Hearthpwn

I'll probably push its mana cost to 7 for mimic's dagger. I was tinkering with its cost for a bit and didn't think it was playable on 7.

Gorehowl is better if you have the life to play it. I actually stole a gorehole from warrior on turn 3 with thought steal and found I was unable to play the card in fear of cthun or gromish. This notion is even more true against aggressive decks such as midrange hunter and ect. This weapon is more appropriate for priest since they lack the ability to stack up on life.

Thunderaan the Windseeker

Though, you can pre-equip the weapon on previous turn(s). E.g stormforged axe on turn 2 -> massive tempo swing on turn 4. You can also combo this card with rockbitter weapon. Wait until turn 5 and then, 6 damage tempo swing. It also combos with spirit claws, so you can use all the weapon charges on a turn where you have spell damage.

The card isn't for aggro shaman. It's orientated towards a control shaman.

Well, I am quitting Hearthstone. The new expansion has pushed Hearthstone pass my tolerable threshold. It should be obvious that the new expansion has increased the power-levels of decks. However, the stronger decks are, the less we can interact with them. Standard is like a mirror of wild (relatively). I am going to go play a real game now -- Dota 2.

http://imgur.com/a/TTADV

Imgur features my reasoning for each card so I've elected to leave everything on there.

Quote from Peteravens05 >>

After playing with this card for a little while, i dont see what the problem is, Ive been about to play a normal game almost all the time. I got Rend against someone playing Cthun and it saved my ass.

I think Bareskin Grizzly is bad by design. Rethinking it, the card can't really be optimally balanced. It can either be nerfed to oblivion or remain as op.  The problem with dealing 1 damage exactly to it 3 times is that it loses you an absurd amount of tempo or resources. E.g tempo mage will have to cast a bunch of spells just to get the pings off. For warrior, you have to have exactly ghoul and execute to get a clean kill. Otherwise, you just have to ignore the card and go face. Only pain deals with it effectively.

I completely missed the inspire synergy with Rifleman.

For survivalist, Cloaked huntress-> Surivalist= almost instant win.

Your new cards are good. Your old ones are either poorly balanced or lacking in innovation.

Bareskin Grizzly is op. Damage less than 3 is rare outside of aoe. Minion or removal generally deal an upwards of 3 damage. This card can easily have an equivalent of 9 or more health. Not to mention, decks with buffs can break this card. You need 3 attacks to kill it which makes it a likely minion to survive for buffs. I would probably make it 3 mana 3/2 or a 4 mana 4/2 both a beast tag.

Top Deck Killer is shit. Its effect just isn't a detriment to the opponent most of the time. It should be a 5/4 or 4/5.

Moonkin form is unplayable trash. In the best case scenario, you play it with aoe and you get a bit of value. Though, that isn't enough to warrant playing this card. The card should read "Change your hero power to 'passively grant +1 spell damage'" or "Make your hero power +1 attack +1 spell damage +1 armour" . Whether they stack or not is left for your discretion.

Greenleaf archer is trash. If you play it early-mid, you will almost always lose 2 cards. If you play it late, the mana advantage isn't as significant. I don't see a way of fixing this card.

Repeating rifleman is bad by design. It's better just to play an animal companion or bow or w/e which will pretty much deal similar amounts of damage. The card is basically only good if you are able to play it on exactly 3 and your opponent has nothing.

Survivalist seems too strong. It shouldn't give attack.

Was going to compliment your BlackHeart card but it seems you changed it. I think the old version was both players discard. I preferred that.

Shouldn't matter because the OP is at high legend.

They will generally save their brawl for your Call of the Wild anyway so that extra minion just dies to brawl.

I completely forget what I post? Maybe that would be because you followed up my suggestion that you were playing Priest in the 4 digits with a rank 6 screenshot and an insinuation that you're better than me because you got this (apparently in September 2014, 2 years ago).

What? An excuse?

The highest rank I've achieved after standard was released, which seems to be the most relevant, was rank 99 legend. That occurred late in the season of the second month of the Old Gods release.

So this last claim of yours that I "have a lot of pride surrounding this video game" just completely backfired, but not only that, you were the one who started going on about how good you are and thus made this about something else.

Its not even funny when I'm obviously in the higher ground here. I study Physics I don't work at Mcdonalds.

 You do realize I can see how this is a lie just by googling it? Top 100 are made public and easy to find. All I could find on sadpwner was a top 100 from September 2014 and not a rank 6, but 13. 

Completely forgets what he originally posts. Your credibility levels are off the charts.

If you even knew what you were talking about you would link me a top 100 finish instead. I rest my case, you "buffoon".

I obviously wouldn't remember an exact rank from that long ago.

 

I would be impressed with that but then again, that wasn't the point. You have successfully proven that you were playing well in September 2014. Congrats kiddo.

And yea, I can tell you're just a kid by calling on hypocrisy when my claims were perfectly justified and there were no contradictions in them. No reason to argue with an immature soul.

So you just proved my point, that you were in fact playing priest in the 4 digits, by keeping quiet about it

Keeping quiet about what? You never asked anything of me. You also completely forgot that my original post, to which you replied, held my reasoning for why I thought Priest was strong.

and instead trying to prove that you're any good by arguing that you were 6 at some point, which is funny because every good player knows that rank 6 means nothing if it was attained,

Quite hilarious how you instigated this discussion by pointing out my rank and now, you turn around and claim the trivialness of my rank. Teach me hypocrisy101.

say, in the first week of a ranked play season. If you even knew what you were talking about you would link me a top 100 finish instead. I rest my case, you "buffoon".

>Falsely assuming that my rank was obtained early in the season when it was in fact, the last day of the season when I took the screenshot.

No one takes a screenshot of the same rank twice.

Quote from TalariaEU >>

Quote from plebcrusher >>

I recently made a priest deck and well, priest is absurdly powerful. People were wrong. The large reason is that it counters the most popular deck currently - hunter. Priest isn't also a niche tech deck any more. It can counter aggro and has a great chance at beating late game decks as well.

P.s I was playing at legend.

I'm sure you were, in the 4 digits.

Oh, the bliss of malchezaar imp. It is everything I had hoped for,

I recently made a priest deck and well, priest is absurdly powerful. People were wrong. The large reason is that it counters the most popular deck currently - hunter. Priest isn't also a niche tech deck any more. It can counter aggro and has a great chance at beating late game decks as well.

P.s I was playing at legend.

Today, the community learned why 80% of players reside below rank 18.