Hearthpwn

Quote from FreKid12 >>

Are the nerfs really needed? Thats the question.

On the start of each expansion , there are some cards that we already excepted that would be too good (ex: KFT – Spreading Plague 5 Mana cost, Ultimate Infestation, etc ) and another ones that were a surprise – K&C made the strongest deck with Cube + Nzoth.

When an expansion is released, the first days are the madeness in ladder for those who love to experiment new strategys and new combos. Thats the most exciting part of playing HearthStone, and thats why we have 3 expansions per year to get the game competetive and not stuck in time (people tired of playing the same decks each day)

Now we got the new year, the Raven.With the rotation, a lot of cards that we loved to play leaved the game leaving a meta undefined. Andfor me , thats cool!

In the first 2 weaks of the expansion, we saw each class with different decks with different archtypes. Aggro, mid range and control, we have everything. So why Whitchood has the lowest impact in meta? Looking at the numbers we think that. But the truth is that some cards of the newest expansion defined the new and old decks like Baku and Grennmayer. Thats the point of an expansion, not everycard needs to be good, we just want that they crush the previous meta or improve it. Thats what happen. I never saw the fisrt weaks of this expansion like the others. After a weak, we already knew which decks were the best but on this new one we didnt. Hunter was so good on the begging..... Shadowacker was insane( at least people thought ). Hagatha was played.... Goffrey was the MASSIVE REMOVAL. That was so fun for me.

But now the meta stablished. We have Paladin with his Aggro/Mid Range decks with the best Win Rate, but we have counters for it. We have Cubelock or Control Warlock and we can beat them. Everyclass in this moment has decks that counters them and they are from almost each class. Yes i know, you “cant” beat warlock so easily. And aggro are also difficult to beat. And Taunt Druid and Warlock are complicated. Oh Spitefull on turn 6, you are so insane.

But lets face it. We all care about winning , and if we get the match that we are not good vs it , we “cry”. When it ´s good , we BM the others one. That´s the meta. Thats the comeptitive style.

So why the changes after all? Are the ladder so hard to beat? Dont we have already so many counters? Thats why i dont think this nerfs are good. You need to study the meta to beat the meta. If you play for fun u have CASUAL.

Now the nerfs are going to hit, and we will knew a new meta. It will be as good as i think it is , or it wil be worst and you wont undo what you ve done Blizzard?

Let´s see what will happen. Good games to everyone!

i'm sure these brain dead players will play control lock because thats also a brain dead deck

this deck is bad

thats why he said he made a change try taking english class it should improve your ability to read

what are you saying?

ask yourself that you aren't forced to watch it no one expects you to

2018 and dumb bitches still can't add time stamps to their 2 hour videos 

and every shudderwock deck is running shudderwock and life drinker