Some of the Hero Skins are already included in the Patch 18.0. So they should be available soon.
From my previous comment, here after is the list of the name of the new HERO Skins I was able to extract:
- Nagrand Garrosh (WARRIOR) - [HERO_01d]
- Annhylde (WARRIOR) - [HERO_01e]
- Second War Uther (PALADIN) - [HERO_04e]
- Horseman Uther (PALADIN) - [HERO_04f]
- Warsong Rexxar (HUNTER) - [HERO_05d]
- Scholar Jaina (MAGE) - [HERO_08f]
The images seem still missing in the data.
2
Don't say a card like Cleric of Scales is free, when you have to pay for the Adventure. Galakrond's Awakening is well worth the money, but F2P players do not purchase Adventures.
3
Anyone who doesn't mention Guardian Animals is playing Druid. Any further opinions from said persons, such as OP, can therefore be neglected.
2
Try more. I only run Highlander decks. Argent nerf to 3 mana, and maybe Devout to 7 are good enough nerfs. Nerfing Hand of Adal will cripple it beyond beyond being playable, as it’s literally the only draw-card Paladin has. If you can’t spot the right cards to nerf, there’s no reason for further discussion. Especially since you jump to a conclusion that I play the deck that the suggested nerfs are for, instead of considering the fact one can have an objective opinion on said suggestions.
Good day.
18
Jesus. You seriously just want to be able to play your own meme decks, right? Argent to 4?! Kayn gets Rush? Hand of Adal?! I don’t even know how to properly respond to these suggestions. I don’t even face Demon Hunters anymore...
2
I'm gonna try this out. I do however not like the combination of Vectus and Teron, so I think I'll cut Teron for Lord Barov.
3
I’ve seen you create a dozen of salty threads over the last few days. The general consensus is that the meta is fun, and that there is a lot of variety in decks. Some decks will always be stronger than others though; that’s literally been the same since beta. Learn to adapt, or just leave for a while.
5
Anyone else get PTSD when they read "Evolve and N'Zoth, the Corruptor are 2 cards that they want to bring back in some way in the future."? Oh my...
Jokes aside, some really good adjustments and upcoming changes. I wish they said something about the amount of deck slots, but I acknowledge not everything can be addressed. I'm beginning to really like Ben.
1
It’s not so much that this community is negative; it’s more that people with a negative stance towards a certain action or outcome are the ones you hear. It’s dangerous to then assume the community as a whole is toxic or ungrateful. Take WoW’s latest post of paying their respect to the late Reckful: they introduced an NPC in their game, named Reckful, something the community of WoW was adament about. When they released him into the game, you know what some of the comments were? “Shameful, putting a deceased player into a game that earns them money!” I kid you not.
I’ll tell you this much: about 99% of the community have no idea how to run a game, let alone a business. Everything Blizzard does is aimed at maximizing profits. If you don’t, you’re running your business wrong. There are F2P players that think being F2P still means they should be able to make every meme deck in the game, and if Blizzard does not support them in every way possible, they’re ‘greedy’. Most of us here need to appreciate what this game has done for the F2P-community, instead of always wanting more and more and more. I have one ‘whale’-account and one F2P account, and on the latter, I always have 3 or 4 meta decks I can play. And that’s more than enough for a F2P account. I reach Legend on it every month, I have fun with it, and I can be competitive. There’s literally nothing else I could demand. But it does mean I have to be a lot smarter about my dust-economy. I can’t go out crafting King Crush, Unseal the Vault and Beastmaster Leoroxx, just because I want to play Quest Hunter, and then still have enough dust for all the other 17 decks I want to use my slots for.
All in all; Blizzard has a very toxic community, but it’s mainly due to the fact that it is a massive community. You hear the negativity, and the positive reactions get snowed under, because those that search negativity are attracted by it. That’s what happens on these kind of forums. If you’re happy about the state of the game, which I am, this website and every other forum is a cesspool of complaining manchilds that think they know how to balance a game’s economy, whether it’d be about rewards or balancing the actual cards. I strongly advice you to steer clear of Reddit or Hearthpwn if you’re happy about the game. At very least, until Hearthpwn actively wants to improve the overall quality of the discussions that happen here.
2
Oh hi Mark!
Fun deck, and it somewhere reminded me how strong Highlander Warrior can be.
I did however have a bad run with your iteration, and made some changes to it. My main concern was that you included too many activators for Barov, and lacked any sort of pro-active play. Barov is strong, really strong, but the activators, namely Whirlwind, are very bad cards on their own. Other than that, I made a few decisions based on my ladder experience, which was mainly Druid, Paladin and Priest.
So, all in all, a very strong shell of a deck. But people need to learn to adjust the deck to their own ladder experience. Especially with Highlander decks.I don't like Playmaker for example, and I've found Troublemaker and Scrap Golem far too slow.
Thank you for the deck though, it has reignited my passion for the Warrior class.
2
Yeah... I would like to play more than 2 games a day.