• 0

    posted a message on What if all cards were unlocked for 3 days after an expansion
    Quote from EternalHS >>

    Lack of collection is not what is preventing players from experimenting. 

     I think you'd be surprised. Sure, there are some players who wouldn't take advantage of it, but there are a whole lot of people who would. I would like to experiment more with stupid decks, but I already spend way too much dust on noncompetitive meme decks as it is.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Why do you play KIngsbane Rogue?

    I've played Kingsbane on and off since it came out. I find the deck really fun to play, and I enjoy playing decks that are difficult to play when you have a bad hand. I can understand why people don't want to play against it, and I feel bad for those people, but I play the game for my enjoyment, not for my opponent's enjoyment. There are decks that I don't enjoy playing against, but as long as they enjoy playing them there's not much i can do either.

    Posted in: Rogue
  • 2

    posted a message on RR dead on arrival, but there’s hope
    Quote from Velerios >>

    "It's better that it's weak, next year the game will be in a much better place"

    Sorry, but making a weak set is in general stupid

    A weak expansion might be better in an surrealistic picture that a general low power level is better for the game in a grand picture, but in reality it isn't.

     A weak powerlevel or high powerlevel overall is not bad for the game, but making only a limited amount of cards that are a high powerlevel and the rest are lower powerlevel is a problem.  If the divide in powerlevel between the good cards in a deck and the bad cards in a deck is too large then the game will be much more draw dependent and that's not good.

    You need to find the right balance and try to aim for that balance with all sets. If one goes way over that balance you should continue to focus on your previously defined balance and wait for that set to rotate.  Just trying to one-up every expansion with new expansions is a way to ruin a game pretty quickly.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on RR dead on arrival, but there’s hope
    Quote from Ronninji >>

    Why do people keep saying this ? Ive been playing against the same decks 1 hour into every expansion and the last day of new exspansion.

    Not sure if people havent noticed that HS team more or less makes every deck for us, you can see what fits togheter amile away.

    Its called money machine, so people need to craft lots of cards to play those  specific decks.

     

     Lots of decks weren't premade and weren't found on the first day of the expansion. Lots of decks are obvious, but certainly not all of them.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Let us buy Wild Packs with gold please
    Quote from allanime01 >>

    Never happening, blizzard foresaw the fact that wild would eventually grow to be a format that would at least be formidable as an option and in preparation for that they wanted to make sure that anyone who wanted to sustain themselves and wild has to pay actual money. Because whether it's blizzard, riot, or any other game company you can think of apparently it doesn't matter how good your game is or how accessible it can be, all that matters is how much money you can literally squeezed from every single person even if it makes the game unfair for those who can't put it in. :)

     Considering that 99% of wild players are better off just crafting the wild only cards they need instead of buying packs I don't think making money off of wild is their main concern.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Nerf Speculation: Animal Companion (Have a Poll)

    The card is class specific and random, so all outcomes should be slightly OP to account for that. I don't think the card needs a nerf at this time.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What do you propose of a change on Shudderwock?
    Quote from Wonderbuster >>

     

    Those of you who want to downplay this eyesore forget that we are stuck for at least April 2020 with this card, and replacements for Zola the Gorgon, Grumble and Saronite Chain Gang are somewhere down the pipeline to compliment this card.

     How do you know this?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on When Rogue Will Get A Broken Card?
    Quote from hillandder >>
    Quote from maroon5five >>

    There's no reason to continue this thread. Rogue has had plenty of broken cards as numerous people have pointed out. Any card that was nerfed or HoF'ed arguably was broken because you only fix what is broken. Rogue has had several cards nerfed, some multiple times.

     From expansions (not the classic set) the only class rogue card nerfed was the quest and that card is not OP.

    Polarized cards don't are the same of OP cards.

    OP cards are broken vs any kind of deck, polarized cards are broken vs something but terrible vs another thing.

     Polarizing cards can definitively be OP. They are not mutually exlclusive. OP cards are not broken vs any kind of deck, OP cards are cards that are above the general max power level, hence why they are called OP (overpowered). Which OP cards are you thinking of that are good against any deck? Pretty much every card in the game is not good against one deck or another.

    Posted in: Rogue
  • 0

    posted a message on When Rogue Will Get A Broken Card?

    There's no reason to continue this thread. Rogue has had plenty of broken cards as numerous people have pointed out. Any card that was nerfed or HoF'ed arguably was broken because you only fix what is broken. Rogue has had several cards nerfed, some multiple times.

    Posted in: Rogue
  • 0

    posted a message on Aggro decks
    Quote from OverholtNA >>
    Quote from EmoGit >>

    If you're just asking for a random aggro deck to climb with, go play league of legends or fortnite or something. We don't need more cancer on the ladder

     We don't need more cancer on ladder, which is why we should all be encouraging aggro players so that we can drive Shudderwock and Kingsbane out of the meta.

     Shudderwock and Kingsbane are already out of the meta as far as I can tell. I rarely see either of them.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is Hearthstone Broken Enough?
    Quote from ColinthePyro >>

    It feels like the only decks you can play and expect to compete with are combo decks, infinite value control decks, or hyper-aggro burn. 

    " It feels like the only decks you can play and expect to compete with are ...(goes to list all deck types except midrange and tempo, and both of them are competitive as well right now so should also be listed)."

    You should wait until everything is settled before passing judgement. Right now there is at least one deck of each type with around a 60+% winrate on hsreplay.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Expansions on Hearthpwn

    You can't please everyone. There will always be unhappy people no matter what you do. I just ignore the whiners as much as I can.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is discard warlock viable?

    Yes, discard warlock is playable. I don't think it is top tier, but it is definitely good enough to rank up with.

    Posted in: Warlock
  • 0

    posted a message on Should Malygos be HOF'ed?
    Quote from ButtSeriously >>

    Malygos himself isn't the problem, the problem is all of the stall cards. Even if he doesn't get hall of famed, he will become severely worse when things like Spreading Plague finally leave.

     There will always be new stall cards. Malygos is the only constant. He wont get worse. He does exactly what hes always done. The tools might change, but there will always be a Malygos OTK deck in one form or another.

     Malygos is very meta dependent and does get worse. There will not always be a Malygos OTK deck, at least not in the top tiers. For long stretches in Hearthstone's history Malygos was only seen in fringe tier 4 decks that you could go months without seeing on ladder.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Should Malygos be HOF'ed?

    Ragnaros wasn't HOF'ed just because he had a big impact on the game. He was HOF'ed because he had a big impact, could be played in lots of different decks, and his effect randomly decided too many games. Malygos doesn't fit well in decks that are not build around him, and his effect isn't random, so he's a completely different class of card than Ragnaros was.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.