• 1

    posted a message on New card voting

    Dragon hype!

    Seems like a corrupted version of an existing one though? Is this Nozdormu?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Bad Manners and You

    I usually do it quickly. In casual though, there might be games (mostly control matchups) where I play 1-2 more cards in order to show my opponent what I had in my hand, so he knows it wasn't a topdecked lucky win, but something inevitable. An other exception is gimmicky deck stuff, like Randuin Wrynn. If I have lethal but also have a gimmicky card like Mindgames in hand, then I tend to play it first because of occasional trolden situations.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Is "Inspire mechanic" dead

    Kodorider cries silently in the corner...

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Ragnaros, The lightlord!

    Paladin gets a lot of healing recently. I might see it in a Reno paladin with Sylvanas, Cairne, Tyrion and N'Zoth.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Most Underrated Cards

    Nexus-Champion Saraad. Pretty much every card this guy gives you is able to win you games

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on The Aggressive Style of Hearthstone
    Quote from eddiefiv >>

    I don't care either way but would you really want to play in a control meta?  At least against aggro I either win a medium length game or lose a quick one.

     I totally see your point, but there are also people out there who don't consider winning equal to having fun. I play this game in order to have fun, not in order to get as many wins as possible in a short time. I don't care if I play 1 or 5 games in 20 minutes as long as it's entertaining. 
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on I think I made a mistake. Some feedback would be apprciated, thx.

    Why would you want to recraft him? I mean, I wouldn't disenchant him but he was sitting in my collection for a year and last time I played him is probably 6 months ago in a casual reincarnate shaman deck. Even Dreadlock tossed him recently. There are better legendaries out there which are worth the dust.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Basic weapon nerf incoming?

    Good points, so this is entirely possible.

    Or maybe they are just bad at designing weapons and don't realise this.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Warrior Card - Tentacles for Arms
    Quote from Cardstone >>

    Yeah the only saving grace of this is fatigue wars.
    Which is the worst, most boring and less interactive way of playing the game.I think I have a new less favourite card for this set (and that's saying a lot after the travesty that the Boogie Monster and Infested Tauren are)

     Even in fatigue, how is this better than any other warrior weapon? Let's take Arcanite Reaper It deals 10 damage to the face in just 2 turns and has the upside of being playable before fatigue and also trading into big minons. 
    Tentacles for Arms on the other side, needs you to spend 15 mana to deal the same amount of damage over 5 turns! Ofcourse after the 10th turn and if you don't care about mana it might have value, but what are the chances of getting 10 turns into fatigue?
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Warrior Card - Tentacles for Arms

    Guys, Sjow made a joke. It's not the actual card.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on My Theory: lowering the power level
    Quote from KitsuneRTC >>

    Well, i think they will rotate out classic soon. which would make sense. year 2 kill away a lot of classic cards or whole set. kill away tgt and black rock.

     

     I disagree. Without classic, the game would lose it's groundwork. Most of the classes would lose their flair and Blizzard will have to reinvent the core mechanics every 2 years. That wouldn't make sense from economical point of view. I'm pretty sure classic is here to stay. That's why they take nerfs seriously this time.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Whispers of the Old Gods Website Poll Cards!
    Quote from Livesage >> >>
    The casters descriptions can be found at the bottom of the page. The ones below the cards are different and seem to be referred to the cards. I think Agithore got a point.
     No, look again - the ones at the bottom of the page are the same as the ones below the cards.
     You're right, I dropped a line
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Whispers of the Old Gods Website Poll Cards!
    Quote from Sylicas >>

    I'm pretty sure that's a description of the casters lol.

    Daytime Center for Forsen refers to the Forsenboys.

    Trump is mayor of Value Town as we know xD

     The casters descriptions can be found at the bottom of the page. The ones below the cards are different and seem to be referred to the cards. I think Agithore got a point.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Warlock Card - DOOM!
    Quote from scorpion033 >>
    Quote from wictor1992 >>

    That Wilfred Fizzlebang synergy

    Read the card text again
     Read my comment again:
    Quote from wictor1992 >>
    Quote from Lancrost >>
    Quote from wictor1992 >>

    That Wilfred Fizzlebang synergy

     What's with all the people saying Fizzlebang synergy? Draw cards =/= drawing cards from hero power smh. 
     The synergy is being able to play DOOM for 0.
    Forgot to add the kappa though.
     
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Warlock Card - DOOM!
    Quote from Lancrost >>
    Quote from wictor1992 >>

    That Wilfred Fizzlebang synergy

     What's with all the people saying Fizzlebang synergy? Draw cards =/= drawing cards from hero power smh. 
     The synergy is being able to play DOOM for 0.
    Forgot to add the kappa though.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.