Hearthpwn

Quote from SlipperyBum >>

I don't know who they have in charge of duels but I don't think they know what they are even doing. I think the current buckets and treasures you get with all heros are bugged, I keep getting weapon buckets without having any weapons for example. All together now has been moved and changed like 5 times now? I don't even know why it was moved this last time, it was fine imo.

Vanndar is the most ridiculous thing i've seen yet.

Quote from parishbishop >>

Thanx to all who responded. Its good to know im not alone in feeling this way. Fingers crossed for the much needed nerf to come sooner than later. Peace.

 i cant believe i am typing this; fingers crossed for microsoft getting new talent in, replacing these idiots in charge of HS with game designers who know how to make an actual fun card game ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Quote from FortyDust >>

To me, the worst part is the flippant attitude of Ates, who basically acknowledged that Vanndar was absurdly OP just before it was added, but he wanted to wait and see how bad things would get.

people still take these baboons at team5 seriously? lmao

not overpowered, its straight up cheating. but we already know why it made its way into the game, dont we?

there are many tools available to automate grind in hearthstone. these "bots" do occasionally pop up in casual mode.

nerfs? what do you mean?

this is a well balanced and interactive game

Quote from Kaladin >>

Quote from yabadabadoh >>

Quote from Kaladin >>

Sometimes Blizzard makes cards that inspire whole decks, but they don't create cards with full complete decklists in mind.  They didn't release Baku thinking, "We want to make Odd Paladin a cheap top tier deck in order to counter the F2P argument," for example. 

and yet that is exactly what they did. raid leader and stormwind champ viable, ring a bell? i am still baffled that players think blizzard "didn't intended" certain aspects within their games, or didnt intend to create certain archtypes, like a bunch of cardgame loving hippies. how naiive can you be?

 You're gonna need to back up that claim. 

An archetype is different from a deck.  "Odd Paladin" existed with the creation of Baku just as much as Even Priest with Genn or Odd Shaman.  Genn and Baku are neutrals, they can be used in any class.  To say that Blizzard created Baku specifically because they knew that Odd Paladin would be Tier 1 and wanted to "counter the F2P argument" (whatever the hell that means) is completely baseless. 

 ye go play baku in a hunter or lock deck, see how shit that is. Or genn hunter? that must be realy awesome F2P deck. those cards work well within certain specific card/class combinations. and i used the word archtype to give an example, not specific to empower my argument.

Quote from Kaladin >>

Sometimes Blizzard makes cards that inspire whole decks, but they don't create cards with full complete decklists in mind.  They didn't release Baku thinking, "We want to make Odd Paladin a cheap top tier deck in order to counter the F2P argument," for example. 

and yet that is exactly what they did. raid leader and stormwind champ viable, ring a bell? i am still baffled that players think blizzard "didn't intended" certain aspects within their games, or didnt intend to create certain archtypes, like a bunch of cardgame loving hippies. how naiive can you be?

Quote from TardisGreen >>

Quote from yabadabadoh >>

Quote from Kaladin >>

Quote from yabadabadoh >>

Quote from TardisGreen >>

Quote from aleathas >>

Quote from Lyra_Silvertongue >>

T5 still needs to produce new content to continue making money. They aren't a charity after all.

 

 I think we shouldn't be even allowed two write the words 'T5' and 'Charity' in the same paragraph. Believe me they are not. Do you know the annual income they make? I just quote here what I've written above as a response to these sort of claims:

''The current motivation driven by those who spend tons of real money on the game - which I do not criticise since it is their own choice - is not to have a better game experience, but rather to punish others by aiming to have a deck that makes others whine, which is slowly establishing a definition of satisfaction in HS.''

There is a reason that the high tier decks usually consist of many legendaries that are virtually a must to have to make the deck work, and of course the very funny drop rate of these cards; I only had pre-purchased once, and stopped doing that after I've shockingly found out that I had only 2 worthless legendaries out of 50 packs. 

 Deck cost has very little to do with deck strength.  Odd Paladin is a good deck, even after the nerf.  And it’s cheap.

This thread suffers from a premise failure.

 the only degenerate deck with a good curve and standard supporting cards which makes it actually playable. if you want to nitpick, do it properly. there is a reason blizzard is creating these kind of cards and it's only to show that you can get easy and cheap wins to counter the P2W argument. try playing either zoolock or smorc rogue without the ultimate legendaries, playable and possible to climb ladder with. but climbing to legend without it?  yea sure..

 Blizzard doesn't make decks.  They make cards.  They didn't make "Tier 1 Odd Paladin," they made an all-class neutral Legendary called Baku.  They aren't trying to 'counter the P2W argument,' they're simply releasing cards. 

 you got some serious reading comprehension. let me help you. read again what i wrote, now slowly and sentence after sentence.

