Hearthpwn

@L3xx  "but you claim that Naxx made face hunter this monster, but hunter has always been strong " Until release the hounds was buffed to cost 2 mana instead of 4 , hunter was considered the worst class by far and the more gimmickie, tot he point that at that time i faced only around 10-15  hunter out of 400 won games i had.... the only time i remember that hunter was fast was with the 1 mana realease the hounds. The facehunter i rember was also quite bad you needed the perfect hand to won, it was much worse than shockadin....

this is not by far the worst meta... didn't you remper the crazy freeze mages that did not let you play anything and then killed you?? but for me the best meta was the pre-season 1! if i am not wrong we still did not have realease the hounds, msot of the players were still innovating and tryng diffrent decks, netdecking existed but much less. come on at that time noxious arrived to rank 2 playng ONLY RANDUIM. i rember at this time playing a  kind of miracle shaman with double auctioneer and leeroy xd... it was a variety of meta... managrind still had his swiss tournaments ( how i miss that with this single elimination tournaments where one game loss = it is over) all the deck forms were heavenly represented, with a lot of control, midrange and aggro variants....

i would buy 120-160 packs + i got gold for 25 more +i have 11k dust sitting and waiting... so i hope to get all the cards i need if not i would craft the golden legendaries /epic i think are needed (got too much used to only play golden decks...)

Quote from Xedriell »

Gorehowl would definitely not match the meta around ranks 5-7, so doesn't faceless, hehe. Since I do not own the Baron, I will try to choose between 2nd senjin, cleave, slam, WW and ghoul(s). How would you rank those cards, which would you prefer?

this season i have been quite out of ranked (only rank 6 with very few games played) but i used this seasons and other gorewhol and is amazing against unusual matches but that are counters to control warior, like shaman or paladin control. or even against the more common priest and druid. i know against the aggro deck (specially hunter) is a dead card, but like that a lot of other tech cards, (the usfullness of armosmith against control priest!!! xd)

in 10 days i doubt you would ahve the time....play now to practice but try hard to legend next season ( unless you got a crazy amount of time to grind in this case go!). i think most control decks can achieved legend today, some would have more difficult time (paladin, shaman(control, no midrange), mage) but you should be fine with anyother, with priest and warrior being overstanding.

mm this  + the 3 mana card that reduce by 3 mana cost in an heavyweighted shaman maybe?? ( exclusively for casual mode)

when is the reveal? in how many hours??

So far from more than a year experience playng hearstone arena, i wanted to check if others feal like me : getting a leggendary in an arena run is a liability. 

why i think so?

- normally most elgendaries are high costed  so they disturb our curb.

-most of them are very situational, a black night or harrison jones could be uselless sometimesor win you games.

-theyre value si quite slime, in a lot of cases i would prefer an ogre over illidan, cairne and sometimes even sylvanas.

- you rely on them too much to take you back making underperforming plays sometimes.

So far my runs with legendaries had been quite mediocre (6-9) ( except a 12-0 hunter i had with rag... but i think the 4 animal companios made most of the work)  for most of them compared to 0 legendaries decks, that normally where more consistent.(5-12)

When i even get 2 legendaries the arena goes very bad (4-7).

if it is real it is quite strange... so i ¨kill¨ one of my own minions (without procing deathrattle), in order to be able to resummon  him later with the risk of a random silence to just kill it being the slience alone a 1 for 2.

being raiding in soo hc , all the pauses the players where talking about hearstone, mostly complaining about how op was rogue, then priest. finallly a guildy got a bet key before me and give it to me, i think it was in september -october last 2013. also they knwe i played a lot of mtg before.

how crazy would be mill miror??? never arrived to see/play one.

Quote from joed4no »

If you could have a professional player watch a video of you playing Hearthstone and comment/critique your gameplay to help you improve, how much would you pay for each game reviewed?

i think even with the tips i do not trust the coaching helping you how to play etc... i think only experience help. i tryed to some firends to explain them how to play arena and they are still in 3-4 wins average. maybe the pros are very good explaining but even...

nice and short survey but your results woudl eb higly biased i think most of the people in this page would watch only hearstone and more than the average watcher, this is not only the people that plays hearstone but the people taht loves to write /read /troll about the game , so alitle beat more freaky than average hearstone player.

if you want to arrive to rank 5 (no legend). the  aggro divine favor paladin is better. why? a  control paladin game that you win takes easily 15-20 mins, the agro one takes less than 7 minutes. and even with less than 50% winrate thanks to winstreaks you can go faster in the ladder. and for that deck mukla is a great card (also more wins for golden portrait). divine favor paladin is like the 5th-6th better agro deck ( not very efficient compared to others) but it goes better chances than control paladin agaisnt hunters and zoo so common in early ranks. Also paladin control right now is after freeze mage the most dificult deck to use eficiently.

inner rage is quite niche when is usefull so i would cut one and put a grommash instead for a finisher. 

also do you thought of a rampage? for your deck is tecnicallly 2 mana +3/+3 that can be quite good value, but in other cases is dead card... 

also i dot see why you put the corsairs in agro / middrange i prefer the 4/3 chargers.

but anyhow my experience with a deck like that is veery slim i played it in beta .... a time where hunter was considered the worst class of the game , and thinksmaster was the most op legendary, and harrison jones was considered a bad card in the tier of millhouse.. so times have changed i think xd

i would like to know your results your deck looks interesant.