• 0

    posted a message on Theory: Next Expansion is about Secrets!
    Quote from Dinomaniak >>

    Is anybody else thinking : "Next creature played is shown as a shadow to the enemy, amount of mana spent is hidden"
    where shadow = ? mana _ ? attack _ ? life black card , until it takes or receives an action.

     no you because they will see how much mana you spent
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Theory: Next Expansion is about Secrets!
    Quote from Cornfalk3 >>
    Quote from Firebolts >>
    Quote from paleezer >>

    Murlocs. they need more murlocs. Lots and lots of murlocs. Each class needs special murlocs.

     Unfortunately,Murloc Knight is limiting design space for strong murlocs.
     The same thing, Mysterious Challenger does. Sorry, but I don't believe the next expansion is about secrets:
    1) You only have 3 Secret classes, that would get a huge piece of the cake
    2) Even though, the Weekly Design Competition featured ideas for Not-Mag/Hunter/Paladin-Secrets multiple times, there is no way, Blizzard wants to give secrets to other classes and I also don't want to actually see it.
    3) As I stated in the beginning: "Who am I?" just doesn't allow to give any powerful secrets to Paladin anymore. So there are only two classes left, which could actually get something.

    To make a secret adventure they would need to make all classes also have.

    Weapons
    heal
    and many others unique mechanics that balance the game.

    Also i bet  in Ulduar too.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Starting nerfing mage spells? Agree or not?
     
    Quote from LucasPassado >>

    From far mage is one of the best classes in the game, it's not the strongest in the game, but in my opinion has a lot of spells, a lot of thing no other class has, mage has secrets, mage has + than 4 cleaner boards (and one of the most powerful, flamestrike), mage has very strong "hex", mage has card draws,

    stopped reading here.
    mage have 1 AND only 1 card draw.
    and its +-

    mage is always starving for cards.

    http://www.hearthpwn.com/cards?filter-name=draw a card&filter-include-card-text=y&filter-class=2044&display=3

     

    Posted in: Mage
  • 1

    posted a message on New Card - Master of Ceremonies

    the problem is that hearthstone only have 9 minions with Spell damage... and only 2 see play.

    http://www.hearthpwn.com/cards/minion?display=1&filter-spelldamage=1&filter-token=0

    but 130+ cards... if they add at least more 5 minions.. maybe

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on farming rank 20... wrong?

    I time ago i posted on hearthstone forums and i will paste it here:

    It's way more rewarding to play at low ranks.

    current we have 2 ways to play: competitively and just for fun

    Playing Competitively

    Pros

    challenging games
    bragging rights
    cardback if hit legend
    ??

    Cons

    Same decks every game
    longer games
    less gold
    harder to complete quests
    boredom after playing the same way x the same decks
    takes longer to get golden heroes.

    Playing for Fun

    Pros

    Variety of decks
    shorter games
    more gold
    easier to complete quests
    faster to get golden heroes.
    More fun games

    Cons

    If you are good easy wins can start to get boring.

    Is as if the game was designed to be played wrongly.

    Rewards only for winning is wrong and the main factor here.

    i really like de 100 gold limit for day.

    Quest 40 gold get 40 points playing with warrior.

    losing a game gives you 10 point and winning gives you 20.

    way more easier for new players finish their quests.

    Every 50 points you get 10 gold ( keep 100 gold a day limit)

    and at high ranks you get more points for the wins.

    rank 10 +

    losing gets you 15 points/ winning 30

    rank 5+

    losing gets you 20 points/ winning 40

    for me its a easy way to fix the game.

    change Golden hero to 10000 points.

    same ratio 500 wins x 20 points for win

    you're not giving more FREE stuff like someone says

    You just make it easier for better players to get to the max 100 gold a day.

    something i think good players deserve.

    give us a reason to climb the ladder.

    currently the only reason is to hit legend and get a cardback and to do it you have to play A LOT something like 5 hours a day, if you dont have this kind of free time dont even try you will not hit legend in a month.

    http://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/forum/topic/15699387401?page=1

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on farming rank 20... wrong?
    Quote from TheAnimaker »
    Quote from Axel_Rouche »
    Quote from kVincee »
    Quote from Balckovic »

    man, these "arguments" for farming are plain stupid. Let's summerize, shall we?
    1.) no time, at rank 20 the games are shorter
    => you essentially grind for 500 freakin wins. You HAVE the time.

    2.) how and who does it bother?
    => EVERYONE. You're a newbie and face far more experienced players, you just CAN'T compete with. But instead of helping, they're spamming "hello." Oh, and if you win? They add you to be as salty as the dead sea. Because they couldn't get their free win.

    3.) Don't harm the game
    => Same as above. You know why people don't start to play LoL anymore? Because the community sucks. Until you have an experienced player by your side, you get kicked out, because you're *surprise surprise* a noob. Now to hearthstone: You start, you don't have the best deck, but instead of playing against people on your level, you face the ones, who don't belong there at all. It's like beating a blind at "I see something you don't..."

