Hearthpwn

Quote from Twitchy >>

Sooo many awesome cards, but a few are so op that everyone plays the same deck. 

Exact same story every expansion for over 5 years straight now. Is playtesting truly that much more difficult than we can see as a community? 

Why do so many people seem to think that Galakrond Shaman has like a winrate of almost 100 percent and a playrate of 50 percent? The winrate is 60 percent and the playrate is around 8 percent according to hsreplay

Quote from C_A_W >>

Shaman can't lose. 

 Bullshit it has 60 percent winrate 

Quote from Majora >>

Shudderwock is absolutely not a problem card.

I doubt they'll touch Galakrond, at least not yet anyway.

Dragon's Pack is just fine for a "strong DoD card" just like a lot of other strong DoD cards.

Corrupt Elementalist mayyyy get a slight cost nerf, but again, not one of the most problematic cards so I doubt it.

Mogu and Invocation of Frost are both fine as they are.

Corrupt the Waters I see being their biggest target. I'd say that's gonna go up to probably 8 or 9 Battlecries.

 I am sorry but that is nonsense, the best Shaman deck does not even run the quest, it is Galakrond Shaman 

Quote from Svintusevich >>

Combo priest from the previous expansions works very well agains shamans so i don't know boys what you are talking about =)

 Stats do not lie mate 

Quote from bigbrotherandsister >>

Pretty sure Highlander decks will bye bye without the need to include the seagull thanks to all these dragons that are coming. And that's fine, because that's what Blizzard wants: people to stop playing their old decks and spend money on new ones.

 If Blizzard had wanted that they would not have printed another no duplicates card 

Why 5/2 isnt it a 5/5

It doesnt even need dragons, it is good by itself 

dude stats dont lie you can not disagree with them 

Quote from Lycaon55 >>

I think it will more of the same...just few cards will actually be used and the rest will be crap. The new expansion will not change what the meta is now.....dominance of a few classes and you will meet over and over again the same decks after the meta settles...It's been like this for some time now and we still play the game right? Like I said nothing new..

 I mean, how is a game like Hearthstone supposed to work differently? There is always a meta and the intention is not to have all 135 cards played.

Quote from TrevoRaven8 >>

Paladin's ADD design was its downfall, I think. Aside from them, most other classes have at least solid packages. No one class (besides Paladin) really lost out this time around.

 What???????? Quest Paladin is a really good deck, you have to be kidding

Bomb Warrior actually represents the real meaning of "uninteractive": the opponent has no way to interact with the bombs in their deck, its just random when you draw them

Quote from ThreeOfFifteen >>

Quote from Virshuam >>

It’s a bait from a salty troll, the card is obviously one of the strongest ever printed..

 Tell that to the poor fella who summoned an animal companion.

 2 mana 3/2 "draw a very good card you can play on curve" is insane i dont know what you mean

Quote from ThreeOfFifteen >>

Quote from laadeedaa >>

Learn how to use him properly and he wins games. 

 

Troll post?

 How do you use a RNG card properly? Do enlighten.

 It isnt RNG it is an algorithm so if you use him and know he is going to give you lethal, then he will give you lethal

Quote from Mazi >>

Quote from mjwgamer805 >>

Long control fatigue games are great at times but I don't think it's a "healthy meta" if there's nothing but control decks and no viable aggro decks. And vice versa. A healthy meta in my opinion (plz don't get triggered) is when there are several different types of decks that have close to a 50-50 match up. *NOT different decks* bc you can have 6 different aggro decks- not a healthy meta. But different types of decks (aggro, midrange, zoo, secrets, control, etc.)

Don't think CW is the savior of ranked by any means though.

 True. Actually in meta there are several aggro decks, and only 1 control deck. So, we need more control, right? I am following your arguments.

 You saw that he wrote "close to 50-50" right? 

Quote from Motions >>

I would like to get rid of the coin too.
The downside of the second player will be corrected by having 1 more card in the mulligan.
They should just stick with that.

 No, overall going first is such a big advantage that even with coin and 4 cards the second player is still slightly unfavored in the majority of the matchups