Hearthpwn

I don't think Bloodbloom is that big of a deal, but Barnes should be nerfed. 6 mana barnes would be acceptable, still playable but not too oppressing. 

You can practically get everything for free if you play enough. However, Blizzard doesn't owe you anything, people work for you to enjoy hearthstone  and they need to get paid. The game is F2P but you can't expect to get everything without even spending time on the game. 

That's why wild is called wild. You will see whatever people want to play no matter if it's OP or trash and you have to deal with it. Just build decks that counter whatever you encounter or take a break to chill a little.

The answer is simple. Blizzard doesn't work for you, they want their game to be accessible to everyone so they made this change. After all the change affects only mobile-casual gamers so if you are so rich and superior to other hearthstone players get a PC or just deal with it and stop whining for no reason...people like you ruin the community.

Definitely! The only people who voted no are salty kids that can't get bundles and they think nobody should get good things...20 for 20 packs + a hero skin is a good deal. I wish we got more deals like that either as a pre-purchase option or as an event promotion.

I agree that Branching paths does too much for its cost (especially the armor is too much), but I don't think you see the combo you described at turn 5 every day, at least I do not see it. Having the perfect cards from the beginning of the game would allow that, but having the perfect cards can be oppressive with any class. And for spreading plague+branching paths to have real value at turn 5 it means that the other side of the board is pretty good too, so maybe it's not so much a matter of "too much" power but a matter of perspective! In my opinion a zoolock with a full board of 4/5s or 3/4s by turn 4 is far more oppressive (and "dangerous") and there is actually not much I can do to deal with it no matter the class I play. That's the only reason I am concerned about the Giggling Inventor nerf...

The nerfs seem quite fair. In my opinion Mana Wyrm will still see play but it won't be that snowball-y at the beggining of the game, which is good, the Aviana-Kun combo has been going on for ages so I like the nerf, it feels like for the first time Blizzard nerfed the problematic card and not a new good (but not the problem) card and Giggling Inventor...well, the nerf was kinda needed! 7 mana is too much for the stats for sure and now we have no (neutral) protection from aggro decks but I can understand the argument that it would make even decks even better if the cost was changed to 6 so I guess making it unplayable was the only way. All in all I like the fact that only 3 cards were changed and the nerfs seem fair. For the ones complaining about druids... learn to play and use tech cards in your favor, spreading plague can be played around or destroyed with Mossy Horror (or many class spells) and Malfurion is far less oppressive than Gul' Dan and Jaina so stop whinning! 

UI should have been nerfed 2 expansions ago so we shouldn't expect it to be nerfed now, it's too late! :p Spreading plague is ok in my opinion, the cost is fair, you can play around it and you also have counterplays like Mossy Horror and many spells in most classes. The DK is also fine, Gul' dan is a lot more oppressive and Jaina can turn around the whole game as well, so i think asking for a nerf to Malfurion is unfair!

Well new players can buy cards as well so it's expected that there will be people at low ranks with good decks. It doesn't mean that they are smurfing  necessarily, but a good deck helps for sure...

Thanks for your responses! Well I guess I am a little prejudiced :p I will accept and add more people from now on, you are right, not everyone is toxic :)

Kel'Thuzad I started playing Hearthstone in Naxxramas and Kel'Thuzad was my absolute favorite card back then. It still is actually! :p

lol of course it's not like I am marrying them but I don't like toxicity so if I can avoid it by declining a friend request I just do it! :P What I mean is I would like to know if someone is toxic before adding them...an in game chat that could be muted would be nice for that.

I think that most of the players that reach (high) legend regularly could become professionals if they had enough time or guidance from more experienced players. Like you said many people have work or school as a top priority in their life so they do not dedicate that much time in hearthstone even though they may get to legend every month. I guess it all comes down to what you want to do in life and how much you try to get there. 

Hey guys! I was thinking that every time that some "previous opponent" adds me as a friend I just decline because I assume they just want to shit talk. The truth is, I don't have many friends in Hearthstone and I would like to know if someone added me to call me names or they just thought I played well and want an extra friend to play with. I think if we had the option of in game chat (like starcraft) it would help a lot in finding more people to play with. What's your opinion?

Another Asia only promotion..Wow, who would expect that?! *insert Kappa*