Hearthpwn

ProTip for new players: Though it can be hard to see, a yellow outline will appear when condition-dependent battlecries are in effect! Use this exploit to bamboozle opponents!

Here is a possible scenario:

You: Hmm... turn 5, I'm gonna discover a card in my opponent's deck with this dragon. I think it will trigger, as I can see a faint, almost invisible yellow outline around the card in my hand.

Him: EGAD! HIM PLAY A CARD AND IT FUNCTION PROPERLY?!?11!/ HOW HIM KNEW IT CAN WORKED?!!33121?

You: *laughs* I am pro.

Quote from HunterPred >>

is tracking really necessary? I really hate the loss of cards.

Quote from Zilean >>

Garrosh is fucking annoying. HEH GREETINGS yeah shut the fuck up there are no more warrior decks that are vaweufweofwoifaweifoaweaww

Quote from martineyemd >>

I just hate "Well Met!" being spammed at me when my opponent has lethal.

Honorable mention: "The pleasure is mine" "Not quite what was planned" 

VA: Say no more, fam.

Alex is never going to be a bad craft. If you ever find yourself in the situation of, "X and Y are both top tier cards. X is Classic set. Y is not. Which one should I craft?" The answer is always safely X.

I don't understand the question. If one "regrets moving" to Standard, wouldn't they just play Wild instead? It's a click away. What are you asking here?

You must be new. Everyone knows that rigged caches prevent you from playing Jade Druid if you are using Geist. If you remove him, coding will match you with Jade Druids only until you put him back in your deck.

This whole thread:

Quote from Magitact >>

You are going to very sad when they announce the Hall of Fame in about a month and the unthinkable surprise announcement is a certain fisherman gets in for sheer lack of play.  Unless you feel like you cannot live without a certain deck, I WOULD NOT DUST ANYTHING FOR THE NEXT MONTH AND A HALF with the exception of the recently nerfed cards of course.

 

I thought this was worth sharing.

Why do you show the whole world that you're a noob, dude?

So I was thinking:

I think it'd be cool if you selected 2 decks before starting a Ranked match, and once you find an opponent, you both take 30 seconds to Ban one of the Heroes the other has selected, then proceed playing with the two non-banned decks. That way, say if the meta is that everyone is using a certain deck you don't have the defenses for and say you're ready for one but not the other, you can ban it, but of course the opponent is doing the same and banning whatever she/he forsee's might be your strongest deck. Gives a wrinkle of strategy where normally, its luck of the draw on what hero you might face.

Anybody else think that might be a cool idea? I'm sure there's plenty of arguments against this, but I wondered what the community thought...

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from Blue_Banana_whotookthisname >>

Cure the problem, not the symptoms. The roots of that problem lie within the ranked system, not aggro.

 And how would you fix the ladder? Aggro is naturally overplayed due to the quick games it provides, i don't see any way this can change. Aggro decks should actually be weak just to compensate this factor. It has been proved that people prefer to play a 55% winrate aggro deck rather than a 65% control/fatigue deck to climb the ladder. I don't see any way to solve this issue other than making aggro bad enough that it doesn't go past 50% winrate. And even then i bet many people would still pick an aggro deck to climb up.

Have you tried testing out decks with 0, 1 and 2 cotw? Or did you just run to the forums so that people can tell you what to think? 

Easy rank 20.