You make people who build their own decks (like myself) look bad, OP.
Oh yeah? The whole three decks?
SO what? only one of his decks has more views than ALL of your decks together, it's about the quality not about a huge quantity of shitty decks.
Is an Old Gods C'Thun deck with 7 legendaries that was dropped a few days before the release of Old Gods REALLY that much of a quality deck? I mean, I get that it has a lot of views and upvotes but is that HONESTLY so much more impressive?
Most people who are great at this game look at the decks on this site as a joke. Why do I make this assumption? The decks being upvoted, viewed, etc have little bearing on how good they actually are. There are lists posted all the time with "80% winrate" and "meta breaker" etc and people go crazy for it. Top level players follow pro's personal postings of decklists, statistics sites that show all decks with their winrates, and so forth. I've literally, never, not once, seen on a subreddit or in conversation with legend players, seen anyone refer to a decklist from this site. Just saying. Why am I here? Cause I like their expansion reveal/card database and saw this post on the front page.
"You're making a lot of assumptions that I'm intentionally hiding something. "
This was your response to:
"Saying it's really strong, yet hiding your rank in the video? Check.
Politely being asked at what rank you are playing at, and responding to that person, without any mention of rank whatsoever? Check."
Which was a response to intentionally hiding your rank when responding to someone asking about what rank you are playing at.
Which was in response to your post saying your deck is strong, with a video curiously editing out the rank.
And somehow, you have totally blatantly decided to hide your rank by responding "i'm not trying to hide my rank".
Look, I regularly help people out with this game and work on decks, gameplay, advancing in rank, etc. I actually do want to help people. In fact, if you are someone who has trouble hitting a certain rank, I'd be more than happy to help you get there.
The "issue" if you can even call a hearthstone debate an issue, is you just made some bullshit clickbait that decent players like me saw. We thought, wow, some original fresh deck capable of hitting legend, let's take a look.
You're free to admit you misspoke, overestimated how good it was, hid how many games you have under your belt with it at rank 5 or above, etc. Nobody here needs therapy, not even you, based on this discussion here. We're just giving you shit so hopefully in the future you come back with something truly original, powerful, and proven. Then we can have a great, in-depth discussion as a team.
Yeah the problem with both of those priest decks is that they are uninteractable. You really have to try to burn them down quick because of the style of both. Pretty much everyone wants to have some sort of a back and forth in the card game. With these decks it comes down to things like "did he have dragonfire potion or able to discover to kill a board) or (did he draw barnes by turn 4).
That said...I myself have never had more fun playing priest than right now. I love playing both decks and I've always hated playing priest (although Rogue is still my least favorite).
As a primarily rogue player these days, would you mind sharing your personal opinion of what your gameplan is against miracle rogue? what cards of theirs you fear most or expect to be played at specific times? Interested in some tips and insights from "the enemy".
I understand the dislike of Rogue, as a Priest especially, though. It's certainly always been my favorite class match-up!
Hey OP, don't mind the hate. I mean, I hate pirate warrior too, but since you're a new/novice player, I'll offer some tips!
1. Pirate warrior is very good. I routinely have play sessions of 6-1, 8-3, etc and were talking at ranks 4 and such.
2. While I barely ever play pirate warrior and enjoy playing control and combo decks, and avoid aggro generally, I still do extremely well with it. I don't believe a single pirate warrior list I've run for a dozen games or so has ever not yielded a positive winrate. My point here is, pirate warrior is a very easy deck to play. It's all relative of course, so by easy I mean easier than miracle rogue, renolock, etc. Like all decks, skill will still be a factor in how well you do of course. I recommend reading some of the great guides the community has written on this and other decks in the future you may be interested in.
3. You likely have a lot of room to grow. You said something along the lines of hitting rank 14 or something for the first time, etc. If this is the peak of your ranking, and you play regularly, then you will see your play excel as you get better at the game overall.
4. As for quick fixes, right now: Stop making decisions like "the pros and statistics are all wrong! I know better than them! I'll run this card!". If you are already selecting one of the best deck archetypes, you might as well also play one of the best lists. (This was mostly triggered by your seemingly offhanded remark about removing hydras).
5. You picked pirate warrior at one of, if not the, weakest point since pre-MSoG. You cannot expect it to perform as it once did, as the clear-cute number one boogeyman. There is a large amount of decks being played that can handle pirate warrior relatively well, making these matchups slightly in pirate warriors favor, instead of a blowout.
6. Face Hunter was a face deck, where you went face with everything most of the time. Pirate warrior is not like that, it's played more like a normal aggro deck. It just smashes face, and smashes it well.
Good luck man, and if you don't love the deck and aren't having a blast playing it, I'd recommend playing another powerful deck.