I read what you wrote several times.  It’s still ********.

 hey smoochy, give the phone back to your daddy and stop replying to matters that do not concern you. now shuuh

those are official blizzard bots to give you the ultimate experience. by any chance, did they have funny names like SleepyDragon or GrumpyGoose? (mind the capital letters)

Quote from Kaladin >>

Quote from yabadabadoh >>

Quote from TardisGreen >>

Quote from aleathas >>

Quote from Lyra_Silvertongue >>

T5 still needs to produce new content to continue making money. They aren't a charity after all.

 

 I think we shouldn't be even allowed two write the words 'T5' and 'Charity' in the same paragraph. Believe me they are not. Do you know the annual income they make? I just quote here what I've written above as a response to these sort of claims:

''The current motivation driven by those who spend tons of real money on the game - which I do not criticise since it is their own choice - is not to have a better game experience, but rather to punish others by aiming to have a deck that makes others whine, which is slowly establishing a definition of satisfaction in HS.''

There is a reason that the high tier decks usually consist of many legendaries that are virtually a must to have to make the deck work, and of course the very funny drop rate of these cards; I only had pre-purchased once, and stopped doing that after I've shockingly found out that I had only 2 worthless legendaries out of 50 packs. 

 Deck cost has very little to do with deck strength.  Odd Paladin is a good deck, even after the nerf.  And it’s cheap.

This thread suffers from a premise failure.

 the only degenerate deck with a good curve and standard supporting cards which makes it actually playable. if you want to nitpick, do it properly. there is a reason blizzard is creating these kind of cards and it's only to show that you can get easy and cheap wins to counter the P2W argument. try playing either zoolock or smorc rogue without the ultimate legendaries, playable and possible to climb ladder with. but climbing to legend without it?  yea sure..

 Blizzard doesn't make decks.  They make cards.  They didn't make "Tier 1 Odd Paladin," they made an all-class neutral Legendary called Baku.  They aren't trying to 'counter the P2W argument,' they're simply releasing cards. 

 you got some serious reading comprehension. let me help you. read again what i wrote, now slowly and sentence after sentence.

Quote from TardisGreen >>

Quote from aleathas >>

Quote from Lyra_Silvertongue >>

T5 still needs to produce new content to continue making money. They aren't a charity after all.

 

 I think we shouldn't be even allowed two write the words 'T5' and 'Charity' in the same paragraph. Believe me they are not. Do you know the annual income they make? I just quote here what I've written above as a response to these sort of claims:

''The current motivation driven by those who spend tons of real money on the game - which I do not criticise since it is their own choice - is not to have a better game experience, but rather to punish others by aiming to have a deck that makes others whine, which is slowly establishing a definition of satisfaction in HS.''

There is a reason that the high tier decks usually consist of many legendaries that are virtually a must to have to make the deck work, and of course the very funny drop rate of these cards; I only had pre-purchased once, and stopped doing that after I've shockingly found out that I had only 2 worthless legendaries out of 50 packs. 

 Deck cost has very little to do with deck strength.  Odd Paladin is a good deck, even after the nerf.  And it’s cheap.

This thread suffers from a premise failure.

 the only degenerate deck with a good curve and standard supporting cards which makes it actually playable. if you want to nitpick, do it properly. there is a reason blizzard is creating these kind of cards and it's only to show that you can get easy and cheap wins to counter the P2W argument. try playing either zoolock or smorc rogue without the ultimate legendaries, playable and possible to climb ladder with. but climbing to legend without it?  yea sure..

Quote from Nakerino >>

Quote from aleathas >>

Quote from Nakerino >>

What is the actual point of this thread? It is just a load of salt.

OP is whining and making terrible points about what a "good" expansion should be.

0% Value, 100% whining and crying

 At least I do have certain points that could lead to discussion over whether I am right or wrong, your reply here is nothing but a juvenile attempt to fulfill your unnecessary satisfaction to get likes by calling others whiners. I said HS is a good game and this expansion is bad and unsuccessful at this point, given that we don't know what the next expansions will bring, and I also discussed that.

 Spreading negativity and giving uninformed opinions is whining. But hey, there is no law against that. So keep the tears coming.

 freshly made account to troll and whine, these fckin 4channers find their way out of every fckin sewer.

cubelock, the crown jewel of T5's creativity

fun&interactive HS.

i tried to add this guy but the fckin scumbag piece of shit knows he is a degenerate cunt playing a degenerate deck and didnt respond.

we should thank blizzard for this innervating experience lol