Fuck Reno !
- prolibrium
- Registered User
-
Member for 7 years, 4 months, and 24 days
Last active Tue, May, 28 2019 18:16:15 -
- 4
- 7
- 37
- 0 Followers
- 173 Total Posts
- 166 Thanks
-
1
SleepTurtle posted a message on Multiple legendaries per deck = pay to winPosted in: General Discussionagree 50% of the idea. The stupid player will put 20 legendary in deck to win very control match up. They don't care about loses vs aggro. They just open Nerf threads everyday ask blizzard Nerf or move all aggro card to wild. Really stupid.
for example renolock vs Reno lock. They do all the stupid misplay but they win at the end because they put 20 legendary in deck compare to normal Reno lock that only have around 8 legendary.
-
4
Adlerfan posted a message on Multiple legendaries per deck = pay to winPosted in: General DiscussionI wholeheartly disagree to the post owner. As a f2p it simply takes a bit more time to getting all the major cards. In my opinion, Hearthstone is comparatively less pay to win than most other games.
As a noob you simply cannot have the expectation not to pay RL money and directly compete for legend (which you probably couldn´t even if you would spend money). Newcomers just need be content to compete for Rank 15 which should be doable even with an early collection, develop their collection and gradualy advance in rank.
I have spend a very moderate amount of money into the game over the last three years and I own all playable cards of all expansions.
Money or patience. You will be competitive in no game without either.
-
16
czdatka posted a message on Reno JacksonPosted in: Reno JacksonWe are gonna be rich. Aggro is my bitch.
-
2
n3r0s1 posted a message on Group therapy! Need to blow off steam? Mega salty? Here is the place!Posted in: General Discussion4 Common & 1 Rare
seriously that's what I get 99 of 100 packs
-
5
uiasdnmb posted a message on How to deal with Renolock?Posted in: Standard FormatSame way I dealt with Secret pally, I wait for their core cards to rotate out into wild
-
-2
mccoma posted a message on Reno JacksonPosted in: Reno JacksonFrankly i hate this card. 1st hint when the opponent really doesn't really care receive hits until below 10points. then the real game begins, worse when their deck is established.
Really messed up with my aggro mid range - face hunter deck tempo. The chances are 25% will meet such opponent and with 20% winning rate. Worst experience met this card twice in a single game.
Currently contemplating to craft one.
-
4
DoubleP2k posted a message on Reno JacksonPosted in: Reno JacksonAggro was why I left hearthstone for a while. I came back to find reno. I find him to be more toxic. I think the principal of the card was needed, but I don't like this execution, at least not at this point in the game. Maybe the cost of no duplicates was high before, but gadgetzan added an onslaught of viable alternatives to most control spells. I can't say much for renolock, because I didn't see it terribly often, but for reno mage it was tilting more than any experience I have had before. I didn't have to play aggro, in fact I often wasn't, to be tilted by the secret that was well known to be iceblock, knowing that literally no matter what I did he would survive at least two more turns, and be able to clear my board three times over, even if I did have monster cards.
Yes he forced mages to think about their decks a bit more, but I don't think it was right to make him uncounterable, at least for such a strong turn 6 power.
I want them to replace reno, I want this concept to stay, I want no duplicate decks to exist at least until gadgetzan cycles to wild. But I don't want Reno, I am glad that I will only be around for 25% of the time he is in standard.Side note: I find some great irony in that Reno encouraged aggro players to go face somehow even harder, because they had to kill the mages before reno was drawn. Patches is broken AF, but he gives face aggro the chance to not be squashed by an equally tilting deck style.
-
-6
user-29445644 posted a message on Reno JacksonPosted in: Reno JacksonThis card should be a warlock class card only.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2
Firebat didn't play Brann even Auctioneer in his deck last night. He went for Thalnos and another ancient of war
2
Have I told you about my Silverback Patriarch + Oasis Snapjaw tempo priest deck? I mean there's a few people i'm collaborating with who have gotten to around rank 6 or 7 with it. But just because I built a deck doesn't mean I have to be the one to make it go to legend....I'll just leave that to the people who can play 30 matches a day
1
1
OK serious question first: How much did you climb with this?
1
With regard to your multiple legendary = advantage argument, you do realize that aggro shaman, which is the best deck in the game right now, uses at most 1 legendary. Even Pirate warrior with only Patches is viable enough to climb to rank 5. As for new players,
https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/5o5p2o/day_3_on_na_f2p_and_ive_gathered_enough_dust_to/
This guy made a decent pirate warrior deck with patches in 3 days on a new f2p id. Newbies aren't good enough to win in arena? Too bad.
7
Biggest 'fuck you' in the game is when a reno mage sits behind ice block, Reno, Alexsrasza and Manic Soulcaster
2
Secret Hunter is very reliant on having Huntress/Secretkeeper/Cat trick in the first few turns and burns your hand up quickly which is a huge liability when playing against aggro shaman because he can keep flooding the board, whereas if you run out of steam vs reno decks you're just done
1
This is definitely one of the better hunter decks in this meta
1
If I could remove 1 card from the game, it would be ice block