the benefit of the doubt on these.  Why isn't this 5 mana?