• 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag: ma3ud#2558
    Region: EU
    Trade Only?: Yes, you go first

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag: ma3ud#2558

    Region: EU

    Trade Only?: Yes, you go first.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag : ma3ud#2558

    Region : EU

    Trade Only? : Yes, you go first.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 11

    posted a message on [s47 Rank 5] ma3ud Demon Zoolock

    hey, not really. this version is fast and guldan is slow. rin can't be used in a zoodeck. i recommend you to keep the deck as it is.

    also i think you need to gain better informations about archtypes. the fact that you are suggesting rin tells me you are new to the game and are not familiar to different archtypes of hearthstone and how they work.

    here you can learn about different and popular archtypes, how they work and what are the strength and weakness of them:

    https://tempostorm.com/hearthstone/meta-snapshot/standard/2018-02-15

    just make sure to click on view deck to see the archtype explanation.

    Posted in: [s47 Rank 5] ma3ud Demon Zoolock
  • 0

    posted a message on [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock

    abusive is better vs murloc paladin, aggro druid, secret mage, it allows you much better trade in early game, while Acherus Veteran is better vs control and slow decks since it gives permanent +1 and a 2/1 body. i changed Acherus Veteran to abusive cause i faced alot of murlocs, and it helped a lot to manage the early board. you can switch back to Acherus Veteran if you are facing more control decks.

    however i highly recommend you demon version now:

    https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1036357-s47-rank-5-ma3ud-demon-zoolock

    Posted in: [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock
  • 3

    posted a message on [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock

    It's too slow for the current meta, i highly recommend you below version(much faster and stronger for the current meta):

    https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1036357-s47-rank-5-ma3ud-demon-zoolock

    Posted in: [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock
  • 12

    posted a message on Adjust Fireball already

    There is noting wrong with fireballs. and your logic that it should be nerfed cuz it can kill most of 5-6 mana minions with 4 mana doesn't make sense, polymorph can kill a 12/12 with 4 mana, so it should be nerfed?

    also overload 2 is ok, cuz 3 mana will leave u alot of mana to actually kill sth and put sth on board too. that means controling the board.

    i think u have lost a lot of games to tempo secret mage, the problem with that deck is playing free secrets not having fireballs. mage secrets are too powerfull to be played at turn 1 with kabal lacky, or a free secret at turn 3 plus a 4/3 body.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on [s47 Rank 5] ma3ud Demon Zoolock

    in this version we don't have much late games, so you may find ur self empty handed so fast, specially when you don't have the imp.

    my suggestion is to try argent squires, it has better survivablity, and be really careful when u r using doomguard. only use it when u can have lethal this turn or next, or when it is needed to protect the board.

    the good thing about imp was u could use it with discard mechanic to get rid of a bad hand and having the chance of getteing the cards you want. and also it could be used with doomguard to put more pressure on board without emptying ur hand.

    btw u should buy the karazhan with coins before you lose the chance, it's 4 legendary for 2800 coins, which you can't get that much legendary with spending the same coins on packs.

    Posted in: [s47 Rank 5] ma3ud Demon Zoolock
  • 2

    posted a message on [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock

    I have created a new version which i hit rank 5 with:

    https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1036357-s47-rank-5-ma3ud-demon-zoolock

    Posted in: [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock
  • 2

    posted a message on [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock

    i'm currently experimenting different version of zoolock, i think i can get a really viable version in a few days.

    currently i have changed a lot of cards and still trying some cards, so check out in a few days or follow me so you get notified when i created a new one.

    Posted in: [s46 93% Rank 5] ma3ud Prince Zoolock
  • 1

    posted a message on Non-Warlock nerfs that should have also happened
    Quote from HyperNova >>
    Quote from Nashrow >>

    Im ok with that Cards. Nerf Voidlords and warlock survivability. Thanks.

     Explain to me how Voidlord by itself as a 9 mana card  is a problem card?
    Oh here’s the challenge, in your explanation dont use the cards Skull of Manari, Possessed Lackey, Bloodreaver Gul’dan or any Card with copy effects.
    And I think you will then discover Voidlord is not the problem card. But the cheap ways to cheat out big demons (or big cards in general) that’s the problem.
     and I have a challenge for you. take out two voidlord and then tell me how Skull of Manari, Possessed Lackey, Bloodreaver Gul’dan can save you?
    also i don't think  Skull of Manari, Possessed Lackey, Bloodreaver Gul’dan  are cheating. 
    with skull of manari you are losing an entire turn to play, also it can be destroyed by your opponent.
    Bloodreaver Gul’dan is 10 mana and like most of the dk's it's affect needs to be powerful.
    Possessed Lackey has bad stats and it requires you to only have some specific cards in your deck and you need to draw it before drawing your other demons.. 
    the problem are mostly with dark pact, it's 16 health + deathrattle activator which is so strong, also void lord is a problematic card. it is like the freezer mechanic for mage, it stops the game and requires all decks to run 2x silence. without running the silence even the 9 mana is problematic you can get them back with dk, n'zoth.
    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Username / Nickname Change Request Thread

    Hi, could you change my name to ma3ud? thanx.

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • 1

    posted a message on Is it worth to craft Cubelock?

    never ever spend that much on any deck, it's not good to spend that much. wait till you get more pieces, decks can be easily ruined with rotation, nerfs, meta changes and you will regret spending 5k dust, consider playing other decks for now.

    and it will never be a completely control warlock meta, there are so many counters to that if it gets a lot of popularity and aggro decks stay away for a while, mill rogue is the real winner hear, also tempo mage can win warlocks pretty consistently.

    my suggestion is to play another deck, sth cheaper, just think about warlock doesn't stay as tier 1, then Skull of the Man'ari and Prince Taldaram will be useless cards that can't be used any where else. also i think there is already a lot of lists without those 2 legendaries.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Spiteful Priest after the nerf

    i don't think you need to replace Bonemare at all, it's still so good, actually Spiteful Priest will be a lot better now with aggro decks losing there tempo play.

    replacing Corridor Creeper shouldn't be hard too, because you are not playing an aggro or tempo deck. i have been playing Spiteful Priest without Corridor Creeper .maybe you can add the second Twilight Drake and The Lich King or another Faerie Dragon. i don't have your list but any of those 3 cards should be ok.

    Posted in: Priest
  • 1

    posted a message on To those wanting warlock nerfs

    i think we need a compiler to understand what you are talking about :)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.