But I would add some hefty caveats: 1) The skill ceiling in BG is (contentiously) a lot lower than other competitive games (like OW or SC2) and instead RNG plays a big part. 2) In BG, you can creep MMR just for playing loads and not sucking, whereas in other competitive games your MMR is entirely based on skill (playtime and skills aren't always correlated.)
Might want to skew everything down 2-3k. I don't recall exactly, but doesn't it start at 4k? There are a lot of people sub 2k, which I think is the "bronze" range.
There is no way to have any sort of consistency at winning with this deck. I wouldn't bother, this is an old Archetype that died when the game became so fast and had easy board removal.
This is a nice looking deck for fun, but will never work.
0
Might want to skew everything down 2-3k. I don't recall exactly, but doesn't it start at 4k? There are a lot of people sub 2k, which I think is the "bronze" range.
2
Isn't Gnomeferatu a trap card? I mean, yes you have a chance at burning a key card. But it's more likely that you'll get them to it sooner.
0
Doctor Boom was THE reason everyone was relieved to hear about the format changes.
3
I agree it's the least desirable pull, but it's a necessary risk for the deck unfortunately. ...imo
0
Can't wait until Paladin can somehow gain access to Rogue or Priest cards. Maybe even Treachery a Hoarding dragon.
0
There is no way to have any sort of consistency at winning with this deck. I wouldn't bother, this is an old Archetype that died when the game became so fast and had easy board removal.
This is a nice looking deck for fun, but will never work.
0
I'm surprised no Spellbreaker
0
I've had a Silver Hand deck in Wild since Wild's inception. It's always been pretty strong and keeps getting better.
0
98.954