P.S. As a player you evolve from not trading enough, to trading too much, to going face optimally.
what is a card you think is undervalued or overvalued by the comunity or just any unpopular opinion.
I think while everyone is talking about death knights and legendaries, Bonemare will be a 10/10 card that will take everyone by suprise as the next Doctor 7.
You say name something underrated or unpopular then go on to name one of the most widely recognized, obviously strong cards in the set.
0
what's better, tempo rouge or rasakus priest?
15
Love the Oasis Snapjaw tech for Explosive Runes.
9
you can't. it's overstatted for it's cost. irreplacable. just play another deck.
2
Meant as a joke, but still one of the best decks on here. No lies about being a "meta killer" or "80% winrate at rank 18 to 20."
-6
Oh but didn't you see the proof of it's greatness?
"After my populer Jade Shaman deck there was a new expansion Kobolds and Catacombs.
My ex deck >> http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/977702-jade-shaman-73-winrate-rank-20-to-12 "
0
5
When I saw this card image just now, I thought "Look at the comments and find the T H I C C comment". Well done.
Surprised nobody has said she's bae or waifu or whatever they say.
0
2
Politely being asked at what rank you are playing at, and responding to that person, without any mention of rank whatsoever? Check."
Which was a response to intentionally hiding your rank when responding to someone asking about what rank you are playing at.
Which was in response to your post saying your deck is strong, with a video curiously editing out the rank.
And somehow, you have totally blatantly decided to hide your rank by responding "i'm not trying to hide my rank".
Look, I regularly help people out with this game and work on decks, gameplay, advancing in rank, etc. I actually do want to help people. In fact, if you are someone who has trouble hitting a certain rank, I'd be more than happy to help you get there.
The "issue" if you can even call a hearthstone debate an issue, is you just made some bullshit clickbait that decent players like me saw. We thought, wow, some original fresh deck capable of hitting legend, let's take a look.
You're free to admit you misspoke, overestimated how good it was, hid how many games you have under your belt with it at rank 5 or above, etc. Nobody here needs therapy, not even you, based on this discussion here. We're just giving you shit so hopefully in the future you come back with something truly original, powerful, and proven. Then we can have a great, in-depth discussion as a team.
4
Congratulations OP, I'm embarrassed for you.
Trash deck? Check.
Saying it's really strong, yet hiding your rank in the video? Check.
Politely being asked at what rank you are playing at, and responding to that person, without any mention of rank whatsoever? Check.
Being told your deck is terrible on the least competitive, most noob-friendly forum for hearthstone? Check.
Not being humble enough to appreciate what people are telling you, regarding missing power cards, lack of deck focus, etc? Check.
Just lol's all around, here have another.
0
0
So much wisdom. A rarity on hearthpwn and /r/hearthstone.
0
Hey OP, don't mind the hate. I mean, I hate pirate warrior too, but since you're a new/novice player, I'll offer some tips!
1. Pirate warrior is very good. I routinely have play sessions of 6-1, 8-3, etc and were talking at ranks 4 and such.
2. While I barely ever play pirate warrior and enjoy playing control and combo decks, and avoid aggro generally, I still do extremely well with it. I don't believe a single pirate warrior list I've run for a dozen games or so has ever not yielded a positive winrate. My point here is, pirate warrior is a very easy deck to play. It's all relative of course, so by easy I mean easier than miracle rogue, renolock, etc. Like all decks, skill will still be a factor in how well you do of course. I recommend reading some of the great guides the community has written on this and other decks in the future you may be interested in.
3. You likely have a lot of room to grow. You said something along the lines of hitting rank 14 or something for the first time, etc. If this is the peak of your ranking, and you play regularly, then you will see your play excel as you get better at the game overall.
4. As for quick fixes, right now: Stop making decisions like "the pros and statistics are all wrong! I know better than them! I'll run this card!". If you are already selecting one of the best deck archetypes, you might as well also play one of the best lists. (This was mostly triggered by your seemingly offhanded remark about removing hydras).
5. You picked pirate warrior at one of, if not the, weakest point since pre-MSoG. You cannot expect it to perform as it once did, as the clear-cute number one boogeyman. There is a large amount of decks being played that can handle pirate warrior relatively well, making these matchups slightly in pirate warriors favor, instead of a blowout.
6. Face Hunter was a face deck, where you went face with everything most of the time. Pirate warrior is not like that, it's played more like a normal aggro deck. It just smashes face, and smashes it well.
Good luck man, and if you don't love the deck and aren't having a blast playing it, I'd recommend playing another powerful deck.
P.S. As a player you evolve from not trading enough, to trading too much, to going face optimally.
0
He's messing with you guys. I mean I hope so.
0