why is this even on the frontpage? this deck is neither creative nor good. Just a bunch of dragons and handbuff stuff. Even the inbuilt deckbuilder can create better decks than this.
Most aggro-deck so far threatened to kill you around turn 5... so i dont think this will change. I think its just to slow and doesn't offers much protection against aggressive decks. The will just attack your face after you played it and you are half HP again... Anyway i hope it will work out. I dream of dragon-heal-paladin since blackrock:D
I think the problem are the number of different OTK decks and some of them dont even need 10 mana to kill you. I remember blizzard saying that OTK is unfun to play against and that they wanted less OTK decks with lower powerlevel to be around. Also mojomaster is a legendary and not everyone can invest 1600 dust for a techcard.
i dont play wild nowadays because i dusted all my wild cards for more decks in standard but i remember the spellhunter or bigpriest with barnes. The problem in my point of view is that the card has such a high snowball-potential an can archive an instawin if lucky and that feels really bad and unsatisfying. Obvious luck plays an important role in HS but playing shouldnt feel like flipping a coin.
you cant play living mana and treespeaker on turn 10 because living mana fills up your board. Even if it would work its way worse than dragoncaller alanna because you loose most of you mana crystals.
sorry but i disagree.The reasons why i think this card is bad are:
1. The treant-cards are just to bad to put them in your deck/there are no good treant cards. The only 2 which are 2 ok are Soul of the Forest and Landscaping. Living Mana is also ok but has anti-synergy with Treespeaker.
2. The setup for this card to have value is to specific. you need to have at least 2 treants for this card to be ok and 3 for it to be good. but there are not that many early-game treant you can play and which stick on the board. Also playing this alongside 2 treants on turn 9 is weak
3. You dont want to build a bad deck. Most of the treant cards are bad and you dont want to include them in your deck just to play a bunch of 5/5. Egg hunter is way better in this regard and has better synergies. Also the wincondition is not not good enough to win. you will loose against most tempo decks and all control decks which can kill 3 5/5s
The only way i see this card beeing played(but not really) is in token-druid with Soul of the Forest and i'm not convinced if its worth to put it in your deck for this combo. If you have wisps with deathrattle the game is won most of the time (double Savage Roar or Branching Paths )
Edit: the reason whylevel up is good is because of your heropower in odd-paladin. Druid has no way to spam so early in the game treants.
i hate playing casual so much. I just wanted to finish my quest but some idiot ropes me every turn although i played homebrewed elemental shaman. Then i had leathal but didnt go for it because i wanted to finish my quest. It was so obvious that i had to do a quest but he emoted me and finished me with a inner fire combo. WOW. JUST WOW. I HOPE YOU HAVE A VERY BAD DAY AND BREAKS BOTH OF YOUR ARMS SO YOU CANT PLAY HEARTHSTONE ANYMORE FAKKING IDIOT
Im not very convinced in cutting the bow. For me its one of the best cards in the deck. it helps to control the board or push dmg and gives good amount of value if you can get just 1-2 charges more on it.
I dont understand the problem. Druid is strong but not oppressive. Paladin is just the weakest class atm and its only viable deck (odd pala) gets also countered by druid. I play a lot of control warlock to counter all the otk and zoo decks.I think the meta is in a good place right now. I guess some people are just never satisfied. The only thing i would criticize is that the powerlevel of certain cards is too high and leads to totally one-sided games. See rogue quest, Hunter Dk , Baku etc.
-2
why is this even on the frontpage? this deck is neither creative nor good. Just a bunch of dragons and handbuff stuff. Even the inbuilt deckbuilder can create better decks than this.
0
Most aggro-deck so far threatened to kill you around turn 5... so i dont think this will change. I think its just to slow and doesn't offers much protection against aggressive decks. The will just attack your face after you played it and you are half HP again... Anyway i hope it will work out. I dream of dragon-heal-paladin since blackrock:D
2
Burn-decks are also aggro decks. Tempo-mage is a burn deck and it kills you usually way before turn 10
0
its a rogue deck. i replaced Deranged Doctor with bloodmage
AAECAYO6AgTtBfH7Atf+AqCAAw2bBdQF7gaGCdvjArHuAsXzAt76Aqr/AtGBA7OFA86MA9WMAwA=
0
I play a pirate mechthun deck. Firebat made a very good list on the omnistone channel. Its pretty decent for a meme deck
0
I think the problem are the number of different OTK decks and some of them dont even need 10 mana to kill you. I remember blizzard saying that OTK is unfun to play against and that they wanted less OTK decks with lower powerlevel to be around. Also mojomaster is a legendary and not everyone can invest 1600 dust for a techcard.
2
i dont play wild nowadays because i dusted all my wild cards for more decks in standard but i remember the spellhunter or bigpriest with barnes. The problem in my point of view is that the card has such a high snowball-potential an can archive an instawin if lucky and that feels really bad and unsatisfying. Obvious luck plays an important role in HS but playing shouldnt feel like flipping a coin.
0
.
0
you cant play living mana and treespeaker on turn 10 because living mana fills up your board. Even if it would work its way worse than dragoncaller alanna because you loose most of you mana crystals.
1
sorry but i disagree.The reasons why i think this card is bad are:
1. The treant-cards are just to bad to put them in your deck/there are no good treant cards. The only 2 which are 2 ok are Soul of the Forest and Landscaping. Living Mana is also ok but has anti-synergy with Treespeaker.
2. The setup for this card to have value is to specific. you need to have at least 2 treants for this card to be ok and 3 for it to be good. but there are not that many early-game treant you can play and which stick on the board. Also playing this alongside 2 treants on turn 9 is weak
3. You dont want to build a bad deck. Most of the treant cards are bad and you dont want to include them in your deck just to play a bunch of 5/5. Egg hunter is way better in this regard and has better synergies. Also the wincondition is not not good enough to win. you will loose against most tempo decks and all control decks which can kill 3 5/5s
The only way i see this card beeing played(but not really) is in token-druid with Soul of the Forest and i'm not convinced if its worth to put it in your deck for this combo. If you have wisps with deathrattle the game is won most of the time (double Savage Roar or Branching Paths )
Edit: the reason whylevel up is good is because of your heropower in odd-paladin. Druid has no way to spam so early in the game treants.
2
i hate playing casual so much. I just wanted to finish my quest but some idiot ropes me every turn although i played homebrewed elemental shaman. Then i had leathal but didnt go for it because i wanted to finish my quest. It was so obvious that i had to do a quest but he emoted me and finished me with a inner fire combo. WOW. JUST WOW. I HOPE YOU HAVE A VERY BAD DAY AND BREAKS BOTH OF YOUR ARMS SO YOU CANT PLAY HEARTHSTONE ANYMORE FAKKING IDIOT
1
Im not very convinced in cutting the bow. For me its one of the best cards in the deck. it helps to control the board or push dmg and gives good amount of value if you can get just 1-2 charges more on it.
0
I dont understand the problem. Druid is strong but not oppressive. Paladin is just the weakest class atm and its only viable deck (odd pala) gets also countered by druid. I play a lot of control warlock to counter all the otk and zoo decks.I think the meta is in a good place right now. I guess some people are just never satisfied. The only thing i would criticize is that the powerlevel of certain cards is too high and leads to totally one-sided games. See rogue quest, Hunter Dk , Baku etc.
1
I think you just play against bad players
8
is it really worth to play 2 heros?