To me it offered silence a lot of cards bro maybe you just missed lethal with the offered cards
- Registered User
Member for 3 years, 7 months, and 6 days
Last active Wed, Aug, 21 2019 10:40:47
- 0 Followers
- 194 Total Posts
- 137 Thanks
Aug 19, 2019user-25687367 posted a message on What's your favorite class? And what class do you hate the most? (Regardless of the meta)Posted in: General Discussion
Fav class: Mage. Every mode. Especially Arena.
Least: Rogue. Developed a hate for Rogue during Mill and aggro times (Kingsbane). I play it in Arena because its so strong.
Aug 19, 2019Posted in: General Discussion
Well HS got boring. The last expansion wasnt anything special, beside Zephyris (or whats its called). We had highlander decks before, we had quests before. The new mechanic is new indeed, but doesnt seem that special at all. No hero cards. Solo content will probably be the same as the last few (boring dungeon runs..). No new game modes.
Aug 18, 2019Posted in: General Discussion
No I think its a fine card. In Arena, indeed it is very powerful but you have to adjust your deck to the card. Imagine if you are able to draft it when you already have duplicates. You take the risk to still draft it then? (Assuming the other legendaries options are good legendaries).
In Standard/Constructed you have to build your deck around that card (more or less, even some nonhighlander might run it). You pay for that by only having 1 copy of a card, and that can be huge. Your opponent knows which cards you have or which you dont (for example, against highlander mage you only have to play around 1 flamestrike, because you know he wont have a second one (not considering some card generation rng..)).
Aug 17, 2019user-25687367 posted a message on So why exactly is Blizzard working on another Dungeon Run adventure again rather than trying something new?Posted in: General Discussion
i wish that blizzard bring back the old adventure like league of explores, naxxramas and other adventure like this they were the best
I think the same, I prefer Old adventures, first of all because of the value (700g for a good neutral legendary plus useful rares/epics) and the solo content was more fun. Dungeon run in the beginning was fun but very fast frustrating. Imagine being at 6 wins, the boss has a lucky opener and crushes you and you have to start first. Every start, same way too easy bosses, the animations you cant skip. For me totally frustrating. All other solo content after first dungeon run mechanic were the same (except maybe Boomsday), and that is just so boring and annoying. Wow.
EDIT: Hearthstone needs new content, new changes and not new cards. Toast said he would return to HS (or more like, try it out again) if there were significant changes. But I doubt Blizz will do anything. Remember tournament mode? A draft mode like you have in MTGA would be cool, I know you cant copy it 1:1 but something similar (as in Arena, you dont keep the cards). Literally its always the same. Repetitive brawls. Bleh.
Aug 17, 2019user-25687367 posted a message on The Most Difficult Victory in Hearthstone History?Posted in: General Discussion
Jade Druid Players in 2019 after a new expansion, omegalul. https://clips.twitch.tv/RichExquisiteWormYee
Aug 17, 2019user-25687367 posted a message on How to beat control warrior with standard Reno mage?Posted in: Mage
I dont play Reno Mage but I think its just an unfavorable matchup? I mean, Warrior will probably just outvalue you?
Aug 15, 2019Posted in: General Discussion
False. Big Priest is the very definition of a broken deck. The ability to produce copies of 9-10 cost minions with 1/1 statistics is not questionable. To revive them with their default statistics multiple times mid-game moves the pendulum too far in favor of the Priest player. Your retort to the individual you quoted is flawed. It lacks substance and counter points.
Each deck has favorable and unfavorable matchups that point is valid. The stigma towards an individual deck to be overpowered or broken is generally due to a specific series of events. The stigma is not put into place by those who have consistently defeated the deck(s) in question, it is put there by the ones who do not.
I am one of those who do not bear that stigma, as I have both played the deck and consistently defeated the deck. I have also been on the receiving end of defeat whilst playing the deck.
Adapt, evolve, or taste defeat.
Negative. I performed quite well as Big Priest from March until July of this year with a 70% winrate. This should not be acceptable in a format where a plethora of cards and decks are playable. I do not accept your subscription of the situation.
However, your statement validates my point. Even the iteration of your Big Priest deck has favorable and unfavorable matchups. Favorable matchups 70%. Unfavorable matchups 30%.
This does not negate the power value of the deck.
What if his unfav matchups were just due to drawing his big minions?
Aug 14, 2019Posted in: Standard Format
Always depends on the mode imo.
Wild: Barnes, Genn/Baku
Standard: Dr Boom, Conjurers Calling
Arena: Conjurers (Jeez, I had runs, where that card carried me hard.), Discover cards which can lead into Hero Cards (well at some time when KFT was around and Rogue was able to get another class DK in arena..).
Aug 13, 2019user-25687367 posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2Posted in: General Discussion
At this point, I just hope all the worst happen to the Blizz devs. May they have to find new employees.
Aug 11, 2019user-25687367 posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place! V2Posted in: General Discussion
Wish Blizz would fire Team 5 already. Stupid devs, seriously. Pushing Warrior as the strongest control Class, no other controll class can come close. In return people start playing hyperaggro decks (Tempo Rogue). So sick of this shit. I really really wish them the worst, stupid Team 5. When Brode left I had hope for improvement but they fail every single time. When they forgot about the SnipSnap interaction with the epic priest card (which they had to nerf) it showed everyone how incompetent they truely are. I still have to giggle when I think back. Lmao. Literally even Rank 20 players have seen that combo.
EDIT: I never expected to hate some kind of controll-ish meta. But its true. I mean in general in HS you only get rewarded for winning (even in casual), so therefore you get double punished. Losing and not getting gold. Feels bad man. But having a hard fucking match against a warrior for like 20-30 minutes or longer just to lose in the end because he started out-valueing you with Turn 7 Dr Boom feels really really frustrating. Time to install MTGA again.
Aug 10, 2019Posted in: General Discussion
Warlock is fine. Stop crying here. Lord J is pretty balanced. First of all, not all people play highlander decks, non-highlander decks dont have access to the pact. Also Lord J isnt popular for a loooooong time. I dont think buffing him would be a good idea, Warlock heropower is already very strong, giving warlock then the ability to replace its heropower with something more control-ish? Nah fam. No. Other (class) legendaries from the Classic set arent popular, but ofcourse it changes, but as Lord J being a Classic card: dont touch the powerlevel.
I dont understand what you mean, Warlock doesnt have an identity? Same for the examples, Brawl determines Warrior identity?
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.