Hearthpwn

Quote from viczone >>

Quote from dhlow >>

Quote from viczone >>

Quote from Yandai >>

I still dont get why Val'anyr is in every Aggro Paladin's Decklist.

 It's at least 8 dmg to face (or it can clear some annoying stuff), buffs a minion (for example, a 5/3 divine shield + taunt for 1 mana is "OK") with the potential for even more face damage.

 While this is true, another rallying blade is more face damage per mana cost in shorter time span. I don't like this weapon in an aggro list, where your goal is to go for face. Against control decks that manage to fend off your aggression it doesn't make big enough difference. Against other aggro deck that gets an early lead on board when you get this in mulligan it just loses you the game more likely than helps.

 While this is also true, I have been in many sutiations where Rallying Blade with its attack of 3 simply wouldn't be enough to kill the opponent fast enough. There is a significant difference between a 3 and a 4 attack weapon. That said, I would prefer both Blades AND a Val'anyr in my list.

Quote from viczone >>

Quote from dhlow >>

Quote from viczone >>

Quote from Yandai >>

I still dont get why Val'anyr is in every Aggro Paladin's Decklist.

 It's at least 8 dmg to face (or it can clear some annoying stuff), buffs a minion (for example, a 5/3 divine shield + taunt for 1 mana is "OK") with the potential for even more face damage.

 While this is true, another rallying blade is more face damage per mana cost in shorter time span. I don't like this weapon in an aggro list, where your goal is to go for face. Against control decks that manage to fend off your aggression it doesn't make big enough difference. Against other aggro deck that gets an early lead on board when you get this in mulligan it just loses you the game more likely than helps.

 While this is also true, I have been in many sutiations where Rallying Blade with its attack of 3 simply wouldn't be enough to kill the opponent fast enough. There is a significant difference between a 3 and a 4 attack weapon. That said, I would prefer both Blades AND a Val'anyr in my list.

Quote from viczone >>

Quote from dhlow >>

Quote from viczone >>

Quote from Yandai >>

I still dont get why Val'anyr is in every Aggro Paladin's Decklist.

 It's at least 8 dmg to face (or it can clear some annoying stuff), buffs a minion (for example, a 5/3 divine shield + taunt for 1 mana is "OK") with the potential for even more face damage.

 While this is true, another rallying blade is more face damage per mana cost in shorter time span. I don't like this weapon in an aggro list, where your goal is to go for face. Against control decks that manage to fend off your aggression it doesn't make big enough difference. Against other aggro deck that gets an early lead on board when you get this in mulligan it just loses you the game more likely than helps.

 While this is also true, I have been in many sutiations where Rallying Blade with its attack of 3 simply wouldn't be enough to kill the opponent fast enough. There is a significant difference between a 3 and a 4 attack weapon. That said, I would prefer both Blades AND a Val'anyr in my list.

Using uther instead of lich king for on demand burst. Deck is excelent, apsolutelly crushes all types of druid. Easy rank 5. Board clear is not neccessary as your oponent will tremble when he sees your skelemancers

Omg ... THIS WORKS 

Quote from Rhaegar12345 >>

Spellbreaker, equality, pyro, nerubian, eater have to go. Spikeridge,  stonehill, vinecleaver, consecration, deathwing, ... seem like better choices. Deck needs a better start, it can't compete with shaman and aggro druid I think.

Quote from DaimonJM >>

2 Eater of Secrets... really ? Midrange Paladin is already favored against Mage. Basically a "win more" card.

I'm not sure about Blood Knight either... It weakens your board and begs for hard removal. I see it more as a tech card.

 

 

Basically I have an idea of a deck that would counter most powerfull plays of other decks while alone having an option to brake them in mid game using Divine shield synergies. Tell me what you gust think.

In a token druid i can see this card as a alternative mid game finisher. If you can put few small minions to keep it at high health, then use cards like Kooky Chemist to set up good trades or simply go face for 6 maybe 7 or 8 damage. This card actually has potential.

Looking at released cards I am more and more convinced that double Stampeding Kodo will be a staple in my deck.  It counters most classes very valuable cards and in agressive deck it can be just the swing you need to finish the game off. 

Right along side this i wold put Spellbreaker since it counters a lot of new  coming cards with multiple effect. 

Quote from Odin1Eye >>

Quote from pastatore >>

What are [card]Stormwind Knight[/card] and  [card]Raging Worgen[/card] suppose to do ?

 Raging Worgen was an accident - replace him with your Favorite(tm) Windfury minion.

Stormwind Knight is another Charge minion, he's better at trading than your other charge minions.

With his decklist I would even concider that 1 drop dragonhawk. That is if he intends to buff it up 

I used blood knight in agro paladin back in gvg ... Turn 1 squire, turn 2 bot, turn 3 into 9/9 BK. Faceroll

Turn 3 draw a Tyrion concept doesn't sound good to me.  Next to many better three drops that immediately oppose agro, this will not be as viable as many might think

Ok just one maybe stupid question.. If that Corpsetaker also gains windfury isnt it worth putting at least one windfury minnion in your deck ?

What are [card]Stormwind Knight[/card] and  [card]Raging Worgen[/card] suppose to do ?

Oh yea allmost forgot primordial glyph is broken and shadow visions also.