Still no milled cards in history log
- risendy
- Registered User
-
Member for 7 years and 5 months
Last active Sun, Apr, 28 2019 12:23:09 -
- 2
- 21
- 22
- 0 Followers
- 16 Total Posts
- 2 Thanks
-
15
SunbleachedAngel posted a message on Hearthstone Patch 10.2.0 - Patches Nerf Has Arrived, Wild Arena Event, New Card BacksPosted in: News -
4
MifistoSilver posted a message on Wild Aggro MagePosted in: Wild Aggro MageWhy is there no Aluneth?
-
-20
KeyKenzo posted a message on Ben Brode Explains Why Even "Simple" Solutions Take Time - Ladder RevampPosted in: NewsBen Brode Explains Why Even "Simple" Solutions Take Time
Well well ben brode let me say that you guys have not clue of is going on with the game. This game is pathetic, the design, the theory, sincerely, you guys have not fix any meta or bug(like in video above) since 2014. GOOD GAME BLIZZARD !. Yea Downvote little kid.
-
12
seigmoraig1 posted a message on Wacky Waxy Winter's Veil is This Week's Brawl!Posted in: News120 dust exactly what I was expecting so not disappointed.
-
26
yakuzajones posted a message on Missing Daily Quests? Try Changing Hearthstone's Game LanguagePosted in: NewsHow about they just fix it?
-
4
namrax posted a message on Missing Daily Quests? Try Changing Hearthstone's Game LanguagePosted in: NewsYup, sorry bro
-
9
Kamroni posted a message on Hearthstone Patch 9.2 - Trigger Changes, Synergy Picks Removed, Hallow's EndPosted in: NewsAnyone having troubles since the update?
This is how my collection page looks like
-
5
Leramar89 posted a message on Ben Brode Explains the Reasoning for the Naga Sea Witch Rule ChangePosted in: NewsIt's OK guys cut Team 5 some slack, they're just a small indie company after all. It's not like they're part of a multi-million dollar organisation or anything.
-
2
GhostTrickx1 posted a message on Ben Brode Explains the Reasoning for the Naga Sea Witch Rule ChangePosted in: NewsI understand the points but I disagree with them.
A. Board interactions and hand interactions are not the same thing, so get the Aldor Peacekeeper reasoning out of here.
B. You cards cost 5 is easy to understand. Cards should cost 5. Changing for the sake of making it somehow easier to understand is the dumbest excuse I have ever heard.
C. Bright eyed scout is a battlecry, Naga is an aura. There is no reason the BES should have any effect on how naga works.
-
3
WingR84 posted a message on Ben Brode Explains the Reasoning for the Naga Sea Witch Rule ChangePosted in: NewsPlaying this game since beta... and i find this "confusing" (or should i say... WRONG?).
It says very clear "your cards cost 5".This should mean that a giant cost 5, because if he gets costs lower than 5 (like a 0 mana spell) it SHOULD BE set to 5 again.
I understand that you could say "but the other cards also have rules that you have to add", but for me it is just lazy coding, because the rule is IT COSTS 5.But dont get me wrong.. i get it. For Bright-Eyed Scout i even think that it is somehow correct, because it changes the costs of THE CARD and then the "active change" like the "aura" that a Naga Sea Witch has is... gone? But the Naga Sea Witch is a aura for me that sets the very clear state that ANYTHING costs 5.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2
Great deck, thanks
1
Same problem here, annoying af. Almost impossible to get rid of this 5 gold, played 3 arenas recently, still no luck