edit: a more rush-like warrior deck may be the best option against aggro.
I aggree with Headfist, I think a "Controll Rush" archtype would be better vs aggro, but cards like Omega Devastator and Crowd Roaster are nice vs midrange and decks that play big minions but they migh need support and synergies.
P.S.: Can't edit the poll, by consequence can't add one more option (40-44), so let's consider "45 to 49" to be "40 to 49" instead. Sry for the inconvenience.
Thats a good observation, still there are decks that can overcome that, like Big Spell mage, but there are other classes that simply cant compete with the value and tempo of cubelock/ controll lock, like warrior or shaman.
There are three ways beeing used to cheat mana, warlock weapon/ kabal lackey, spitfull summoner and resurrect effects, and they kind of hurt a bit on other controll decks.
But spitfull decks, ressurect priest and big spell mage can beat warlock (cube or controll verson).
And still, some aggro decks like dudeadin, murloc pala and aggro druid can beat him too.
The main problem is that they should did it when they "created" DK hunter, i mean at that time they should have think:
"The new DK hunter picks 2 from all beast (standard or wild) and mix them, we should do it dynamically so in a future expansion, when we realease more beasts they are automatically included in DK hunter hero power"
I m not against Blizzard team behind hearthstone, but i see no excuse for this to happen...
0
I aggree with Headfist, I think a "Controll Rush" archtype would be better vs aggro, but cards like Omega Devastator and Crowd Roaster are nice vs midrange and decks that play big minions but they migh need support and synergies.
0
There you go a list, but needs improvment since i made it in a rush https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1256440-teory-new-controllish-warrior
1
Warrior deck with a lot of removal and the new bomb's thing.
0
Some folks asked to make a poll about the age, so we could have data about data.
So here it goes, separeted by 5 years.
Based on this link: Original Post without poll
P.S.: Can't edit the poll, by consequence can't add one more option (40-44), so let's consider "45 to 49" to be "40 to 49" instead. Sry for the inconvenience.
0
24 years old. No kids. Started playing on WotOG.
4
th3 boomsday 50$ bundle did give you a golden leg too
0
So today I completed the 1000 game wins achievement, and i didnt get the 500 gold reward :(
Am I missing something?
Source of the achievement: http://hearthstone.wikia.com/wiki/Achievements#Big_Winner
P.S.: I already tried to reload the game.
0
its not tier one, but it was the first deck I crafted this expac (on the release day) and it works well against aggro
1
Thats a good observation, still there are decks that can overcome that, like Big Spell mage, but there are other classes that simply cant compete with the value and tempo of cubelock/ controll lock, like warrior or shaman.
There are three ways beeing used to cheat mana, warlock weapon/ kabal lackey, spitfull summoner and resurrect effects, and they kind of hurt a bit on other controll decks.
But spitfull decks, ressurect priest and big spell mage can beat warlock (cube or controll verson).
And still, some aggro decks like dudeadin, murloc pala and aggro druid can beat him too.
0
Hey Djinni,
Should we dust Patches and Corridor Creeper when the nerfs hit live?
1
They said it would take AROUND one week after the championship to start delivering the packs, so maybe between 28-30 january i guess. Hope that helps
1
if you don't use keleseth there are two drops worth to put in like:
12
The main problem is that they should did it when they "created" DK hunter, i mean at that time they should have think:
"The new DK hunter picks 2 from all beast (standard or wild) and mix them, we should do it dynamically so in a future expansion, when we realease more beasts they are automatically included in DK hunter hero power"
I m not against Blizzard team behind hearthstone, but i see no excuse for this to happen...
0
SELECT * FROM cards WHERE type='minion' AND tag='beast' AND format='X(wild or standard)' AND card not in (table of excluded cards);
something like that, just adding more definition to the query, but mainly i agree with you.
Basically they just put the cards they dont want to show, in the "table of excluded cards".
4
area enchatment already exists, for instance Brann Bronzebeard is like that, other example is Raid Leader, or Stormwind Champ, or Murloc warleader.
not shure how they do it but just think like that:
While(Raid Leader is on board){
Minions.onBoard.Atk = Minions.onBoardAtk + 1;
}
for DK Mage i think it is an analogy to that, but instead of checking cards (like the mentioned above), they check the hero iself:
While(Hero is "DK Jaina"){ (its not a while because, even if you cange hero again, the effect persists, but i think you get the idea)
foreach(Minions.onBoard as minion){
if(minion.checkType(Elemental))
minion.addBuff(Lifesteal);
}
}
This are all supositions, i don't know how they implement things, so its an High Level overview. (Just sharing thoughts)