• 2

    posted a message on Blizzard Moving Away from Battle.net Branding

    Comparing valve/steam to blizzard/battle.net doesn't really make sense imo. Steam is a marketplace that is a way for developers to sell games, communities to be made, and for other goods to be sold, while battle.net is just for blizzard games, there are no third party people involved.

    Posted in: News
  • -4

    posted a message on Blizzard Moving Away from Battle.net Branding

    Agreed I don't see the point of having another brand when it doesn't have a purpose.

    Posted in: News
  • 4

    posted a message on Blizzard Moving Away from Battle.net Branding

    The difference is, is steam is a gaming platform that many different companies are a part off, it wouldn't make sense for it to be called valve. Battle.net is only for blizzard games, it's just not needed for there to be a distinction between the 2.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Karazhan - is it really worth to buy? Your Opinions

    agreed, there are some cards with POTENTIAl, but must won't see play and even those that may have a good chance of not seeing play.

    Posted in: Adventures
  • 0

    posted a message on Karazhan - is it really worth to buy? Your Opinions

    babbling book is just bad why would u want a random spell when you could just put a good sell into your deck? (1/1 body isn't worth anyway, and the chance to get say another fireball or something is very small)

    Posted in: Adventures
  • 1

    posted a message on Karazhan - is it really worth to buy? Your Opinions
    Quote from Indomitos >>

    Karazhan has more playable cards than Naxx its definetly worth the money at least in this point of view.

     u sure? It's not smart to compare potential playable cards to historically playable cards, but let us do it anyway.
    Naxx(cards that saw play)- Duplicate, Avenge, Dark Cultist (kinda), Voidcaller, Death's Bite, Webspinner (a little not much), Loatheb (nothing in Karazhan even compares), Shade of Naxxramas, Deathlord, Nerubian Egg, Haunted Creeper, Sludge Belcher, Mad Scientist, Unstable Ghoul (small amount in patron before nerf), Undertaker (isn't played but was meta defining on release before nerf), and Zombie Chow (op op)         16 in total or 14 if you dont want to count unstable and undertaker
     
    Karaazhan(with POTENTIAL, can't say a card will see play when it's not even in the game)- Moonglade Portal (very hard to say it seems bad but healing is very weak in druid so could make it in if there is space for it), Menagerie Warden and Enchanted Raven [/card](maybe if a beast druid works but don't bank on it), [card]Kindly Grandmother (probably in midrange hunter if the meta is slow), Nightbane templar (ONLY if dragon paladin is a thing), Fool's Bane, The Curator (maybe), Barnes (probably), Moat Lurker (maybe to slow but has potential in some n'zoth decks), Netherspite Historian (pretty good chance), and Book Wyrm (also needs probably a dragon paladin deck to work out) Edit: and Medivh, the Guardian       12 cards with POTENTIAL, they will definitely not all see play, chances are most won't see play....
    TLDR definitely think that Naxx had way more playable cards compared to Karazhan, and in my opinion, people should wait before getting it to see how many cards actually see play, probably will be much less than Naxx
    Posted in: Adventures
  • 0

    posted a message on Karazhan - is it really worth to buy? Your Opinions

    I'm going to wait because chances are none of these cards will affect the meta drastically. Some have potential, but none are definite to be good competitive cards which aren't worth 2800 of my gold if all the cards are going to be useless. If Barnes and some other cards end up being good and playable then I'll get it, if not then I won't.

    Posted in: Adventures
  • 0

    posted a message on Why isn't tavern brawl available 24/7?

    not really maybe like .1% and then like .5% from constructed the main reason is brawls get boring after a few days so they may start getting long Qs if a bad brawl is there for a week.

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • 0

    posted a message on Bit of a technical question: Decktracker

    move the EXE back to where it was and make a shortcut to put on your desktop\

    Making shortcut: right click the EXE, click "CREATE shortcut", and move that to your desktop

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on F2P Legends? show yourselves!

     

    Quote from plebcrusher >>
    Quote from Coagulant >>

    fyi, if everyone was f2p there would be no hearthstone

     not really, Hearthstone could operate off a donation system.
     has that ever worked
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Why isn't tavern brawl available 24/7?

    .... u realize they spend weeks making a new tavern brawl not just a day.... It's more a psychological trick to make it seems more limited and special, not just a constant thing like arena and constructed.

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • 5

    posted a message on What you do when the poop hits?

    how long does it take you to poop? just play your turn fast, dont end turn, and run like Usain Bolt to the shit hole

    Posted in: General Chat
  • 0

    posted a message on Bonus stars rank 5+

    Beating Legend players? No, you only deserve stars for winning and getting extra stars will easily be abused(when in legend you can't be demoted so people may just throw games)/isn't competitively fair.

    Win streaks? No, the only reason they are in the game is so skilled plays who should be at the top and get their faster having them above rank 5 would make it so people that get some lucky wins may get legend when really they aren't that great and shouldn't be there.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Discover bug with Staghelm

    Yep definitely a bug even went back and found the video were they said it isn't suppose to happen.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Innkeeper Battles
    Quote from JohnDoe12074 >>

    Or how he said, let us give them a deck or something. Give "advanced" players a reason to battle the Innkeeper again

    heroic adventures..... thats kinda their point. Anyway this is a multiplayer card game, playing against innkeeper is like playing against bots in league and csgo they are only made for really new players.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.