Hearthpwn

at least 70%? the fuck?

Its clearly a problem with you buddy... either you're playing while tilted which is not a good thing since you're not going to be focused completely on the game or you simply are piloting these decks wrong. Also switching decks isn't pointless since the possibility of counter cueing does exist to the rock paper scissors thing works in your favour. For me I just rotated between control warlock, Even paladin and quest rogue to get to legend day 3 this month you have to play it smart and not just complain about how unfair/stupid It is which I agree it is and that's why the nerfs had to happen so now its probably going to be much easier for people to only pilot one deck.

Why do you use Bwonsamdi, the Dead while you only have 3 1 mana minions?
I at least expected Spirit of the Dead in here.

Either combine those two, or just get rid of Bwonsamdi, the Dead .

Aside this, I like your idea and think there's some serious theorycrafting to do to get this at least semi-working.

Edit: This deck will struggle hard against Warrior and Druid. You either win fast or lose. So I think Bwonsamdi, the Dead is a dead card in here.

Battlecry: Stall Combo for 5 turns.

*Lets break the weapon and play this

Otk pally doesn’t need to guess his opponent’s lethal turn

They are anti-Control decks.

Advantages:

Ice Block:

1- Forces all damage face to pop it, which can result in bad trades for the oponnent. Time Out allows perfect trades;

2- Has flexibility since it can be set up on any turn;

3- Doesn't need to predict lethal plays and cannot be misplayed;

4- Better sinergy with cards that restore life (Alextraza; Reno Jackson) and low Life (Moltem Giant);

5- Its also a secret, in order to play around something else, sometimes it may create suboptimal plays or even misplays;

Time Out :

1- Secrets can be destroyed, Time Out will always resolve once played;

2- Can prevent damage on its own turn as well (weapons, damage-to-hero minions);

3- It locks the health pool from damage, so it has the possibility to prevent more total damage then Ice Block.

I don't hate it, it has it's own solidness in defending

unlike Ice Block and Evasion, this is a regular spell card that can be used for trading against minions you usually don't want to trade with. Paladins has the habit of trading with weapon most of the time when needed. And immune until your next turn is also very helpful to prevent major damage or lethal for a comeback.

I can see this card in control decks for sure.

You wouldn't run this in Odd Paladin, as it isn't an aggressive card, and you CAN'T run this in Even Paladin. Other Paladin decks... don't exist right now.

Furthermore, your hero is Immune, but your board is still very vulnerable. Paladin needs a board in order to actually take advantage of a free turn, they can't just double fireball your face after you kill all the mage's minions. Best they can do is pop a weapon, and their buff spells are useless if none of their minions survive.

Oh, but I'm not even done. For all the bitching people do about Ice Block, they forget that it failed to ever put Mage at Tier 1 or make the class "overpowered.", or at least it hasn't been that way for a LOOOOOOONNNNGGG time. You could reprint Ice Block and un-nerf Mana Wyrm and I still don't know that Mage would be in even the vicinity of being too strong. And here's the thing: Ice Block is significantly BETTER than this card. You're all seriously underestimating the ability to be able to play an Ice Block retroactively rather than this, which must be played proactively. It's less Mana you can use on your turn to play something to combat their board which is presumably already winning if you need to play this. And, as I already covered... this sort of thing is MUCH less effective in Paladin, which isn't a class that can just kill you with an empty board the way Mage can. 

I quote Shakespeare. "Much Ado About Nothing." I honestly don't even expect this to see play as is, unless there are some cards printed that heavily support it.

Could probably throw Genn in instead