    4.) would piss legend players off to face casuals
    => So you're fighting the infidels? To keep the gates of hell close? Because they're so many casuals in the top 0,5% of the HS community. For sure.
    /sarcasm off

    5.) It's more competitive that way
    => The fuck you're even trying to say? IT'D BE COMPETITIVE, IF THEY WOULD FACE PEOPLE WITH AS MUCH EXPERIENCE AS THEY HAVE. YOU DO THE FUCKING OPPOSITE.


     

    People improve by facing players who are better than they are. Also, next time you could try and express your thoughts in a more human-like manner. This way, people tend to focus on what an annoying dipshit you are, and forget about what you are actually trying to tell. Don't take this wrong, it's just a little hint.

    >People improve by playing against Sylvanas, Rag etc... with their Sen'jin Shieldmasta and Chillwind Yeti. 

     

    Are you saying you think people improve by playing against Chillind Yetis with Chillwind Yetis? And what about those guys that open 2 packs and get double legendary in each pack? Imagine if there were no farmers, this is how ranked mode would go:

    Without Dr. Boom and Ragnaros - Rank 20

    With Dr. Boom and Ragnaros - Rank 10

    Why? Because all the other players in the first ranks haven't got a legendary(some didn't get epic yet), that's why.

    you will always have the people that like a challenge and people that are realistic.

    you are a free player and have 2 options punch the knife trying to climb the ladder with bad cards.

    or farm for cards and climb when you have a deck.

    hearthstone is like playing basket with a team of dwarves X Giants.

    you can win ? sure... but i bet my money that out of 100 games you will win 1 with lucky

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Medivh the last Guardian & Vereesa Windrunner
    Quote from Nymrod »

    While I'd have prefered Kael (for faction balance) you can hardly call Medivh an Alliance character. He is neutral (the one that isn't roomates with Sargeras that is)

    well you're not wrong but it's not that hard to align him with the alliance.

    member od the Council of Tirisfal  a long date alliance faction  you could say he was of the aliance. 

    Quote from MechBearCat »

    Kael'thas isn't Horde either. He is a Blood Elf, but the race didn't join the Horde until Lorthemar took over. Kael's Outland Elves are a completely different faction.

    I know it's kind of confusing since statues of him are allover Silvermoon, but that's how it is. The Azeroth Elves joined the Horde in order to eventually reunite with Kael in Outland, and once they did they found out that Kael betrayed them all this time. Pretty dumb plot, but I guess that's how you have to tell a story in an MMO.

    This ..

    also : Kael'thas "Kael" Sunstrider was a senior member of the Kirin Tor and the Prince of Quel'Thalas, the last of the Sunstrider dynasty. After the fall of Quel'Thalas, Kael'thas led what remained of his people in the service of the Alliance. Striving to placate his people's addiction to magic, he later covertly allied with Illidan Stormrage, the Naga and the Burning Legion.

    you coudl also say he was a alliance mage.

    HE NEVER EVER HAD ANY CONNECTION WITH THE HORDE.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Medivh the last Guardian & Vereesa Windrunner

    I cant name one horde mage... the famous ones are all alliance.

    Antonidas
    Medivh
    Fordred Aran
    Khadgar ( medivh apprentice )

    cant remember one notable orc / troll mage. maybe a elf.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on complaints about netdecking in Casual
    Quote from MLPosey27 »

    This is a long-standing complaint, that I also hope gets addressed eventually.

    Ironically you'd likely be more evenly matched in ranked mode, where the stronger decks will climb the ranks and less effective decks will stay around 20.

    you really don't know hearthstone, if you believe it.

    in truth rank 20-16 is where the players farm their quest and gold.

    you will only get a  "fair" match rank 16 ++.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Getting past rank 19 without amazing cards

    Anyway, I've been playing as mage.

    there the worst classs for ranked.

     

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Card - Steamwheedle Sniper
    Quote from chizuk »

    They gave hunters a 2 damage fireball hero power?! WTF?!

    Makes Shadow Priest look like second rate stuff too now. 

    (After Feign Death... OMG. Control Hunter inc. Might get me to switch from my Control Mage)

    Mages.. 3 rate than...

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Card - Feign Death

    Why only one class got this powerful card ?
    This is simple unfair... now the only class that worth playing Deathrattles is hunters... 1 card and you guys made they the kings of Deathrattles, the only drawback of Deathrattles is not controlling when they active and now only one class alone dont have this problem anymore....

    worst job ever blizzard.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Returning minions to a full hand

    you're a Golden priest and dont evne know this ?

    bought acc maybe ?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • -5

    posted a message on Hearthstone Bot Ban Wave

    so... full Golden heros + tons of golds + every card + lot of dust = only 3 mounths ban ?

     

    time to start botting...

    Posted in: News
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.