Comparing valve/steam to blizzard/battle.net doesn't really make sense imo. Steam is a marketplace that is a way for developers to sell games, communities to be made, and for other goods to be sold, while battle.net is just for blizzard games, there are no third party people involved.
The difference is, is steam is a gaming platform that many different companies are a part off, it wouldn't make sense for it to be called valve. Battle.net is only for blizzard games, it's just not needed for there to be a distinction between the 2.
babbling book is just bad why would u want a random spell when you could just put a good sell into your deck? (1/1 body isn't worth anyway, and the chance to get say another fireball or something is very small)
Karaazhan(with POTENTIAL, can't say a card will see play when it's not even in the game)- Moonglade Portal (very hard to say it seems bad but healing is very weak in druid so could make it in if there is space for it), Menagerie Warden and Enchanted Raven [/card](maybe if a beast druid works but don't bank on it), [card]Kindly Grandmother (probably in midrange hunter if the meta is slow), Nightbane templar (ONLY if dragon paladin is a thing), Fool's Bane, The Curator (maybe), Barnes (probably), Moat Lurker (maybe to slow but has potential in some n'zoth decks), Netherspite Historian (pretty good chance), and Book Wyrm (also needs probably a dragon paladin deck to work out) Edit: and Medivh, the Guardian12 cards with POTENTIAL, they will definitely not all see play, chances are most won't see play....
TLDR definitely think that Naxx had way more playable cards compared to Karazhan, and in my opinion, people should wait before getting it to see how many cards actually see play, probably will be much less than Naxx
I'm going to wait because chances are none of these cards will affect the meta drastically. Some have potential, but none are definite to be good competitive cards which aren't worth 2800 of my gold if all the cards are going to be useless. If Barnes and some other cards end up being good and playable then I'll get it, if not then I won't.
not really maybe like .1% and then like .5% from constructed the main reason is brawls get boring after a few days so they may start getting long Qs if a bad brawl is there for a week.
.... u realize they spend weeks making a new tavern brawl not just a day.... It's more a psychological trick to make it seems more limited and special, not just a constant thing like arena and constructed.
Beating Legend players? No, you only deserve stars for winning and getting extra stars will easily be abused(when in legend you can't be demoted so people may just throw games)/isn't competitively fair.
Win streaks? No, the only reason they are in the game is so skilled plays who should be at the top and get their faster having them above rank 5 would make it so people that get some lucky wins may get legend when really they aren't that great and shouldn't be there.
Or how he said, let us give them a deck or something. Give "advanced" players a reason to battle the Innkeeper again
heroic adventures..... thats kinda their point. Anyway this is a multiplayer card game, playing against innkeeper is like playing against bots in league and csgo they are only made for really new players.
2
Comparing valve/steam to blizzard/battle.net doesn't really make sense imo. Steam is a marketplace that is a way for developers to sell games, communities to be made, and for other goods to be sold, while battle.net is just for blizzard games, there are no third party people involved.
-4
Agreed I don't see the point of having another brand when it doesn't have a purpose.
4
The difference is, is steam is a gaming platform that many different companies are a part off, it wouldn't make sense for it to be called valve. Battle.net is only for blizzard games, it's just not needed for there to be a distinction between the 2.
0
agreed, there are some cards with POTENTIAl, but must won't see play and even those that may have a good chance of not seeing play.
0
babbling book is just bad why would u want a random spell when you could just put a good sell into your deck? (1/1 body isn't worth anyway, and the chance to get say another fireball or something is very small)
1
0
I'm going to wait because chances are none of these cards will affect the meta drastically. Some have potential, but none are definite to be good competitive cards which aren't worth 2800 of my gold if all the cards are going to be useless. If Barnes and some other cards end up being good and playable then I'll get it, if not then I won't.
0
not really maybe like .1% and then like .5% from constructed the main reason is brawls get boring after a few days so they may start getting long Qs if a bad brawl is there for a week.
0
move the EXE back to where it was and make a shortcut to put on your desktop\
Making shortcut: right click the EXE, click "CREATE shortcut", and move that to your desktop
0
2
.... u realize they spend weeks making a new tavern brawl not just a day.... It's more a psychological trick to make it seems more limited and special, not just a constant thing like arena and constructed.
5
how long does it take you to poop? just play your turn fast, dont end turn, and run like Usain Bolt to the shit hole
0
Beating Legend players? No, you only deserve stars for winning and getting extra stars will easily be abused(when in legend you can't be demoted so people may just throw games)/isn't competitively fair.
Win streaks? No, the only reason they are in the game is so skilled plays who should be at the top and get their faster having them above rank 5 would make it so people that get some lucky wins may get legend when really they aren't that great and shouldn't be there.
0
Yep definitely a bug even went back and found the video were they said it isn't suppose to happen.
0